“Lone Wolf” Terror and the PsyWar on American
Public Opinion
By James Tracy
August 12, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "Memoryhole"
- “The conscious and intelligent manipulation
of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important
element in democratic society,” Edward Bernays
observed almost a century ago. “Those who manipulate this unseen
mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the
true ruling power of our country.” Bernays’ insight reflects the
view of corporate statists he regularly commissioned with.
Intertwined with complex public relations
exercises, corporate news media’s role today has far less to do with
informing the public than it does with maintaining a perpetual
tension and anxiety throughout the body politic. Through such
tension the citizenry will further gravitate toward or even
consciously advocate for heightened police state measures now
peddled a prerequisite for public safety.
Recent quantitative and historically-oriented
studies by
USA Today and the
Congressional
Research Service (CRS) on mass murder in the United States
provide much food for thought especially since they suggest vast
public misperceptions concerning massacre events that call out for
further inquiry. More than ever, public opinion has been fueled by a
corporate news media disproportionately sensationalizing certain
mass murders while overlooking others that are at least as serious.
The CRS looked at an array of academic studies and
FBI data to find an annual average of 31 mass murders (defined as
four or more victims excluding the perpetrator). Importantly, mass
shootings have increased only slightly between 2009 and 2013 versus
preceding five year periods dating to 1999. Of these, about two
thirds involve firearms. If the year 2012 was excluded from the
latest 2009-13timespan that period’s average number of incidents
(22.4) and fatalities (116) would have shown a significant decrease
versus the previous two five year averages.
Prominent gun rights opponents such as President
Obama and Michael Bloomberg have advocated for gun control measures.
Their activism has been most vigorous following the 2012 events, in
particular the mass shootings at Aurora Colorado and Newtown
Connecticut, each of which now appear to have been “false flags”
intended to bolster the case for scaling back the Second Amendment
(e.g.
here,
here,
here and
here).
Despite these poorly understood and vastly
propagandized events Aurora and Sandy Hook have been imbued in the
pubic mind on a scale comparable to the September 11, 2001 “terror
attacks.” This is the case even though there are now far more
contradictions and unanswered questions concerning both events than
when they initially transpired.
In the case of Newtown local and state authorities
have had difficulty responding to numerous public records requests
simply querying on the most fundamental documents to confirm whether
the event ever took place as reported by major news media. The very
news outlets sensationalizing the massacre have long since moved on
to solicit the most recent bloodlettings in Charleston, Chattanooga,
and Lafayette.
Corporate news outlets indeed know how the public
fears being involved in such an event. According to one nationwide
survey of adults highlighted in the CRS study,
Americans’ top fears include 1) walking alone
at night, 2) becoming the victim of identity theft, 3) various
risks of using the Internet, 4) being the victim of a mass
shooting, and 5) public speaking.
Most Americans learn of catastrophic events from
television news, and overwhelmingly rely on the video display of
news to make sense of their world. The corporate media chieftains
and their subordinate producers and editors overseeing the modern
consciousness industry thus have free reign to manipulate the
thoughts, fears, even the dreams of the populace, thereby shaping
the psychic basis for what is deemed desirable public policy. They
choose specific stories and gauge the extent of their exposure to
craft national public opinion and dismiss others not upholding
certain agendas, such as race-based social tension and gun control.
As the observations below suggest, Time Warner’s CNN is a central
agent in bolstering such perspectives.
A cursory examination of recent broadcast news may
prove helpful in demonstrating today’s psywar on the American
people. Coverage of the July 18, 2015 shooting at a military
recruiting station and base in Chattanooga Tennessee, and the July
23, 2015 massacre in a Lafayette Louisiana movie theater are
illustrative. Each incident resulted in profuse media attention,
making the events impossible to overlook.
Yet equally tragic and alarming mass murders
transpired on these exact dates with comparatively little reportage
or commentary from corporate media. For example, on July 18 in
Northern California one Martin Martinez was charged with the murders
of three young children and two women, one of whom was a practicing
physician.
On July 23 two teenage boys were taken into
custody in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma as suspects in the brutal stabbing
deaths of five family members. The scene was so disturbing that even
responding police officers were visibly shaken, a rare story by
NBC News noted. “The crime scene has taken a pretty heavy toll
on officers who have come out here,” a Broken Arrow policeman
remarked. “It hits close to home, especially when the victims are
adults and juveniles. Our officers have a lot to take in.”
