Labour’s Corbyn:
British Establishment in Destroy Mode
By Finian Cunningham
August 20, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "SCF"
- Judging by the vitriol being heaped on
Labour leadership contender Jeremy Corbyn it is a sure sign that
Britain’s political establishment is deeply rattled by his runaway
popularity. The ruling elite are thus moving into «destroy mode».
The veteran Labour
Party MP threw his hat late into the ring to contest the leadership
race, but polls among rank and file Labour supporters have him as a
clear winner.
Ballots have gone out
to Labour members and the outcome of the party election will be
known in four weeks’ time. Already the British media campaign to
discredit Corbyn is well underway. The slander and vilification
being fired at the 66-year-old politician is going to get even more
vicious over the next month. And if he wins, as the polls suggest,
we can expect a full-on media war to destroy him over the next five
years towards Britain’s 2020 general election.
What this reveals,
starkly, is just how undemocratic Britain is. Any politician who
steps outside the establishment is liable for destruction by the
ruling forces.
The thing is that the
more the British media attempt to besmirch Corbyn, the more his
popularity grows, especially among younger voters, who have lately
signed up in droves to join the Labour Party in order to vote for
him.
Across Britain,
including Scotland, Corbyn is packing town hall meetings with his
straight-talking and openly socialist policies. The electrifying
public mood engendered by Corbyn supporters has even coined a new
phrase – «Corbyn-mania».
The North London MP,
who has held his parliamentary seat since 1983, has a proven record
of opposing neoliberal capitalist economics, public austerity and
the warmongering foreign policies of both the Conservative Party and
the Labour Party leadership under the sway of Blairism.
Corbyn is campaigning
on ending austerity with massive public investment in healthcare and
education, taking major industries into public ownership, and
disarming Britain’s Trident nuclear weapon program. On foreign
policy, he is against NATO membership and Britain’s involvement in
overseas wars under US tutelage. Corbyn is pro-Palestinian and wants
friendly relations with Russia.
All in all, Corbyn is
articulating policies that are tantamount to signing his own
political death warrant, as far as the British establishment is
concerned. But as far as ordinary Britons go, Corbyn is being seen
as a politician who at last reflects their own views of social
justice, democratic governance and anti-war policies.
Craig Murray, former
British ambassador to Uzbekistan,
reckons that Britain’s state security apparatus will «target»
Corbyn to derail his leadership bid. Murray says that the media
campaign being mounted against Corbyn is a replay of the frenzy that
the British establishment unleashed against the Scottish
pro-independence vote in last year’s referendum. Another example of
Britain’s undemocratic condition.
«Democracy in the
United Kingdom is dysfunctional because an entrenched party system
offers no choice», says the former ambassador.
Corbyn is now offering
a real choice to people. And the British establishment is
apoplectic. «The sheer panic gripping the London elite now is
hilarious to behold», says Murray, who has given his backing to the
Labour backbencher.
Michael Meacher, a
former Labour minister, has also weighed in to support Corbyn’s
leadership race. «It is the biggest non-revolutionary upturning of
the social order in modern British politics,» he said.
«The Blairite coup of
the mid-1990s hijacked the party to the Tory ideology of leave it
all to the markets and let the state get out of the way,» added
Meacher. «After 20 years of swashbuckling capitalism, the people of
Britain have said enough, and Labour is finally regaining its real
principles and values».
Other party figures
lending their support include Ken Livingstone, the former mayor of
London, who was himself denigrated in the past by the British media
as «Red Ken» owing to his socialist policies.
Corbyn’s politics hark
back to «Old Labour» under the guidance of the late Michael Foot and
Tony Benn. That was before the party came under the sway of
«reformist» Tony Blair and his successors who have dominated Labour
ever since. The other current leadership contenders, Andy Burnham,
Yvette Cooper and Liz Kendall, are all from the «Blairite» school of
politics that bows to the capitalist market and US-led military
atlanticism.
It is a measure of how
much the Blairite New Labour Party is held in contempt by voters
that Corbyn’s rivals are lagging in the polls. Traditional Labour
supporters contend that the pale imitation of Tory policies under
New Labour was a factor in why the party lost the recent British
general election in May. They also claim that this was a factor in
why Scottish voters rejected Labour in favour of the anti-austerity
Scottish National Party.
The Labour Party
establishment is seen as part of the Westminster ruling clique,
comprised of the rightwing Tory Party of David Cameron and the
mainstream news media.
The avowedly
pro-Labour newspapers, The Guardian and The Mirror, have joined the
fray of bashing Corbyn. Of the two news outlets, the supposedly
erudite Guardian has shown the lowest tactics of ad hominem attacks.
It has run an endless
stream of articles and opinion pieces by Blairite politicians aimed
at character assassination of Corbyn. Former Prime Ministers Tony
Blair and Gordon Brown have appealed to party members to reject him.
In a near-hysterical article, Blair
said that Corbyn would lead to the «annihilation»of the party,
while Brown was
quoted making the base and outlandish argument:
«And I have to say, if
our global alliances are going to be alliances with Hezbollah and
Hamas and Hugo Chavez's Venezuela and Vladimir Putin's Russia, there
is no chance of building a worldwide alliance that could deal with
poverty and inequality and climate change and financial
instability».
In their attacks on
Corbyn, the two nominally leftwing newspapers have circled the
wagons with the preponderantly rightwing British press.
The Daily Mail
tells its readers that Corbyn «has been linked to conspiracy
theorists and Holocaust deniers» and maintains connections with
«extremists» like Hamas, the Irish Republican Army and Russian
leader Vladimir Putin.
Rupert Murdoch’s
tabloid, The Sun, has labelled him a «firebrand pensioner», a
«Marxist throwback» and a «refugee from a 1970s industrial strike
picket line».
But despite all the
opprobrium and slur, Jeremy Corbyn has retained a steady, unfazed
dignity.
He says: «We’re the
one putting forward ideas, so I don’t do personal, I don’t do
reaction, I don’t do abuse… I think we should try and enhance the
democratic life of this country, not reduce it to that level».
Corbyn has the moral
high ground and no amount of smearing has yet dissuaded voters from
supporting him. Quite the opposite in fact. He says: «Can we please
– and I say this to everyone – just talk about the issues that
people are facing: the poverty levels, the inequality levels, the
health problems, the way in which austerity is impacting on the
lives of the most vulnerable in society? That is what’s most
important».
On the orthodoxy of
neoliberal austerity supported by both the Conservative Party and
the Blairite Labour establishment, Corbyn says: «Austerity is used
as a cover to reconfigure society and increase inequality and
injustice. Labour needs to offer a coherent economic alternative».
Far from being
rejected as a reckless «leftie», Corbyn is galvanising public
support because his views are seen as eminently reasonable and
democratic by an increasing number of ordinary citizens.
The flurry of
invective that he is being pilloried with is a revealing display of
how autocratic and undemocratic Britain truly is.
Corbyn is winning over
the people with «old» policies that never really went out of
fashion, but which were for decades smothered by Britain’s
establishment. In today’s world of capitalist bankruptcy, Corbyn’s
advocacy of democratic socialism is rekindling fervent public
support and lighting a fire under Britain’s ruling class. It is not
Corbyn who is discredited. It is the ruling orthodoxy, and that is
why they have a morbid fear of the democratic forces he is fanning.
But in the next four
weeks we will see the depths of reaction and dirt that the British
establishment will steep to in order to make sure that the people
are prevented from exercising a real democratic choice. The people
may yet win. However, a momentous battle is shaping up.
© Strategic Culture Foundation