Full text of Obama on Iran deal: ‘Every pathway to a
nuclear weapon is cut off’
President tells Tehran:
‘A foreign policy based on threats to attack your neighbors or
eradicate Israel, that’s a dead end’
By ICH
July
14, 2015 "Information
Clearing House"
-
After two years of negotiations, the
United States, together with our international partners, has
achieved something that decades of animosity has not: a
comprehensive long-term deal with Iran that will prevent it from
obtaining a nuclear weapon.
This deal demonstrates that
American diplomacy can bring about real and meaningful change,
change that makes our country and the world safer and more secure.
This deal is also in line
with a tradition of American leadership. It’s now more than 50 years
since President Kennedy stood before the American people and said,
“Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to
negotiate.” He was speaking then about the need for discussions
between the United States and the Soviet Union, which led to efforts
to restrict the spread of nuclear weapons.
In those days, the risk was
a catastrophic nuclear war between two superpowers. In our time, the
risk is that nuclear weapons will spread to more and more countries,
particularly in the Middle East, the most volatile region in our
world.
Today, because America
negotiated from a position of strength and principle, we have
stopped the spread of nuclear weapons in this region. Because of
this deal, the international community will be able to verify that
the Islamic Republic of Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon.
This deal meets every
single one of the bottom lines that we established when we achieved
a framework this spring. Every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut
off, and the inspection and transparency regime necessary to verify
that objective will be put in place. Because of this deal, Iran will
not produce the highly enriched uranium and weapons-grade plutonium
that form the raw materials necessary for a nuclear bomb.
Because of this deal, Iran
will remove two thirds of its installed centrifuges, the machines
necessary to produce highly enriched uranium for a bomb and store
them under constant international supervision. Iran will not use its
advanced centrifuges to produce enriched uranium for the next
decade. Iran will also get rid of 98 percent of its stockpile of
enriched uranium.
To put that in perspective,
Iran currently has a stockpile that could produce up to 10 nuclear
weapons. Because of this deal that stockpile will be reduced to a
fraction of what would be required for a single weapon. This
stockpile limitation will last for 15 years.
Because of this deal, Iran
will modify the core of its reactor in Arak so that it will not
produce weapons grade plutonium and it has agreed to ship the spent
fuel from the reactor out of the country for the lifetime of the
reactor. For at least the next 15 years Iran will not build any new
heavy water reactors.
Because of this deal we
will for the first time be in a position to verify all of these
commitments. That means this deal is not built on trust. It is built
on verification. Inspectors will have 24/7 access to Iran’s nuclear
facilities. Iran will have access to Iran’s entire nuclear supply
chain, its uranium mines and mills, its conversion facility and its
centrifuge manufacturing and storage facilities.
This ensures that Iran will
not be able to divert materials from known facilities to covert
ones. Some of these transparency measures will be in place for 25
years.
Because of this deal,
inspectors will also be able to access any suspicious location — put
simply, the organization responsible for the inspections, the IAEA,
will have access where necessary, when necessary. That arrangement
is permanent. And the IAEA has also reached an agreement with Iran
to get access that it needs to complete its investigation into the
possible military dimensions of Iran’s past nuclear research.
Finally Iran is permanently
prohibited from pursuing a nuclear weapon under the Nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty, which provided the basis for the
international community’s efforts to apply pressure on Iran.
As Iran takes steps to
implement this deal, it will receive relief from the sanctions that
we put in place because of Iran’s nuclear program, both America’s
own sanctions and sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security
Council.
This relief will be phased
in. Iran must complete key nuclear steps before it begins to receive
sanctions relief.
And over the course of the
next decade, Iran must abide by the deal before additional sanctions
are lifted, including five years for restrictions related to arms
and eight years for restrictions related to ballistic missiles.
All of this will be
memorialized and endorsed in a new United Nations Security Council
resolution. And if Iran violates the deal, all of these sanctions
will snap back into place. So there is a very clear incentive for
Iran to follow through and there are very real consequences for a
violation.
That’s the deal. It has the
full backing of the international community. Congress will now have
an opportunity to review the details and my administration stands
ready to provide extensive briefings on how this will move forward.
As the American people and
Congress review the deal it will be important to consider the
alternative. Consider what happens in a world without this deal.
Without this deal, there is no scenario where the world joins us in
sanctioning Iran until it completely dismantles its nuclear program.
Nothing we know about the Iranian government suggests that it would
simply capitulate under that kind of pressure and the world would
not support an effort to permanently sanction Iran into submission.
We put sanctions in place
to get a diplomatic resolution and that is what we have done.
Without this deal there would be no agreed-upon limitations for the
Iranian nuclear program. Iran could produce, operate and test more
and more centrifuges. Iran could fuel a reactor capable of producing
plutonium for a bomb and we would not have any of the inspections
that would allow us to detect a covert nuclear weapons program.
