The National-Security
State’s ISIS Racket
By Jacob G. Hornberger
March 12, 2015 "ICH"
- "FFF"
- The official enemy de jour that has
everyone all riled up and scared is ISIS. If
U.S. forces don’t bomb ISIS, the argument
goes, ISIS will take over Iraq, and Syria,
and Lebanon, and Europe, and Asia, and Latin
America, and then the United States. If the
bombs don’t fall on ISIS, before long
Americans will be speaking Arabic and their
children will be studying the Koran in
America’s government schools.
It’s all just one great
big racket — a racket based on “national
security,” a term that isn’t even found in
the Constitution and that doesn’t even have
an objective meaning. The only way that the
U.S. national-security state apparatus —
i.e., the vast military establishment and
military empire, the CIA, and the NSA — can
justify its continued existence is by
ginning up crisis after crisis with the aim
of keeping the citizenry filled with fear,
anxiety, and depression. The apparatus then
becomes people’s sedative, assuring them
that everything is going to be okay because
the apparatus is the only thing keeping them
safe.
Never mind that the
national-security apparatus produces the
very threats it then uses to scare people
with. After all, did anyone hear of ISIS
before the U.S. invaded and occupied Iraq, a
country that had never attacked the United
States or even threatened to do so?
No. That’s because there
was no ISIS before the apparatus invaded and
occupied Iraq. It was the invasion and
occupation, along with other interventions
by the apparatus, such as in Syria and
Libya, that has produced ISIS, the new,
scary enemy of the day.
But of course, no statist
wants to hear that. The national-security
state is akin to a god, one that is keeping
them safe from all those scary creatures
thousands of miles away from American
shores, creatures that are brought into
existence by the very policies of the
apparatus itself.
With its ongoing,
perpetual crises and wars, the apparatus is
also serving as a fount of taxpayer-funded
largess for the vast armies of “defense”
contractors who are feeding at the public
trough on a permanent basis.
As an aside, have you
noticed that while some young people are
traveling to the Middle East to join ISIS,
hardly any Americans are traveling to Iraq
to join up with the Iraqi army to fight
ISIS. I suppose one possibility is that most
everyone is a coward and won’t fight to
protect our “national security.” Another
possibility, the more likely one in my
opinion, is that deep down everyone knows
that this is all a crock.
The perpetual crises and
fear-mongering are not a new phenomenon. We
saw it throughout the Cold War, when the
same fear-mongering was being done about
communists that is now being done about
ISIS, terrorists, and Muslims.
If we don’t stop the
communists from infiltrating Latin America,
we were told, it won’t be long before
Americans are speaking communist. Cuba is a
communist beachhead, they repeatedly said,
one that was determined to turn the rest of
Latin America and then the United States
Red.
That’s why the
national-security state installed and
supported brutal military dictatorships in
Guatemala and Chile, entered into a
partnership with the Mafia to assassinate
Cuba’s president Fidel Castro, participated
as a partner in the international torture
and assassination ring based in Latin
America known as DINA, and much more — all
to ensure that the communist-socialist
infection didn’t spread to Latin American
countries, especially by democratic means.
Democracy had to be destroyed, we were told,
in order to save democracy.
The tens of thousands of
people who were rounded up, tortured, raped,
disappeared, executed, and assassinated,
were considered an societal inoculation —
like a vaccine — to ensure that Latin
American regimes and then the United States
didn’t go Red.
That’s what arming the
Contras and starting an extremely brutal,
deadly, and destructive civil war in
Nicaragua was all about — to oust the
communist-socialist regime of Daniel Ortega.
It was also what the invasion of Grenada was
all about.
The idea was that if the
radical leftists were to gain the reins of
power in Latin American countries,
especially through democratic elections, the
United States as we know it would cease to
exist.
It was all a Cold War,
national-security state, fear-mongering
racket, one that was keeping the
national-security state apparatus in
existence and, equally important, keeping
all those “defense” looters and plunderers
in high cotton.
The fact is that it
wouldn’t have made any difference at all,
insofar as the United States was concerned,
if every Latin American country went Red.
How do we know that?
Because after the national-security state
lost communism as its official enemy, many
of those Latin American regimes have ended
up with socialist presidents, many of them
duly elected by their citizenry. Consider:
Cuba, Nicaragua, Chile, Bolivia, Brazil,
Ecuador, Venezuela, and more.
In fact, check out this
Wikipedia entry entitled “Pink
Tide.” It states “In 2005, the BBC
reported that out of 350 million people in
South America, three out of four of them
lived in countries ruled by ‘left-leaning
presidents’ elected during the preceding six
years.”
Yet, as everyone knows,
the United States is still standing. The
United States wasn’t the final domino that
fell to the communists. Oh sure, we’ve got
our own welfare state, which is no different
in principle from the socialism that all
those Latin American socialist regimes
believe in, but that’s just because
Americans believe in socialism as much as
Latin Americans do, not because Latin
American regimes have gone socialist.
It won’t make any
difference to the freedom and well-being of
the American people if ISIS takes over Iraq,
Syria, Libya, or any other area of the
Middle East, any more than it has made a
difference that socialists and communists
have taken over countries in Latin America.
It’s all just a fear-mongering racket, one
designed to keep the cancerous tumor known
as the national-security state, along with
its vast army of “defense” plunderers and
looters, attached to the body politic, where
it is sucking the lifeblood out of the
American people.
What a racket. It’s
amazing that so many Americans continue to
fall for it.
Jacob G. Hornberger is
founder and president of The Future of
Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised
in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in
economics from Virginia Military Institute
and his law degree from the University of
Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve
years in Texas. He also was an adjunct
professor at the University of Dallas, where
he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr.
Hornberger left the practice of law to
become director of programs at the
Foundation for Economic Education.