US-Saudi Blitz in Yemen:
Naked Aggression, Absolute Desperation
By Tony Cartalucci
March 27, 2015 "ICH"
- "LD"
- The "proxy war" model the US has been
employing throughout the Middle East,
Eastern Europe, and even in parts of Asia
appears to have failed yet again, this time
in the Persian Gulf state of Yemen.
Overcoming the US-Saudi backed regime in
Yemen, and a coalition of sectarian
extremists including Al Qaeda and its
rebrand, the "Islamic State," pro-Iranian
Yemeni Houthi militias have turned the tide
against American "soft power" and has
necessitated a more direct military
intervention. While US military forces
themselves are not involved allegedly, Saudi
warplanes and a possible ground force are.
Though Saudi Arabia claims "10 countries"
have joined its coalition to intervene in
Yemen, like the US invasion and occupation
of Iraq hid behind a "coalition," it is
overwhelmingly a Saudi operation with
"coalition partners" added in a vain attempt
to generate diplomatic legitimacy.
The New York Times, even in the title of its
report, "Saudi
Arabia Begins Air Assault in Yemen,"
seems not to notice these "10" other
countries. It reports:
Saudi Arabia announced
on Wednesday night that it had launched
a military campaign in Yemen, the
beginning of what a Saudi official said
was an offensive to restore a Yemeni
government that had collapsed after
rebel forces took control of large
swaths of the country.
The air campaign began
as the internal conflict in Yemen showed
signs of degenerating into a proxy war
between regional powers. The Saudi
announcement came during a rare news
conference in Washington by Adel al-Jubeir,
the kingdom’s ambassador to the United
States.
Proxy War Against Iran
Indeed, the conflict in Yemen is a proxy
war. Not between Iran and Saudi Arabia per
say, but between Iran and the United States,
with the United States electing Saudi Arabia
as its unfortunate stand-in.
Iran's interest in Yemen serves as a direct
result of the US-engineered "Arab Spring"
and attempts to overturn the political order
of North Africa and the Middle East to
create a unified sectarian front against
Iran for the purpose of a direct conflict
with Tehran. The war raging in Syria is one
part of this greater geopolitical
conspiracy, aimed at overturning one of
Iran's most important regional allies,
cutting the bridge between it and another
important ally, Hezbollah in Lebanon.
And while Iran's interest in Yemen is
currently portrayed as yet another example
of Iranian aggression, indicative of its
inability to live in peace with its
neighbors, US policymakers themselves have
long ago already noted that Iran's influence
throughout the region, including backing
armed groups, serves a solely defensive
purpose, acknowledging the West and its
regional allies' attempts to encircle,
subvert, and overturn Iran's current
political order.
The US-based RAND Corporation, which
describes itself as "a nonprofit institution
that helps improve policy and decision
making through research and analysis,"
produced a report in 2009 for the US Air
Force titled, "Dangerous
But Not Omnipotent : Exploring the Reach and
Limitations of Iranian Power in the Middle
East," examining the structure and
posture of Iran's military, including its
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and
weapons both present, and possible future,
it seeks to secure its borders and interests
with against external aggression.
The report admits that:
Iran’s strategy is
largely defensive, but with some
offensive elements. Iran’s strategy of
protecting the regime against internal
threats, deterring aggression,
safeguarding the homeland if aggression
occurs, and extending influence is in
large part a defensive one that also
serves some aggressive tendencies when
coupled with expressions of Iranian
regional aspirations. It is in part a
response to U.S. policy pronouncements
and posture in the region, especially
since the terrorist attacks of September
11, 2001. The Iranian leadership takes
very seriously the threat of invasion
given the open discussion in the United
States of regime change, speeches
defining Iran as part of the “axis of
evil,” and efforts by U.S. forces to
secure base access in states surrounding
Iran.
Whatever imperative Saudi
Arabia is attempting to cite in justifying
its military aggression against Yemen, and
whatever support the US is trying to give
the Saudi regime rhetorically,
diplomatically, or militarily, the
legitimacy of this military operation
crumbles before the words of the West's own
policymakers who admit Iran and its allies
are simply reacting to a concerted campaign
of encirclement, economic sanctions, covert
military aggression, political subversion,
and even terrorism aimed at establishing
Western hegemony across the region at the
expense of Iranian sovereignty.
