The Partition of 'Syraq'
By Pepe Escobar
June 19, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "RT"
- With less than two weeks before a possible
nuclear deal being struck between Iran and the P5+1, the
brinkmanship across the “wilderness of mirrors” of Middle Eastern
intel is reaching fever pitch. Spin reigns supreme. And nothing is
what it seems.
Of course
a lot riding on the Iran nuclear deal has to do with Pipelineistan.
Iran, assuming sanctions quickly collapse, will finally be able to
sell natural gas to the EU – theoretically in competition with
Gazprom; but that will take a long time, until Iranian (decaying)
infrastructure is upgraded.
Then there’s the future of the key, $10 billion,
proposed Iran-Iraq-Syria gas pipeline – rival to a Qatari project.
It’s easy to identify those who do not want a stable Iraq able to
lay gas pipes along its territory. Qatar brags it has more
(deliverable) gas – and better infrastructure – than Iran. Pipeline
feasibility from Qatar via Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Lebanon has
already been stud ied. If Tehran wants quick results, it would be a
much better deal to export to the EU directly via Turkey than
through Iraq and Syria.
As for the hegemon, things were so much easier
after Shock and Awe in 2003. Then, Washington owned the world; it
could just march in and take (and destroy) what it wanted. That’s
what Full Spectrum Dominance was all about. For a split (historical)
second.
Now the self-described “Don’t Do Stupid Stuff”
Obama administration barely qualifies as a broken mirror in a
wilderness of mirrors.
So let’s plow the wilderness across “Syraq.”
NATO officials in Brussels seem to believe that
the Pentagon trained hardcore Sunnis in Anbar province in the use of
heavy weapons to knock out the former government of Prime Minister
al-Maliki in Baghdad – which was causing problems to Washington. But
the fact is the training facilitated the ulterior “merger”
of these Sunnis with ISIS/ISIL/Daesh.
The Pentagon – or NATO for that matter – could
easily smash the fake Caliphate. But they don't want to; it’s much
better to let chaos fester, the perfect Divide and Rule tactic that
suit the usual suspects. Syria is in ruins. Iraq is in ruins.
ISIS/ISIL/Daesh supply convoys are coming out of NATO’s Turkey-Syria
border, protected by Turkish air power; thus NATO – and the CIA –
are de facto “supporting” the fake Caliphate. Egypt is
bankrupt. Iran is almost broke. The usual suspects never had it so
good.
Now let’s go to a top Saudi intel source to add to
the imbroglio. According to the source, Palmyra was “given”
to ISIS/ISIL/Daesh in Syria just like key cities in Anbar province
in Iraq; “Daesh is not a secret anymore and the US has as much
interest in it as in the [former] axis of evil.”
The fact that ISIS/ISIL/Daesh, after each victory
on the ground, quickly integrates into their forces lots of very
advanced American weaponry that takes months to master may certainly
indicate that the Caliph’s goons had serious training from Western
intel assets.
At the same time, the Saudi intel source
entertains the fantasy of a two-headed Caliphate; the one in Syria
directly linked to Assad’s government in Damascus – which is
preposterous, while the Caliphate in Iraq fights Iran.
US
President Barack Obama, meanwhile, procrastinates; he said ISIS/ISIL/Daesh
may be defeated, but over three years. Once again, why not let chaos
fester?
Another Saudi intel source is positively
downhearted; “The United States will not allow regime change”
in Syria. This intel operative sees the GCC role as trying to
“save Syria”, and he blames the CIA for “interfering with
their transfer of weapons to the Free Syrian Army (FSA)”. In
the end, the GCC petro-monarchies “rerouted their weapons
deliveries to circumvent the CIA obstructions.” So now all the
hardcore Islamists of the Jabhat al-Nusra kind are duly weaponized.
The House of Saud continues to be obsessed with
the fall of Assad (and “his relegation to an enclave under a
partition”). That would be a killer blow to Hezbollah, coupled
to the partition of Iraq “decimating the Tehran dream to
reestablish the Farsi empire Obama is so obsessed in aiding.”
The Saudis also seem to believe the fancy notion
that Sunnis in Anbar province realized that ISIS/ISIL/Daesh is a
proxy – fed simultaneously by the West and Iran – to “expedite
sectarian feuds and accelerate the call for partition.” In
fact, the House of Saud does not want a partition of “Syraq.” It
wants two puppet regimes and control over the whole lot. To put it
mildly, Riyadh is quite “disappointed” by Washington’s
trademark foot-dragging.
Chaos is our way to go
Whatever the spin, the post-Sykes-Picot remapping
of the Middle East proceeds unabated.
Jabhat al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham – yet another
hardcore jihadi outfit – continue to be fully weaponized by Turkey,
Saudi Arabia and Qatar. That is directly linked to the proverbial
“active role” by the new House of Saud capo, King Salman.
So Assad in Damascus is fighting a pincer movement; ISIL/ISIL/Daesh
in the east, controlling at least half the country (OK, most of it
is desert), and Jabhat al-Nusra, controlling a “coalition of
willing jihadis” in the north and center. As for all those
weapons supplied by the Pentagon to the much-incensed “moderate
rebels,” they ended up absorbed by al-Nusra.
We do know that during a June 2 “coalition of
the willing” get-together in Paris co-sponsored by the US and
France to discuss ISIS/ISIL/Daesh, there was a “secret,”
behind-closed-doors discussion with the Gulf petro-monarchies
exploring what a Syria deal should look like.
Russia has also been very active on this front,
especially with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, trying to get them to force
their outfits to the negotiation table.
The problem is the GCC would settle for nothing
less than Assad in exile – either in Russia or Iran. And Washington,
predictably, would love nothing better than a coup; regime change
lite, perpetrated by Alawite officers familiar with running the
machinery of the Syrian state.
None of this seems remotely feasible, as Saudi
Arabia, Qatar and Turkey all have wildly different agendas and are
obsessed on making sure “their” rebels – from hardcore
jihadis to fake “moderates” – are the undisputed next
powers that be.
And that brings us back to the possible Iran/P5+1
nuclear deal on June 30. Syria is a key bargaining chip being
discussed behind closed doors. But as far as the Empire of Chaos
goes – not to mention the Gulf petro-monarchies – the current,
shifting, extremely messy situation is the best deal; “Syraq” fully
debilitated, war on two fronts, Iran on the defensive, and the fake
Caliphate establishing partition facts on the ground.
Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia
Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and TomDispatch, and a frequent
contributor to websites and radio shows ranging from the US to East
Asia.