Comparing the coverage of these four comparable
events that transpired on or around the same dates indexed by the
LexisNexis database, one finds the privileged stories chose to
impress upon the public mind the alleged problem of “love wolves,”
their purported ideological predispositions—in these instances
Muslim and Nazi-racist fanaticism—and the apparent ease with which
they have obtained firearms.
Chattanooga Marine Base Shooting Coverage
in Broadcast News, July 16-23, 2015 via LexisNexis
Total Story Transcript
Yield: 389
Various Independent and
Network Affiliate Broadcasts — 120
CNN — 119
Fox News — 36
CBS News — 21
ABC News — 19
NBC News — 14
MSNBC — 12
Federal News Service — 10
National Public Radio — 8
Channel News Asia — 6
CNN International — 6
Canadian Television Network — 4
Lou Dobbs Tonight — 4
Congressional Quarterly Transcriptions — 3
Euronews English — 3
PBS NewsHour — 3
ABC Australia — 1
Modesto California Mass Murder Broadcast
News Coverage, July 18-25, 2015 via LexisNexis
Total Story Transcript Yield: 22
Various Independent and
Network Affiliate Broadcasts — 17
CNN — 1
ABC News — 1
CBS News — 1
NBC News — 1
Canadian Television Network — 1
Lafayette Theater Shooting Broadcast News
Coverage, July 23-30, 2015 via LexisNexis
Total Story Transcript
Yield: 343
Various Independent and
Network Affiliate Broadcasts — 161
CNN — 78
Fox News — 9
CBS News — 22
ABC News — 21
NBC News — 13
MSNBC — 12
Federal News Service — 9
Canadian Television Network — 3
National Public Radio — 2
Congressional Quarterly Transcriptions — 3
Channel News Asia — 2
CNN International — 2
Euronews English — 2
PBS NewsHour — 1
Financial Market Regulatory Wire — 1
Lou Dobbs Tonight — 1
On
the same day of the Louisiana movie theater shooting, two
teenagers were charged in Oklahoma with the stabbing deaths of
five family members. The latter story was largely overlooked by
major news media.
Broken Arrow Oklahoma Mass Stabbing
Broadcast News Coverage, July 23-30, 2015
Total Story Transcript
Yield: 7
Various Independent and
Network Affiliate Broadcasts — 4
CNN — 1
ABC — 1
NBC — 1
How can one explain such disparate coverage? It
may be attributable to the random nature of editorial
decision-making at major news outlets. A more critical analysis,
however, suggests a coordinated effort to maneuver public opinion
behind the “war on terror” and continued public acceptance of
America’s police state.
Can this merely be dismissed as “conspiracy
theory”? It is well established that CNN and NPR have collaborated
with US military psychological warfare experts in recent years. “CNN
had hosted a total of five interns from U.S. Army Psyops, two in
television, two in radio, and one in satellite operations,”
Project Censored noted in the early 2000s, citing coverage of
the phenomenon in both alternative and mainstream outlets.
The military/CNN personnel belonged to the
airmobile Fourth Psychological Operations Group stationed at
Fort Bragg, North Carolina. One of the main tasks of this group
of almost 1,200 soldiers and officers is to spread “selected
information.” The propaganda group was involved in the Gulf War,
the war in Bosnia, and the crisis in Kosovo.
The military personnel stayed with CNN for at
least two weeks “to get to know the company and to broaden their
horizons.” Collins maintains that “they didn’t work under the
control of the army.” The temporary outplacement of U.S. Army
Psyops personnel in various sectors of society began a couple of
years ago. Contract periods vary from weeks to one year.
In light of the Sandy Hook and Aurora events, in
addition to other sensationalized mass shootings like those
referenced above, it is not unreasonable to question whether CNN and
other major news outlets are again carrying out such exercises.
Given the corporate news media and federal government’s accelerating
arrogance and lack of accountability, would the public ever be privy
to such a scheme?
With the above comparisons in mind one needs to
seriously consider the extent to which CNN and other news outlets
are again working with intelligence and/or military psywar personnel
to essentially “brainwash the American public” on crucial issues
such as gun control, as former Attorney General Eric Holder
recommended in 1995.
There is an all too apparent intent behind today’s
terrorist and mass shooting events—an insidious and fraudulent
effort to rob people of not only their constitutional freedoms but
also their peace of mind and ability to exercise basic free
association in their communities. This brings a whole new meaning to
the term “terrorism,” as well as the real parties actually
implicated in the psychic torment of a once free nation.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)