What Is The Purpose Of This U.S. Fleet Concentration Next To
Iran?
By Moon Of Alabama
April 21, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - The Obama regime
claims that it wants to hold the Saudis back from further killing in Yemen:
Top Obama administration officials have failed for several
days to persuade Saudi Arabia’s government to limit the scope of its
airstrikes on cities and towns in Yemen, a campaign that authorities said
killed nearly 50 people Monday in Sana, the capital.
...
The White House would like Saudi Arabia and its Sunni Arab allies to curtail
the airstrikes and narrow the objective to focus on protecting the Saudi
border, according to a senior administration official, who spoke on
condition of anonymity in discussing internal deliberations.
The problem with this story is the acknowledged fact that the
U.S. is still heavily supporting the Saudi attacks:
U.S. officials in Riyadh and Qatar are sharing intelligence
from surveillance drones and spy satellites with officers from the Saudi-led
coalition but are not approving individual targets, according to Pentagon
officials.
“The air component is providing the Saudis intel on
potential targets that include … civilian casualty mitigation procedures,”
Lt. Col. Kristi Beckman, Air Force spokeswoman for U.S. Central Command,
said Monday.
If the White House would really want to stop the Saudis it
could simply stop supporting them. Without U.S. intelligence the Saudis would be
blind. It could stop providing more bombs and the Saudis would eventually run
out of ammunition.
The Obama regime is simply not serious about this. It does not
care one bit about Yemenis or about the expansion of AlQaeda in the Arab
Peninsula (which
renamed
itself into "Sons of Hadramout" to get more official Saudi support).
Meanwhile the U.S. is building up a fleet concentration in the
Arab sea next to Yemen. Some 10 to 12 capital ships will soon be there. Several
destroyers.
Three helicopter carriers/landing ships with a battalion of Marines each,
one air craft carrier and an unknown number of nuclear submarines. All this to
prevent a non existing threat to international shipping lanes and to stop
non-existing supply convoys from Iran to the Houthies. Claims by the White House
that Iran supplies the Houthies are ludicrous propaganda. There is
not much love between Houthis and Iran, Yemen is full of weapons anyway and
there is no evidence that any supplies have ever been provided. Why then this
propaganda and fleet concentration?
The administration has a problem. Sanction against Iran are
coming to an end no matter how the nuclear talks with Iran will end. Iran has
shown its willingness to resolve the issue. The U.S. is the party blocking it.
If there is a pact signed in June sanctions will end. If there is no pact signed
in June the U.S. will be blamed and the sanction regime will fall apart. The
Russian decision to finally provide S-300 air defense to Iran was an explicit
sign for that. The Chinese are currently heavily bribing Pakistan to get a land
route to Iranian gas. The U.S. will soon no longer able to constrain Iran
through an internationally supported "crippling sanctions" regime.
Before the U.S. attacked Iraq the sanction regime there was
also falling apart. Without sanctions increased Iraqi oil production would have
lowered the price of oil. The oil men, and the Bush administration had many of
them, would have made much less money. The attack on Iraq
prevented that oil dump.
Similar conditions apply to the Iran sanction regime. As soon
as Iran can sell as much as it wants oil prices will go down even more. The
major oil companies would suffer. The Saudis would lose market share. Is the
Obama administration willing to go to war, or to at least create some
"incident", to prevent that?
Why else is that fleet in the Arab sea? Pat Lang
fears that some new Gulf of Tokin incident might unfold. Why would he think
that?
http://www.moonofalabama.org/