Choosing Life
By Chris Hedges
April 20, 2015 "Truthdig"
- MINIS INK, N.Y.—The affable, soft-spoken dairy farmer stood outside his
70-stall milking barn on his 230-acre family farm. When his father started
farming there in 1950 were about 800 dairy farms in New York state’s Orange
County. Only 39 survive. Small, traditional farms have been driven out of
business by rising real estate prices, genetic manipulation of cows,
industrial-scale hormone use that greatly increases milk production, wildly
fluctuating milk prices and competition from huge operations that have herds
numbering in the thousands.
I grew up in the dairy farm town of Schoharie in upstate New
York. The farmers would let me pick through the rocks in their stone walls as I
searched for fossils of Crinoid stems, Trilobites, Eurypterids and Brachiopods.
I was in numerous cow barns and pastures as a boy. I have a deep respect for the
hard life of small dairy farmers. They are up at 5 or 6 in the morning for the
first milking, work all day and milk the cows again in the late afternoon. This
goes on seven days a week. They rarely take vacations. And their finances are
precarious.
When I was in Minisink recently it was the first time I had
been on a dairy farm
as a vegan. I do not eat meat. I do not eat eggs. I do not consume dairy
products. I no longer accept that cows must be repeatedly impregnated to give us
milk, must be separated immediately from their newborns and ultimately must be
slaughtered long before the end of their natural lives to produce low-grade
hamburger, leather, glue, gelatin and pet food. I can no longer accept calves
being
raised in horrific conditions before they are killed for the veal industry,
developed to profit from the many “useless” males born because dairy farms
regularly impregnate cows to ensure continuous milk production.
Once the right of the powerful to exploit the
powerless—whether that exploitation is of animals by humans, other nations by an
imperial power, other races by the white race, or women by men—once that right
is removed from our belief system, blinders are lifted. On my visit to rural New
York state I saw dairy farming in a new way—as a business that depends on the
enslavement of the female reproductive systems of animals, animals that feel
pain, suffer and love their young.
“As long as they keep
breeding back they [the cows] can stay here,” the farmer said to me as he
stood in mud-splattered rubber boots. “That is three to four lactations. We get
a few that get up to eight or nine lactations. They don’t calve until they are
2-year-olds. You add about four lactations to that and it is about seven years.
We try to breed for better production. The biggest reason for cows leaving the
herd is not breeding back. Then we send them to a livestock market and they are
sold for beef.”
The normal life span of a cow is 20 to 25 years. The life span
of a cow on a dairy farm, one whose reproductive system is often speeded up
through administering hormones such as estrogen and prostaglandin, is five to
seven years. At points during the final four or five years of their lives,
ovulating cows are restrained in a “rape rack” and inseminated with a sperm gun
that is thrust deep into their vaginas. Once their milk productivity decreases,
usually after a few pregnancies, they are killed.
As I talked with the farmer he lifted a bag of powdered milk
inside the barn. He explained that if a cow gives birth while other cows are in
the milking stalls the mother is separated immediately from the baby and is
milked. If a cow gives birth at night it is milked the following morning.
“When you separate the calf from the mother, isn’t it
difficult for the mother?” I asked.
“The animal rights people think so,” the farmer said. “I don’t
really notice.”
He conceded that the calves cry when they are taken from their
mothers but said it was “because they are hungry.”
Removing the calf “is the way it has to be done,” he said. “If
the cow gets dirty and the calf suckles the cow, it can ingest manure and mud.
There are different types of diseases it can get. There is one,
Johne’s
disease, that is really bad.”
I have been on enough dairy farms to know that at least some
mothers bellow, cry, refuse to eat and exhibit anxiety when their newborns are
taken away. And I know that newborn calves cry when they are separated from
their mothers. I can’t blame the farmer for not acknowledging this suffering. I
myself did not acknowledge it before I became a vegan. I too witnessed, but
overlooked, the suffering of cows on dairy farms. I reasoned it “had to be
done.”
Farmers often display genuine affection for the animals they
abuse and send to slaughter. They do this by normalizing the abuse, believing
that it is a practical and unquestioned necessity, and by refusing to
emotionally confront the suffering and fate of the animals. This willful
numbness, this loss of empathy and compassion for other living beings, was
something I encountered frequently in the wars I covered as a reporter.