In other words, no deal
means no lasting constraints on Iran’s nuclear program. Such a
scenario would make it more likely that other countries in the
region would feel compelled to pursue their own nuclear programs,
threatening a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region of the
world.
It would also present the
United States with fewer and less effective options to prevent Iran
from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
I have been president and
commander in chief for over six years now. Time and again I have
faced decisions about whether or not to use military force. It’s the
greatest decision that any president has to make.
Many times, in multiple
countries, I have decided to use force. And I will never hesitate to
do so when it is in our national security interest. I strongly
believe that our national security interest now depends upon
preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, which means that,
without a diplomatic resolution, neither I nor a future U.S.
president would face a decision about whether or not to allow Iran
to obtain a nuclear weapon or whether to use our military to stop
it.
Put simply, no deal means a
greater chance of more war in the Middle East. Moreover, we give
nothing up by testing whether or not this problem can be solved
peacefully. If, in a worst-case scenario, Iran violates the deal,
the same options that are available to me today will be available to
any U.S. president in the future.
And I have no doubt that 10
or 15 years from now, the person who holds this office will be in a
far stronger position with Iran further away from a weapon and with
the inspections and transparency that allow us to monitor the
Iranian program.
For this reason, I believe
it would be irresponsible to walk away from this deal. But on such a
tough issue, it is important that the American people and the
representatives in Congress get a full opportunity to review the
deal.
After all, the details
matter. And we’ve had some of the finest nuclear scientists in the
world working through those details. And we’re dealing with a
country — Iran — that has been a sworn adversary of the United
States for over 35 years.
So I welcome a robust
debate in Congress on this issue and I welcome scrutiny of the
details of this agreement. But I will remind Congress that you don’t
make deals like this with your friends. We negotiated arms control
agreements with the Soviet Union when that nation was committed to
our destruction and those agreements ultimately made us safer.
I am confident that this
deal will meet the national security interests of the United States
and our allies. So I will veto any legislation that prevents the
successful implementation of this deal. We do not have to accept an
inevitable spiral into conflict. And we certainly shouldn’t seek it.
And precisely because the stakes are so high this is not the time
for politics or posturing. Tough talk from Washington does not solve
problems. Hard-nosed diplomacy, leadership that has united the
world’s major powers offers a more effective way to verify that Iran
is not pursuing a nuclear weapon.
Now that doesn’t mean that
this deal will resolve all of our differences with Iran. We share
the concerns expressed by many of our friends in the Middle East,
including Israel and the Gulf states, about Iran’s support for
terrorism and its use of proxies to destabilize the region.
But that is precisely why
we are taking this step, because an Iran armed with a nuclear weapon
would be far more destabilizing and far more dangerous to our
friends and to the world.
Meanwhile we will maintain
our own sanctions related to Iran’s support for terrorism, its
ballistic missile program and its human rights violations. We will
continue our unprecedented efforts to strengthen Israel’s security,
efforts that go beyond what any American administration has done
before.
And we will continue the
work we began at Camp David, to elevate our partnership with the
Gulf States to strengthen their capabilities to counter threats from
Iran or terrorist groups like ISIL.
However, I believe that we
must continue to test whether or not this region, which has known so
much suffering, so much bloodshed, can move in a different
direction.
Time and again I have made
clear to the Iranian people that we will always be open to
engagement on the basis of mutual interests and mutual respect. Our
differences are real and the difficult history between our nations
cannot be ignored. But it is possible to change.
The path of violence and
rigid ideology, a foreign policy based on threats to attack your
neighbors or eradicate Israel, that’s a dead end. A different path,
one of tolerance and peaceful resolution of conflict, leads to more
integration into the global economy, more engagement with the
international community and the ability of the Iranian people to
prosper and thrive. This deal offers an opportunity to move in a new
direction. We should seize it.
We have come a long way to
reach this point: decades of an Iranian nuclear program, many years
of sanctions, and many months of intense negotiation.
Today, I want to thank the
members of Congress, from both parties, who helped us put in place
the sanctions that have proven so effective as well as the other
countries who joined us in that effort. I want to thank our
negotiating partners — the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia,
China, as well as the European Union — for our unity in this effort,
which showed that the world can do remarkable things when we share a
vision of peacefully addressing conflict. We showed what we can do
when we do not split apart.
And finally, I want to
thank the American negotiating team. We had a team of experts
working for several weeks straight on this, including our secretary
of energy, Ernie Moniz. And I want to particularly thank John Kerry,
our secretary of state, who began his service to this country more
than four decades ago when he put on our uniform and went off to
war. He is now making this country safer through his commitment to
strong, principled American diplomacy.
History shows that America
must lead, not just with our might, but with our principles. It
shows we are stronger, not when we are alone, but when we bring the
world together. Today’s announcement marks one more chapter in this
pursuit of a safer and more helpful, more hopeful world.
Thank you. God bless you
and God bless the United States of America.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)