Netanyahu’s Victory: Now
What President Obama?
By Alan Hart
March 19, 2015 "ICH"
- “Love him (Netanyahu) or hate him,
this is the face of Israel.” That’s how
Uriel Heilman concluded an article for the
JTA (Jewish Telegraph Agency) on
Netanyahu’s election victory after noting
that he had shown his true colours by
declaring that there would be no Palestinian
state while he is in charge. What President
Obama now has to decide is
whether or not he will allow Netanyahu to
remain in charge of American policy for
Israel-Palestine.If
Netanyahu had not shown his true colours in
the final hours before Israelis voted, Obama
would have had some wriggle room. I mean
that he could have gone on pretending that
it was still worth putting effort into
trying to get a peace process going with
Netanyahu’s Israel. But Netanyahu’s outright
rejection of a Palestinian state and his
promise to go on building more and more
illegal settlements leave Obama without any
wriggle room.
It is clear and ought to
be obvious to all that Obama now as only two
options.
One is to wash his hands
of the conflict in and over Palestine that
became Israel and walk away from it. If he
does this he will no doubt seek to cover up
his complicity by default in Zionism’s
crimes by saying, as he has said on several
occasions during his presidency, that he
can’t want peace more than the parties
themselves.
Obama’s only other option
is to say publicly to Israel that enough is
enough and that America will now use its
leverage to cause (or try to cause) Israel
to end its defiance of international law.
I think Saeb Erekat, a
member of the PLO’s Executive Committee and
the Palestinian Authority’s chief
negotiator, spoke the unvarnished truth when
he said this:
QUOTE
The Israeli elections show
the success of a campaign platform based on
settlements, racism, apartheid and the
denial of the fundamental human rights of
the Palestinian people. Such a result would
not have been possible had the international
community held Israel to account for its
systematic violations of international law
UNQUOTE
A first small step by
Obama in the direction of publicly telling
Israel that enough is enough would be a
statement that on what is left of his time
in the White House America will not veto UN
Security Council resolutions which condemn
Israel’s policies and actions and demand a
halt to settlement activity and an end to
occupation.
And hand-in-hand with that
could be a statement that the Obama
administration will not obstruct or seek in
any way to influence investigation of
Israel’s policies and actions by the
International Criminal Court.
Mitchell Plitnick, Program
Director of the Foundation for Middle East
Peace and one of the still relatively few
American and European Jews who promote the
truth, wrote this in his first reaction to
Netanyahu’s victory:
QUOTE
The only, very thin, hope
is that the United States and Europe are
finally so fed up with Netanyahu and the
Israeli right’s adamant refusal of peace
that they are finally willing to exert
significant pressure. Although it seems
likely that the U.S. and E.U. will do
something, it is far less likely that they
will do anywhere near enough for either the
Israeli government to feel the pressure or
for the Israeli populace to grow concerned
enough to take action.
UNQUOTE
And Antony Lerman, a
British Jewish writer I respect for his
outspoken support of a one state solution
(with equal rights for all) wrote this:
QUOTE
With Obama on his way out,
the EU preoccupied with internal matters,
Putin keeping the West busy with his
aggressive pursuit of a Russia first foreign
policy, ISIS taxing both the foreign and
domestic security policies of so many
diverse states, who will be able to stop
Bibi continuing to consolidate and
strengthen the de facto single (Zionist
apartheid) state?
Whether we should be
thankful for it or not, one thing we
certainly get from this election result is
clarity: the Palestinians will know what to
expect, European Jews will know what to
expect, the Obama administration will know
what to expect, the entire population of
Israel will know what to expect. Yet the
consequences of the stasis this implies are
far more unpredictable. Change was expected.
Now there’ll be none, it’s as if a vacuum
has suddenly appeared in the centre of the
polity. And as the old cliché goes, “nature
abhors a vacuum”. Filling it could be a
third intifada, as Palestinian anger
understandably erupts. It could be another
major Israeli military assault, with huge
casualties and the inevitable fallout in
anti-Jewish hostility for Europe’s Jews. It
could be a pre-emptive strike of some kind
on Iran. It could be formal annexation of
Area C of the West Bank. And it could be a
major growth in the boycott, divestment and
sanctions movement: more action and a
widening of the basis of support for the
campaign.
Equal rights for all seems
to be further away than ever. But without a
viable statist solution of any kind, the
equal rights agenda as the basis for
achieving real change gains added importance
and legitimacy.
UNQUOTE
Unless Obama can summon up
the will and the courage to publicly tell
Israel that enough is enough and then back
his words with actions, the answer to
Lerman’s question is that nobody can stop
Netanyahu advancing Zionism’s doomsday
clock.
My guess is that Obama
will wash his hands of the conflict and walk
away from it. In that event he’ll deserve a
place in history as the American president
who gave Zionism the green light to take the
region and possibly the whole world to hell.
I hope, Mr. President,
that I am wrong about you and your
intentions.
http://www.alanhart.net