You Say You Want a Revolution?
By Eric PetersLooking back on the American
Revolution, John Adams (in 1813)
wrote: “But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the
American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The
Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their
religious sentiments of their duties and obligations.”
Those frustrated by the seemingly relentless advance
of authoritarianism – especially those who’ve given up and are ready to “go down
fighting” – might consider Adams’ words.
I grant that defensive force may become necessary at some
point. Some of us, as individuals, may find ourselves with our backs to the wall
and no better option.
However, I also maintain that absent a change of heart and
mind, violence will solve nothing, ultimately. People forced to submit and obey
only submit and obey for as long as you are able to force them to do so. But
convince them, through moral persuasion, that a given thing is wrong and any
laws to the contrary will be rendered nullities at a stroke. They will lose all
legitimacy and thereby become unenforceable.
Why is chattel slavery no longer practiced in most parts of
the world? It is not because it is against the law. It is because a
critical mass of people find it morally repellent.
This is the key to everything.
The wheel turns, perhaps slowly.
But it does turn.
And we must be patient, else risk losing everything.
Consider the “war” on (some) drugs, for example. Year-to-year,
it’s hard to discern the shift, but if you’re old enough to remember the ’80s,
you will agree that general attitudes have markedly changed and with them, the
laws. How many states have decriminalized or are on the path to decriminalizing
the use/possession/sale of marijuana? This would have been inconceivable circa
1985 because very few people – most especially those seeking public office (who
had a prayer of being elected) would openly defend/argue in favor of
decriminalization, much less legalization.
Today, a critical mass of people no longer regard the
possession/sale/use of marijuana to be criminal. And, accordingly, it has become
very hard for the state to justify the brutalities visited upon those who do
use/possess/sell marijuana.
The wheel turns.
Not perfectly, in fits and starts. But it is moving in the
right direction. Probably, most people who currently agree that pot ought to be
decriminalized (if not outright legalized) are not yet ready to extrapolate the
principle to other arbitrarily illegal “drugs.” But – and here is the beauty of
it – consciously or not, they have accepted, implicitly at least, that merely to
ingest a substance, produce a substance, sell a substance – while perhaps a
vice – is not a crime.
This is huge.
Similarly, while imperfect, more and more people have at least
implicitly accepted that what consenting adults do in the bedroom – and even
whom they choose to spend their lives with – is their business alone.
We may not agree, some of us, with their activities or arrangements, but how
many would wish to see people imprisoned or otherwise have violence done them on
account of such things? In the past, you’d find many who would. Today, there are
fewer such. A great deal fewer such. The changing attitudes are reflected in the
changing laws.
Consider the philosophical – the moral – significance of this.
Of the principle that’s been – so to speak – smuggled into people’s
minds. It is a resurfacing of the old American ideal: He ain’t bothering
you. Leave him alone. The importance of this cannot be overemphasized.
Because it scales.
If one accepts in principle that it’s no crime – though
perhaps a vice – for adults to smoke pot or to engage in various consensual
sexual acts – then it is only a matter of time before that principle begins to
be applied to other things. It is the critical first step toward
conscious acceptance of the non-aggression principle (NAP), the moral idea that
using violence against peaceful people is always wrong. While
you may disagree with your neighbor, dislike him personally, believe that he
ought to do this rather than that … so long as he ain’t
bothering you, leave him alone.
Once people grok this, everything will fall back into
place. Demagogues (whether Team Red or Team Blue or some other team) will find
increasingly less receptive audiences as people begin to recoil from aggressive
violence, no matter how it is couched or justified.
It may take time for these baby steps to become galloping
great leaps forward. But progress is being made. Whether they realize
it or not, many people have already embraced non-aggression when it comes to a
variety of things that – within recent memory – most people (a working majority,
anyhow) fully agreed constituted criminal acts worthy of violent response.
Having questioned the moral propriety of some of these things, they
have necessarily taken the decision to question all such things.
It is no coincidence that “law enforcement” is sliding into
general disrepute – even outright loathing. And the same goes for “authority”
generally. People are questioning. And beginning, many of them, to see.
Our task is to encourage this. And to be patient. To resist the temptation to
lose hope – and lash out.
The wheel turns.
Give it time.
Eric Peters [send
him mail] is an automotive columnist and author of
Automotive Atrocities and Road Hogs (2011). Visit
his website Via
https://www.lewrockwell.com
Copyright © 2015 Eric Peters