A New Dark Age
By Robert C. Koehler
May 14, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - “What struck me” journalist
Christian Parenti said in a recent Truthout interview, referring to the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, “was the fact that these local towns and states
around the region were sending the only resources they had to New Orleans:
weapons and militarized gear.
“After 30 years of the War on Drugs and a neoliberal
restructuring of the state at the local level, which is not a reduction of the
public sector but a transformation of the public sector, the only thing local
governments had were weapons.”
Parenti’s observation summed up a deep sense of puzzled
frustration I’ve been feeling for a long time, which has been growing in
intensity since the Reagan era and even more so since 9/11 and the unleashed
Bush agenda. Fear, exploited and unchecked, triggers a deep, “rational”
insanity. We’re driving ourselves into a new Dark Age.
The driving force is institutional: government, the mainstream
media, the military-industrial economy. These entities are converging in a
lockstep, armed obsession over various enemies of the status quo in which they
hold enormous power; and this obsession is devolving public consciousness into a
permanent fight-or-flight mentality. Instead of dealing with real, complex
social issues with compassion and intelligence, our major institutions seem to
be fortifying themselves – with ever-increasing futility – against their
imagined demons.
Parenti went on, in his interview with Vincent Emanuele: “So,
less money for public housing, more money for private prisons. It’s a literal
transfer of resources to different institutions, from a flawed social democratic
institution like public housing, to an inherently evil, but still very expensive
and publicly funded institution, like prison.”
As American society militarizes, it dumbs itself down.
The only surprising aspect to a recent story in the U.S.
edition of The Guardian, for instance – about how the Houston office of the FBI
broke its own rules in beginning an investigation of opponents of the Keystone
XL pipeline – was how unsurprising it was.
In essence, the FBI office violated the department’s internal
rules – “designed,” according to The Guardian, “to prevent the agency from
becoming unduly involved in sensitive political issues” – by beginning a
surveillance operation against anti-pipeline activists without receiving
high-level approval to do so. Furthermore, “the investigation was opened in
early 2013, several months after a high-level strategy meeting between the
agency and TransCanada, the company building the pipeline,” The Guardian
reported.
“… At one point, the FBI’s Houston office said it would share
with TransCanada ‘any pertinent intelligence regarding any threats’ to the
company in advance of a forthcoming protest.”
Perhaps the only surprising thing about this revelation is
that the agency has internal rules designed to keep its nose out of sensitive
political issues. Obviously, they’re easily circumvented. What’s not surprising
is the corporate-FBI alliance to stand tough against “environmental extremists”
or the agency’s lumping of environmental protests with other “domestic terrorism
issues” – its pathological fear, in other words, of peaceful protest and civil
disobedience and its inability to see the least bit of patriotic value in their
cause.
This is the case despite the long, honored tradition of
protest and civil disobedience in the United States and the widespread public
awareness of the need to protect our environment. Doesn’t matter. In the realm
of law enforcement, a simple moralism too often prevails: Get the enemy.
Imagine, just for a moment, an American law enforcement
institution that operated out of an emotional state other than armed
self-righteousness; that regarded the security it was established to protect as
a complex matter that required cooperation and fairness and was ill-served by
intimidation. Imagine a law enforcement institution capable of learning from
past wrongs and not automatically donning riot gear in the face of every
challenge to social conditions – and not automatically manning the firehoses.
What I see our powerful, status-quo institutions doing is
arming themselves against the future. Consider the enemies: poor people,
immigrants, protesters of all sorts . . . whistleblowers.
“A federal court in Alexandria, Virginia sentenced former CIA
officer Jeffrey Sterling to three and a half years in prison on Monday in a case
that has received widespread condemnation for revealing the ‘rank hypocrisy’ of
the U.S. government’s war on whistleblowers,” Common Dreams reported.
Sterling was convicted, on circumstantial evidence, of leaking
classified info to New York Times journalist James Risen about a bizarre CIA
operation called Operation Merlin. If true, Sterling committed the crime of
embarrassing the U.S. government by outing an ill-conceived CIA plan to pass
flawed information about nuclear-weapon design to Iran, which may actually have
furthered Iran’s weapons program. The government has no right to hide its
operations – and certainly not its mistakes – from the public. By pretending
that it’s defending “our” security by doing so, even as it ignores and fails to
invest in true measures of security, such as a rebuilt social safety net, it
squanders its legitimacy.
And the more legitimacy it squanders, the more it militarizes.
Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based
journalist and nationally syndicated writer. His new book, Courage Grows Strong
at the Wound is now available. Contact him at koehlercw@gmail.com or visit his
website at commonwonders.com.
© 2015
Common Wonders