Saudi Arabia's Imperative Lacks
Legitimacy
The unelected hereditary regime ruling over
Saudi Arabia, a nation notorious for
egregious human rights abuses, and a land
utterly devoid of even a semblance of what
is referred to as "human rights," is now
posing as arbiter of which government in
neighboring Yemen is "legitimate" and which
is not, to the extent of which it is
prepared to use military force to restore
the former over the latter.
The United States providing support for the
Saudi regime is designed to lend legitimacy
to what would otherwise be a difficult
narrative to sell. However, the United
States itself has suffered from an
increasing deficit in its own legitimacy and
moral authority.
Most ironic of all, US and Saudi-backed
sectarian extremists, including Al Qaeda in
Yemen, had served as proxy forces meant to
keep Houthi militias in check by proxy so
the need for a direct military intervention
such as the one now unfolding would not be
necessary. This means that Saudi Arabia and
the US are intervening in Yemen only after
the terrorists they were supporting were
overwhelmed and the regime they were
propping up collapsed.
In reality, Saudi Arabia's and the United
States' rhetoric aside, a brutal regional
regime meddled in Yemen and lost, and now
the aspiring global hemegon sponsoring it
from abroad has ordered it to intervene
directly and clean up its mess.
Saudi Arabia's Dangerous Gamble
The aerial assault on Yemen is meant to
impress upon onlookers Saudi military might.
A ground contingent might also attempt to
quickly sweep in and panic Houthi fighters
into folding. Barring a quick victory built
on psychologically overwhelming Houthi
fighters, Saudi Arabia risks enveloping
itself in a conflict that could easily
escape out from under the military machine
the US has built for it.
It is too early to tell how
the military operation will play out and how
far the Saudis and their US sponsors will go
to reassert themselves over Yemen. However,
that the Houthis have outmatched combined
US-Saudi proxy forces right on Riyadh's
doorstep indicates an operational capacity
that may not only survive the current Saudi
assault, but be strengthened by it.
Reports that Houthi fighters have employed
captured Yemeni warplanes further bolsters
this notion - revealing tactical,
operational, and strategic sophistication
that may well know how to weather whatever
the Saudis have to throw at it, and come
back stronger.
What may result is a conflict that spills
over Yemen's borders and into Saudi Arabia
proper. Whatever dark secrets the Western
media's decades of self-censorship regarding
the true sociopolitical nature of Saudi
Arabia will become apparent when the people
of the Arabian peninsula must choose to risk
their lives fighting for a Western client
regime, or take a piece of the peninsula for
themselves.
Additionally, a transfer of resources and
fighters arrayed under the flag of the
so-called "Islamic State" and Al Qaeda from
Syria to the Arabian Peninsula will further
indicate that the US and its regional allies
have been behind the chaos and atrocities
carried out in the Levant for the past 4
years. Such revelations will only further
undermine the moral imperative of the West
and its regional allies, which in turn will
further sabotage their efforts to rally
support for an increasingly desperate battle
they themselves conspired to start.
America's Shrinking Legitimacy
It was just earlier this month when the
United States reminded the world
of Russia's "invasion" of Crimea.
Despite having destabilized Ukraine with a
violent, armed insurrection in Kiev, for the
purpose of expanding NATO deeper into
Eastern Europe and further encircling
Russia, the West insisted that Russia had
and still has no mandate to intervene in
any way in neighboring Ukraine. Ukraine's
affairs, the United States insists, are the
Ukrainians' to determine. Clearly, the US
meant this only in as far as Ukrainians
determined things in ways that suited US
interests.
This is ever more evident now in Yemen,
where the Yemeni people are not being
allowed to determine their own affairs.
Everything up to and including military
invasion has been reserved specifically to
ensure that the people of Yemen do not
determine things for themselves, clearly,
because it does not suit US interests.
Such naked hypocrisy will be duly noted by
the global public and across diplomatic
circles. The West's inability to maintain a
cohesive narrative is a growing sign of
weakness. Shareholders in the global
enterprise the West is engaged in may see
such weakness as a cause to divest - or at
the very least - a cause to diversify toward
other enterprises. Such enterprises may
include Russia and China's mulipolar world.
The vanishing of Western global hegemony
will be done in destructive conflict waged
in desperation and spite.
Today, that desperation and spite befalls
Yemen.
Tony Cartalucci,
Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and
writer, especially for the online magazine“New
Eastern Outlook”.
|
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note-
Translation may take a
moment to load.
What's your response?
-
Scroll down to add / read comments
|
Support Information Clearing House
|
|
|
Please
read our
Comment Policy
before posting -
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
|
|
|