Throughout History, Debt and War Have Been Constant Partners
As Greece’s spending on weapons shows, it’s not pensions or benefits that
cripple economies, it’s the military-industrial complex
By Giles Fraser
Greek frigates and torpedo
boats during a military exercise in 2005. 'In the years following
their EU entry, the Greeks were the world’s fourth-highest spenders
on conventional weaponry.' Photograph: Petros Giannakouris/AP |
July 08, 2015 "Information
Clearing House"
- "The
Guardian" -
Somewhere in a Greek jail, the former
defence minister, Akis Tsochatzopoulos, watches the financial crisis unfold. I
wonder how partly responsible he feels? In 2013, Akis (as he is popularly known)
went down for 20 years, finally succumbing to the waves of financial scandal
to which his name had long been associated. For alongside the lavish spending,
the houses and the dodgy tax returns, there was bribery, and it was the €8m
appreciation
he received from the German arms dealer, Ferrostaal, for the Greek
government’s purchase of
Type 214 submarines, that sent him to prison.
There is this idea that the Greeks got themselves into this
current mess because they paid themselves too much for doing too little. Well,
maybe. But it’s not the complete picture. For the Greeks also got themselves
into debt for the oldest reason in the book – one might even argue, for the very
reason that public debt itself was first invented – to raise and support an
army. The state’s need for quick money to raise an army is how industrial-scale
money lending comes into business (in the face of the church’s historic
opposition to usury). Indeed, in the west, one might even stretch to say that
large-scale public debt began as a way to finance military intervention in the
Middle East – ie the crusades. And just as rescuing Jerusalem from the Turks was
the justification for massive military spending in the middle ages, so the fear
of Turkey has been the reason given for recent Greek spending. Along with German
subs, the Greeks have bought French frigates, US F16s and German Leopard 2
tanks. In the 1980s, for example, the Greeks spent an average of 6.2% of their
GDP on defence compared with a European average of 2.9%. In the years following
their EU entry, the Greeks were the world’s fourth-highest spenders on
conventional weaponry.
So, to recap: corrupt German companies bribed corrupt Greek
politicians to buy German weapons. And then a German chancellor presses for
austerity on the Greek people to pay back the loans they took out (with Germans
banks) at massive interest, for the weapons they bought off them in the first
place. Is this an unfair characterisation? A bit. It wasn’t just Germany. And
there were many other factors at play in the escalation of Greek debt. But the
postwar difference between the Germans and the Greeks is not the tired
stereotype that the former are hardworking and the latter are lazy, but rather
that, among other things, the Germans have, for obvious reasons, been restricted
in their military spending. And they have benefited massively from that.
Debt and war are constant partners. “The global financial crisis
was due, at least in part, to the war,” wrote Nobel prize-winning economist
Joseph Stiglitz, calculating the cost of the US intervention in Afghanistan and
Iraq, pre-financial crash, to have been $3tn. Indeed, it was only this year,
back in March, that the UK taxpayer finally paid off the money we borrowed to
fight the first world war. “This is a moment for Britain to be proud of,” said
George Osborne, as he paid the final instalment of £1.9bn. Really?
The phrase “military-industrial complex” is one of those
cliches of 70s leftwing radicalism, but it was Dwight D Eisenhower, a five-star
general no less, who warned against its creeping power in his final speech as
president. “This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large
arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic,
political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every state house, every
office of the federal government … we must not fail to comprehend its grave
implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the
very structure of our society.” Ike was right.
This week, Church House, C of E HQ,
hosted a conference sponsored by the arms dealers Lockheed Martin and MBDA
Missile Systems. We preach about turning swords into ploughs yet help
normalise an industry that turns them back again. The
archbishop of Canterbury has been pretty solid on Wonga and trying to put
legal loan sharks out of business. Now the church needs to take this up a level.
For the debts that cripple entire countries come mostly from spending on war,
not on pensions. And we don’t say this nearly enough.
@giles_fraser
© 2015 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated
companies. All rights reserved.See also -
Britain slashes spending in new austerity drive:
"We found savings of £12 billion from welfare and £5 billion from tackling tax
evasion, avoidance, planning and imbalances in the tax system. "The other half
will largely come from government departments through savings and cuts."
Britain commits to NATO 2 percent defense spending target
for next 5 years: "Committing today to meet
the NATO pledge to spend 2 percent of our national income on defense. Not just
this year, but every year of this decade." Shares in BAE Systems, Britain's
biggest defense contractor, traded up 2.9 percent after the news, making the
company one of the top risers on Britain's bluechip index.