Opposing Two States,
Netanyahu Unmasks GOP-Likud Agenda of Fake
Diplomacy
By Robert Naiman
March 17, 2015 "ICH"
- Congressional Republicans who are trying
to blow up U.S.-European diplomacy with Iran
would desperately like Americans to believe
that they have some alternative besides war
to the administration's multilateral efforts
to reach a diplomatic agreement with Iran.
If any fair-minded man or
woman who reads newspapers retains any doubt
that this claim is fraudulent, let incumbent
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu --
whom Congressional Republicans
constantly invoke as their Supreme Guide
on diplomacy with Iran -- put these doubts
to rest. (If the Jewish Daily Forward's
JJ Goldberg is correct in his
handicapping of the Israeli election
Tuesday, Netanyahu may not be Israeli Prime
Minster for much longer.)
The New York Times
reports:
Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said Monday
that as long as he is the leader, a
Palestinian state would not be
established, reversing his support for a
two-state solution to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
What does this mean for
Iran diplomacy? It means that the man whom
Congressional Republicans have been touting
as their Supreme Guide on Iran diplomacy has
just spectacularly exposed himself as a
diplomacy fraud.
The cornerstone of
international diplomacy to try to resolve
the Israel-Palestine conflict is that the
endgame is the establishment of an
independent Palestinian state in the West
Bank and Gaza.
Netanyahu just moved to
blow that up. He's just told the world: if I
am re-elected as Prime Minister, forget
about a diplomatic resolution of the
Israel-Palestine conflict. That's what
Netanyahu and the Tom Cotton Republicans
want to do to multilateral diplomacy with
Iran: blow it up.
It's understandable how
the Netanyahus and Cottons of the world came
to see Iran diplomacy the way they do. Until
now the world has mostly let Netanyahu get
away with being a diplomacy faker in his
dealings with the Palestinians. The
Netanyahu formula has been: pretend that you
support a two-state solution to the
conflict, negotiate in bad faith, blame the
Palestinians if you can't reach agreement.
So, perhaps it's natural
for Netanyahu and the Cotton 47 to think:
Netanyahu has gotten away with fake
diplomacy with the Palestinians, why can't
the U.S. do fake diplomacy with Iran?
Even on the
Israel-Palestine front, it's far from
obvious that the Netanyahu conclusion is
stable. Every year that passes without a
diplomatic resolution to the
Israel-Palestine conflict sees significantly
more strength in Europe for the belief that
a resolution to the Israel-Palestine
conflict will be impossible without the
imposition of biting sanctions on the
Israeli government.
But regardless of that,
negotiations with Iran are fundamentally
different from negotiations with the
Palestinians, because the negotiations with
Iran are fundamentally multilateral in a way
that the negotiations with the Palestinians
have not been, and Iran has levers to make
the West unhappy if the West negotiates in
bad faith that the Palestinians do not have.
The sanctions that are
biting Iran are fundamentally multilateral
sanctions. The U.S. cannot maintain or
extend these sanctions without the
cooperation of Europe, Russia, China, and
other countries. Only in Republican John
Wayne fantasyland does the U.S. get to order
these countries about. Cooperation with
these countries was essential to getting the
sanctions in place, and if Congress blows up
diplomacy with Iran, some of these countries
are sure to say, well, there's no reason for
us to comply with these sanctions anymore,
because the premise of the sanctions when
these countries agreed to them was that the
purpose of the sanctions was to pressure
Iran to seriously negotiate. Blowing up
diplomacy would mean blowing up the
sanctions regime. Of course, some of the Tom
Cotton Republicans would be totally
delighted, because their real agenda is war
with Iran, and blowing up the sanctions
regime would bring war closer.
This is why it is crucial
to keep Senate Democrats off of the
Corker-Menendez bill, the main Republican
legislative vehicle right now for blowing up
diplomacy. Republicans have now made "blow
up diplomacy" the Republican Party Line. It
is telling that
Rand Paul signed the Iran letter of the
Tom Cotton 47. It is telling that
Rand Paul is a co-sponsor of the
Corker-Menendez bill. The closer we get to
2016, the more the GOP is making Rand Paul
drink the Iran warmonger Kool-Aid. The fact
that even Rand Paul is now running with the
Iran warmongers increases the urgency of
pulling Senate Democrats away from them. You
can urge your Democratic Senators to oppose
the Corker-Menendez bill
here.
Robert Naiman is Policy
Director, Just Foreign Policy