A Nation’s Shame
Japanese-American Internment & Roosevelt’s Domestic ‘War on Terror’
A new book traces how America discarded civil
rights in the name of security during the forced internment of
Japanese-American citizens—and how the policy ruined families and
lives.
By Jake Whitney
August 31, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "Dailybeast"
- In early 1942, a World War I veteran
named Hideo Murata went to see his local sheriff. The two were old
friends, and Murata wanted to know if the stories he was hearing
were true, that every person of Japanese descent living on the West
Coast would be evacuated to an
internment camp. Murata came bearing an “Honorary Citizen”
certificate awarded for his Great War service. He showed it to his
friend. The sheriff told him that the order would apply to citizens
and non-citizens alike, and even war veterans. He would be evacuated
with the others.
Murata said goodbye to his friend, rented a hotel
room by the beach, and shot himself in the head. When his body was
found, Murata was still clutching the certificate. It read:
“Monterey County presents this testimonial of heartfelt gratitude,
of honor and respect for your loyal and splendid service to the
country in the Great War. Our flag was assaulted and you gallantly
took up its defense.”
The internment of Japanese Americans is one of the
most overlooked tragedies of the 20th century, and
Infamy by Richard Reeves picks up on the groundbreaking work
of others (the title is a nod to Michi Nishiura Weglyn’s 1976 book,
Years of Infamy, as well as to
FDR’s speech) to provide a more complete portrait of what the
internment process was like. Reeves tells the stories of those who
made the policy and those who fought against it but focuses on those
who lived it. He traces the lives of a dozen or so Japanese-American
families from the attack on Pearl Harbor to the post-war years.
While not all the stories are as tragic as Murata’s, they are all
heartbreaking in one way or another.
These were farmers and fisherman and shopkeepers
and students, and most of them lost everything—homes, businesses,
belongings, careers—once they were evacuated to one of 10 camps
situated in some of the most inhospitable land in the country.
Infamy succeeds as a document of this terrible ordeal. From a
narrative standpoint, however, each story is, unfortunately, very
similar to the last. But the book’s true significance comes from its
relevance to post 9/11 national security policy—particularly as a
jarring reminder of how easily Americans can be frightened into
swapping their ideals for security.
The role that the political and media classes
played in creating an atmosphere amenable to internment, for
example, is uncannily relevant to the way those classes purveyed
fear in the lead-up to and in the aftermath of the Iraq War. As
Reeves points out, the attack on Pearl Harbor was followed by a
brief but vociferous outpouring of support for Japanese Americans.
This is reminiscent of the fleeting unity Americans displayed after
9/11. Soon enough, however, West Coast politicians and media outlets
realized that stoking fears of “the Jap” could garner votes and
attract readers, and sentiment quickly changed. The actions of the
media were particularly galling.
Many of the first newspaper articles following
Pearl Harbor, in fact, warned against military overreaction and
illegal searches and seizures. But almost immediately political,
military, and agricultural interests (Japanese Americans owned a lot
of farmland that others wanted) weighed in, and before long West
Coast papers were “buying any story the military was selling.”
Internment was a matter of “military necessity,” the papers suddenly
clamored, and by early 1942 ludicrous articles about West Coast
invasions and racist diatribes about the devious “Japs” far
outnumbered articles warning of Constitutional violations.
Walter Lippmann is one of the book’s key villains.
Reeves paints Lippmann, a highly regarded columnist of the era, as a
Judith Miller-type figure. Miller, a Times reporter during
the Iraq War, was criticized as having been influenced by hawkish
politicians and military brass to terrify readers about WMD—helping
to “sell the war” to the American people. According to Reeves,
something similar happened with Lippmann. As the drums of Japano-phobia
beat louder in California, Lippmann met with California Attorney
General Earl Warren, who was advocating internment. According to
another dinner guest that night, Lippmann’s subsequent column
repeated “almost word for word” what Warren told him.
Reeves’s decision to focus on the column is a good
one, because its Orwellian language is staggering. Lippmann wrote
that the Pacific Coast was in “imminent danger” from “within and
without,” and—in the kind of backward logic that characterizes much
modern political speech—he asserted that proof existed that Japanese
Americans were plotting sabotage because there hadn’t been any
yet. By this logic, of course, you could indict anybody for
anything. Nevertheless, this “no evidence proves they’re plotting
something” mantra became a talking point among those pushing
internment. The column went far in selling the policy. On the day
after its publication, in fact, every Pacific Coast senator signed a
petition to President Roosevelt advocating internment.
By mid-1944, the War Department seemed to realize
the camps were not the best idea, and most Japanese Americans were
freed by December. Reeves attempts a hopeful ending by citing later
efforts at atonement. Presidents Truman and Ford would go on to
repudiate the camps, and a 1980 Congressional Report concluded that
the camps were not, after all, justified militarily. The report
stated that the policy was born out of “race prejudice, war
hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.” As heartening as
these events were, I wasn’t left feeling particularly hopeful. For
all Americans’ talk about remembering the past and not repeating
history, too much of Infamy feels contemporary.
In addition to the way, then as now, fear and
xenophobia are used to subvert civil rights in the U.S, modern
stereotypes of Latin Americans sound eerily like stereotypes of
Japanese a century ago. Moreover, internment policy was ostensibly
designed to protect America from traitors, but in fact the opposite
occurred: It turned scores of loyal citizens against America, much
like aspects of the War on Terror create more terrorists today.
Perhaps the most unnerving aspect of the policy, however, was that
the
camps were used as propaganda by the Axis powers, however
disingenuously, to argue that America, morally, was no better than
they were—much like our policies of torture, rendition, and drone
strikes are used to undermine moral arguments today.
At the end of Infamy, Reeves poses the
question, “Could
it happen again?” It’s hard to walk from the book without
feeling like it could.