Prisoners could be treated affectionately, much like pets—the vast disparity of
power meant there was never a real relationship—and then killed without remorse.
A culture that kills, including for food, must create a belief
system that inures people to suffering. This is the only way the slaughter of
other sentient beings is possible. This numbness allows us to dehumanize Muslims
in the Middle East and our own poor, unemployed, underpaid and mentally ill, as
well as the more than 9 billion land animals killed for food each year in the
United States and the 70 billion land animals killed for food each year across
the world. If we added fish, the numbers would be in the trillions.
Gitta Sereny in
“Into That
Darkness,” her book based on interviews with the commandant of the Nazis’
Treblinka death camp in Poland, Franz Stangl, who was apprehended in Brazil in
1967 and sentenced to life in prison, describes how Stangl fondly recalled
certain individual Jewish prisoners who worked in the camp before they were
exterminated. When she asked him what happened to those Jews, “the answer was
precisely the same, in the same tone of detachment, with the same politely aloof
expression in his face. ‘I don’t know.’ ”
Sereny wrote:
"Would it be true to say that you finally felt they
weren’t really human beings?
“When I was on a trip once, years later in Brazil,” he
said, his face deeply concentrated, and obviously reliving the experience,
“my train stopped next to a slaughterhouse. The cattle in the pens hearing
the noise of the train, trotted up to the fence and stared at the train.
They were very close to my window, one crowding the other, looking at me
through that fence. I thought then, ‘Look at this, this reminds me of
Poland; that’s just how the people looked, trustingly, just before they went
into the tins. ...’ ”
“You said tins,” I
interrupted. “What do you mean?” But he went on without hearing or
answering me.
“... I couldn’t eat tinned meat after that. Those big eyes
which looked at me not knowing that in no time at all they’d all be dead.”
He paused. His face was drawn. At this moment he looked old and worn and
real.
“So you didn’t feel they were human beings?”
“Cargo,” he said tonelessly. “They were cargo.” He raised
and dropped his hand in a gesture of despair. Both our voices had dropped.
It was one of the few times in those weeks of talks that he made no effort
to cloak his despair, and his hopeless grief allowed a moment of sympathy.
“When do you think you began to think of them as cargo?
The way you spoke earlier, of the day when you first came to Treblinka, the
horror you felt seeing the dead bodies everywhere—they weren’t ‘cargo’ to
you then, were they?”
“I think it started the day I first saw the Totenlager
[the subcamp that housed the gas chambers] in Treblinka. I remember Wirth
[Christian Wirth, the first commandant of Treblinka] standing there, next to
the pits full of blue-black corpses. It had nothing to do with humanity, it
couldn’t have; it was a mass—a mass of rotting flesh. Wirth said, ‘What
shall we do with this garbage?’ I think unconsciously that started me
thinking of them as cargo.”
“There were so many children, did they ever make you
think of your children, of how you would feel in the position of those
parents?”
“No,” he said slowly, “I can’t say I ever thought that
way.” He paused. “You see,” he then continued, still speaking with this
extreme seriousness and obviously intent on finding a new truth within
himself, “I rarely saw them as individuals. It was always a huge mass. I
sometimes stood on the wall and saw them in the tube. But—how can I explain
it—they were naked, packed together, running, being driven with whips like
...” the sentence trailed off.
“Could you not have changed that?” I asked. “In your
position, could you not have stopped the nakedness, the whips, the horror of
the cattle pens?”
“No, no, no. This was the system. Wirth had invented it.
It worked and because it worked, it was irreversible.”
“Because cruelty is inescapable in confining, mutilating, and
slaughtering animals for food, we have been forced from childhood to be
distracted and inattentive perpetrators of cruelty … ,” Will Tuttle writes in
“The World Peace Diet.”
“As infants, we have no idea what ‘veal,’ ‘turkey,’ ‘egg,’ or ‘beef’ actually
are, or where they come from. … We find out slowly, and by the time we do, the
cruelty and perversity involved seem natural and normal to us.”