Warning: Nuclear Deal With Iran Prelude to War,
Not "Breakthrough"
By Tony Cartalucci
July 14, 2015 "Information
Clearing House"
- Originally posted in November of 2013, the
article, "Nuclear
Deal With Iran Prelude to War, Not "Breakthrough,"
warned of a premeditated, documented conspiracy to use a monumental
"deal" with Iran as a pretext not for peace, but in fact, for war
and regime change.
Hysteria now sweeps the headlines across the Western media regarding
a "historical nuclear deal" that "Obama made" that vindicates the
Nobel Peace Prize he was "prematurely awarded" so many years ago.
For those aware of the ruse at play, such sentiments are to be
inevitably and completely betrayed by what is sure to follow.
The global public must remember there is
currently a war raging in Syria on Iran's doorstep. The sole
purpose of this war, organized and directed by the West, fueled
by billions in cash, weapons, and flooded with fighters
organized and trafficked from across the globe by NATO and its
allies, is to destroy Iran's chief regional ally before
inevitably destroying Iran itself. If the war in Syria is still
raging, then one can be assured that the proxy war in turn being
waged against Iran is still raging.
The "nuclear deal," as it was planned to be all along, is a
ruse. The 2013 article, "Nuclear
Deal With Iran Prelude to War, Not "Breakthrough,"" in its
entirety, explains:
"...any military operation against Iran will
likely be very unpopular around the world and require the
proper international context—both to ensure the logistical
support the operation would require and to minimize the
blowback from it. The best way to minimize international
opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or
covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread
conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a
superb offer—one so good that only a regime determined to
acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong
reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the
United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as
taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the
international community would conclude that the Iranians
“brought it on themselves” by refusing a very good deal."
-Brookings Institution's 2009 "Which
Path to Persia?" report, page 52.
Written years ago,
as the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel were already
plotting to overrun Iran's neighbor and ally Syria with Al
Qaeda to weaken the Islamic Republic before inevitable war,
this quote exposes fully the current charade that is the
"Iran nuclear deal."
The West has no intention of striking any lasting deal with
Iran, as nuclear capabilities, even the acquirement of
nuclear weapons by Iran
was never truly an existential threat to Western nations or
their regional partners. The West's issue with Iran is
its sovereignty and its ability to project its interests
into spheres traditionally monopolized by the US and UK
across the Middle East. Unless Iran plans on turning over
its sovereignty and regional influence along with its right
to develop and use nuclear technology, betrayal of any
"nuclear deal" is all but inevitable, as is the war that is
to shortly follow.
Exposing the duplicity that accompanies Western "efforts" to
strike a deal will severely undermine their attempt to then
use the deal as leverage to justify military operations
against Iran. For Iran and its allies, they must be prepared
for war, more so when the West feigns interest in peace.
Libya serves as a perfect example of the fate that awaits
nations reproached by the West who let down their guard - it
literally is a matter of life and death both for leaders,
and for nations as a whole.
This article was originally published at
Land Destroyer
|
