How the Iran Deal 'Snap Back' Could be Manipulated
By Francis Boyle
July 21, 2015 "Information
Clearing House"
- “President Obama and others have
stated that if Iran violates the agreement, the sanctions on Iran
will ‘snap back’ into place. That’s true, but what’s menacing about
this is what they don’t highlight: the sanctions could quite
conceivably ‘snap back’ based on some bogus pretext after Iran has
dismantled the guts of its nuclear industry that is lawful under the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Everyone knows that Iran does not
have nuclear weapons to begin with.
“Under the agreement, this current or some future
U.S. administration would only need the votes of the European powers
to enact such a scenario since decisions will be made by the
majority of a group that includes not only Iran, China, Russia,
France and the UK, but also Germany and the EU. They have in effect
set up a mechanism that gets around the possibility of a Russian
and/or Chinese veto.
“The UN Security Council resolution passed today
states that disputes arising from the agreement will be dealt with
by this panel and that ‘If the Security Council does not adopt a
resolution’ then the sanctions Iran has been under ‘shall apply in
the same manner as they applied before the adoption of this
resolution.’ So if the U.S. vetoes action by the Security Council,
the sanctions come back.
“There has been misreporting on this issue, for
example rightwing outlets like CNS falsely claiming: ‘Iran
Deal Includes Loophole in Sanctions “Snapback’ Mechanism.’
Meanwhile, most mainstream or liberal reporting or commentary about
this has been laudatory about the way the ‘snap back’ mechanism
works: ‘How
the Iran Deal’s ‘Snap Back’ Mechanism Will Keep Tehran Compliant.’
“This ignores the record of the U.S. government on
these issues. In the recent case of Libya, Muammar Gaddafi
eliminated his nuclear equipment and then was literally stabbed in
the back — NATO bombed the country, he was murdered, and there’s a
failed state there now, leading to untold human suffering. At a
minimum, the United States government will use the ‘snap-back’
mechanism as a cudgel to beat the Islamic Republic of Iran into
‘regime change,’ which has been its objective all along.”
Boyle is a professor at the University of
Illinois College of Law. His books on international law include
Destroying Libya and World Order.
Via - the
Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA)