Austerity Is the Only Deal-Breaker
By Yanis Varoufakis
May 26,
2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "Project
Syndicate" - - ATHENS – A common fallacy
pervades coverage by the world’s media of the negotiations between the Greek
government and its creditors. The fallacy, exemplified in a
recent commentary by Philip Stephens of the Financial Times, is
that, “Athens is unable or unwilling – or both – to implement an economic
reform program.” Once this fallacy is presented as fact, it is only natural
that coverage highlights how our government is, in Stephens’s words,
“squandering the trust and goodwill of its eurozone partners.”
But the
reality of the talks is very different. Our government is keen to implement
an agenda that includes all of the economic reforms emphasized by European
economic think tanks. Moreover, we are uniquely able to maintain the Greek
public’s support for a sound economic program.
Consider
what that means: an independent tax agency; reasonable primary fiscal
surpluses forever; a sensible and ambitious privatization program, combined
with a development agency that harnesses public assets to create investment
flows; genuine pension reform that ensures the social-security system’s
long-term sustainability; liberalization of markets for goods and services,
etc.
So, if our
government is willing to embrace the reforms that our partners expect, why
have the negotiations not produced an agreement? Where is the sticking
point?
The problem is simple: Greece’s creditors insist on even
greater austerity for this year and beyond – an approach that would impede
recovery, obstruct growth, worsen the debt-deflationary cycle, and, in the
end, erode Greeks’ willingness and ability to see through the reform agenda
that the country so desperately needs. Our government cannot – and will not
– accept a cure that has proven itself over five long years to be worse than
the disease.
Our
creditors’ insistence on greater austerity is subtle yet steadfast. It can
be found in their demand that Greece maintain unsustainably high primary
surpluses (more than 2% of GDP in 2016 and exceeding 2.5%, or even 3%, for
every year thereafter). To achieve this, we are supposed to increase the
overall burden of value-added tax on the private sector, cut already
diminished pensions across the board; and compensate for low privatization
proceeds (owing to depressed asset prices) with “equivalent” fiscal
consolidation measures.
The view
that Greece has not achieved sufficient fiscal consolidation is not just
false; it is patently absurd. The accompanying graph not only illustrates
this; it also succinctly addresses the question of why Greece has not done
as well as, say, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, or Cyprus in the years since the
2008 financial crisis. Relative to the rest of the countries on the eurozone
periphery, Greece was subjected to at least twice the austerity. There is
nothing more to it than that.
Following
Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent election victory in the United
Kingdom, my good friend Lord Norman Lamont, a former chancellor of the
exchequer, remarked that the UK economy’s recovery supports our government’s
position. Back in 2010, he recalled, Greece and the UK faced fiscal deficits
of more or less similar size (relative to GDP). Greece returned to primary
surpluses (which exclude interest payments) in 2014, whereas the UK
government consolidated much more gradually and has yet to return to
surplus.
At the same time, Greece has faced monetary contraction
(which has recently become monetary asphyxiation), in contrast to the UK,
where the Bank of England has supported the government every step of the
way. The result is that Greece is continuing to stagnate, whereas the UK has
been growing strongly.
Fair-minded observers of the four-month-long negotiations
between Greece and its creditors cannot avoid a simple conclusion: The major
sticking point, the only deal-breaker, is the creditors’ insistence on even
more austerity, even at the expense of the reform agenda that our government
is eager to pursue.
Clearly, our creditors’ demand for more austerity has
nothing to do with concerns about genuine reform or moving Greece onto a
sustainable fiscal path. Their true motivation is a question best left to
future historians – who, I have no doubt, will take much of the contemporary
media coverage with a grain of salt.
Yanis
Varoufakis is Greece's finance minister.
© 1995 – 2015 Project
Syndicate