Shooters of Color are Called ‘Terrorists’ and
‘Thugs.’ Why are White Shooters Called ‘Mentally Ill’?
This racist media narrative around mass violence falls apart with
the Charleston church shooting.
By Anthea Butler
June 19, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "WP"
- Police are investigating
the shooting of nine African Americans at Emanuel AME Church in
Charleston as a hate crime committed by a white man. Unfortunately,
it’s not a unique event in American history. Black churches have
long been a target of white supremacists who
burned and
bombed them in an effort to terrorize the black communities that
those churches anchored. One of the most egregious terrorist acts in
U.S. history was committed against a black church in Birmingham,
Ala., in 1963. Four girls were killed when members of the KKK bombed
the 16th Street Baptist Church, a tragedy that ignited the Civil
Rights Movement.
But listen to major media
outlets and you won’t hear the word “terrorism” used in coverage of
Tuesday’s shooting. You won’t hear the white male shooter,
identified as 21-year-old Dylann Roof, described as “a possible
terrorist.” And if coverage of recent shootings by white suspects is
any indication, he never will be. Instead, the go-to explanation for
his actions will be
mental illness. He
will be humanized and called sick,
a victim of mistreatment or
inadequate mental health resources. Activist
Deray McKesson noted this morning that, while discussing Roof’s
motivations, an MSNBC anchor said “we don’t know his mental
condition.” That is the power of whiteness in America.
U.S. media practice a different policy when
covering crimes involving African Americans and Muslims. As
suspects, they are quickly characterized as
terrorists and thugs, motivated by evil intent instead of
external injustices. While white suspects are lone wolfs — Mayor
Joseph Riley of Charleston already emphasized this shooting was an
act of just “one
hateful person” — violence by black and Muslim people is
systemic, demanding response and action from all who share their
race or religion. Even black victims are vilified. Their
lives are combed for any infraction or hint of justification for the
murders or attacks that befall them: Trayvon Martin was wearing a
hoodie. Michael Brown stole cigars. Eric Garner sold loosie
cigarettes. When a black teenager who committed no crime was tackled
and held down by a police officer at a pool party in McKinney, Tex.,
Fox News host Megyn Kelly
described her as “No saint either.”
Early news reports on the Charleston church
shooting followed a similar pattern. Cable news coverage of State
Sen. and Rev. Clementa Pinckney, pastor of Emanuel AME
who we now know is among the victims, characterized his advocacy
work as something that could ruffle feathers. The habit of
characterizing black victims as somehow complicit in their own
murders continues.
It will be difficult to hold to this corrosive,
racist media narrative when reporting on the shooting at Emanuel AME
Church. All those who were killed were simply participating in a
Wednesday night Bible study. And the shooter’s choice of Emanuel AME
was most likely deliberate, given its storied history. It was the
first African Methodist Episcopal church in the South,
founded
in 1818 by a group of men including Morris Brown, a prominent
pastor, and Denmark Vesey, the leader of a large, yet failed,
slave revolt in Charleston. The church itself was targeted early
on by fearful whites because it was
built
with funds from anti-slavery societies in the North. In 1822,
church members were investigated for involvement in planning Vesey’s
slave revolt, and the church was burned to the ground in
retribution.
Early news reports on the Charleston church
shooting followed a similar pattern. Cable news coverage of State
Sen. and Rev. Clementa Pinckney, pastor of Emanuel AME
who we now know is among the victims, characterized his advocacy
work as something that could ruffle feathers. The habit of
characterizing black victims as somehow complicit in their own
murders continues.
It will be difficult to hold to this corrosive,
racist media narrative when reporting on the shooting at Emanuel AME
Church. All those who were killed were simply participating in a
Wednesday night Bible study. And the shooter’s choice of Emanuel AME
was most likely deliberate, given its storied history. It was the
first African Methodist Episcopal church in the South,
founded
in 1818 by a group of men including Morris Brown, a prominent
pastor, and Denmark Vesey, the leader of a large, yet failed,
slave revolt in Charleston. The church itself was targeted early
on by fearful whites because it was
built
with funds from anti-slavery societies in the North. In 1822,
church members were investigated for involvement in planning Vesey’s
slave revolt, and the church was burned to the ground in
retribution.
The Daily Show - Charleston Church Shooting
See also
Charleston shooter wanted to start a ‘civil
war’: As local, state, and
federal law enforcement investigates this possible hate crime, the
roommate of the suspect said he was planning something like this —
he wanted to start a civil war.
Charleston and the South's sordid history of
attacks on black churches: The
massacre called to mind the long history of racially-motivated
attacks on black churches in the South, which have been targeted
precisely because of their role as not just houses of worship but
also sanctuaries from racism and a gathering space for community
action.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)