Tariq Ali: The Time Is
Right for a Palace Revolution
By Chris Hedges
March 06, 2015 "ICH"
- "Truthdig"
- Tariq Ali is part of the royalty of the
left. His more than 20 books on politics and
history, his seven novels, his screenplays
and plays and his journalism in the Black
Dwarf newspaper, the New Left Review and
other publications have made him one of the
most trenchant critics of corporate
capitalism. He hurls rhetorical thunderbolts
and searing critiques at the oily
speculators and corporate oligarchs who
manipulate global finance and the useful
idiots in the press, the political system
and the academy who support them. The
history of the late part of the 20th century
and the early part of the 21st century has
proved Ali, an Oxford-educated intellectual
and longtime gadfly who once stood as a
Trotskyist candidate for Parliament in
Britain, to be stunningly prophetic.
The Pakistani-born Ali, who
holds Pakistani and British citizenships,
was already an icon of the left during the
convulsions of the 1960s. Mick Jagger is
said to have written
“Street Fighting Man” after he attended
an anti-war rally in Grosvenor Square on
March 17, 1968, led by Ali, Vanessa Redgrave
and others outside the U.S. Embassy in
London. Some 8,000 protesters hurled mud,
stones and smoke bombs at riot police.
Mounted police charged the crowd. Over 200
people were arrested.
Ali, when we met last week
shortly before he delivered the Edward W.
Said Memorial Lecture at Princeton
University, praised the street clashes and
open, sustained protests against the state
that erupted during the Vietnam War. He
lamented the loss of the radicalism that was
nurtured by the 1960s counterculture, saying
it was “unprecedented in imperial history”
and produced the “most hopeful period” in
the United States, “intellectually,
culturally and politically.”
“I cannot think of an
example of any other imperial war in
history, and not just in the history of the
American empire but in the history of the
British and French empires, where you had
tens of thousands of former GIs and
sometimes serving GIs marching outside the
Pentagon and saying they wanted the
Vietnamese to win,” he said. “That is a
unique event in the annals of empire. That
is what frightened and scared the living
daylights out of them [those in power]. If
the heart of our apparatus is becoming
infected, [they asked] what the hell are we
going to do?”
This defiance found
expression even within the halls of the
Establishment. Senate Foreign Relations
Committee hearings about the Vietnam War
openly challenged and defied those who were
orchestrating the bloodshed. “The way that
questioning was conducted educated a large
segment of the population,” Ali said of the
hearings, led by liberals such as J. William
Fulbright. Ali then added sadly that “such
hearings could never happen again.”
“That [spirit is what the
ruling elite] had to roll back, and that
they did quite successfully,” he said. “That
rollback was completed by the implosion of
the Soviet Union. They sat down and said,
‘Great, now we can do whatever we want.
There is nothing abroad, and what we have at
home—kids protesting about South America and
Nicaragua and the contras—is peanuts.
Gradually the dissent decreased.” By the
start of the Iraq War, demonstrations,
although large, were usually “one-day
affairs.”
“It was an attempt to stop
a war. Once they couldn’t stop it, that was
the end,” he said about the marches opposing
the Iraq War. “It was a spasm. They
[authorities] made people feel there was
nothing they could do; that whatever people
did, those in power would do what they
wanted. It was the first realization that
democracy itself had been weakened and was
under threat.”
The devolution of the
political system through the infusion of
corporate money, the rewriting of laws and
regulations to remove checks on corporate
power, the seizure of the press, especially
the electronic press, by a handful of
corporations to silence dissent, and the
rise of the wholesale security and
surveillance state have led to “the death of
the party system” and the emergence of what
Ali called “an extreme center.” Working
people are being ruthlessly sacrificed on
the altar of corporate profit—a scenario
dramatically on display in Greece. And there
is no mechanism or institution left within
the structures of the capitalist system to
halt or mitigate the reconfiguration of the
global economy into merciless neofeudalism,
a world of masters and serfs.
“This extreme center, it
does not matter which party it is,
effectively acts in collusion with the giant
corporations, sorts out their interests and
makes wars all over the world,” Ali said.
“This extreme center extends throughout the
Western world. This is why more and more
young people are washing their hands of the
democratic system as it exists. All this is
a direct result of saying to people after
the collapse of the Soviet Union, ‘There is
no alternative.’ ”
The battle between popular
will and the demands of corporate oligarchs,
as they plunge greater and greater numbers
of people around the globe into poverty and
despair, is becoming increasingly volatile.
Ali noted that even those leaders with an
understanding of the destructive force of
unfettered capitalism—such as the new,
left-wing prime minister of Greece, Alexis
Tsipras—remain intimidated by the economic
and military power at the disposal of the
corporate elites. This is largely why
Tsipras and his finance minister, Yanis
Varoufakis, bowed to the demands of European
banks for a four-month extension of the
current $272 billion bailout for Greece. The
Greek leaders were forced to promise to
commit to more punishing economic reforms
and to walk back from the pre-election
promise of Tsipras’ ruling Syriza party to
write off a large part of Greece’s sovereign
debt. Greece’s debt is 175 percent of its
GDP. This four-month deal, as Ali pointed
out, is a delaying tactic, one that
threatens to weaken widespread Greek support
for Syriza. Greece cannot sustain its debt
obligations. Greece and European authorities
will have to collide. And this collision
could trigger a financial meltdown in
Greece, see it break free from the eurozone,
and spawn popular upheavals in Spain,
Portugal and Italy.
The cost of open defiance,
which, Ali pointed out, is our only escape
route from corporate tyranny, will at least
at first be painful. Our corporate masters
do not intend to release their death grip
without a brutal fight.
Ali recalled that even his
late friend Hugo Chavez, the firebrand
socialist president of Venezuela, was not
untouched by intimidation from Establishment
forces. “I remember talking to Chavez many
times and saying, ‘Comandante, why do you
stop there?’ ” Ali said. “He said it is not
realistic to do it at the present time. We
can regulate them, make life difficult for
capitalism, use oil money for the poor, but
we can’t topple the system.”
Ali added, “The Greeks and
the Spanish are saying the same.”
“I don’t know what Syriza
thought,” he said. “If it thought we can
divide the European elite, we can make a big
propaganda campaign in Europe and they will
be forced to make concessions, that was
foolish. This European elite, led by the
Germans, doesn’t crack easily. They have
walked all over the Greeks. The Greek
leaders should have said to their own
people, ‘We are going to try and get the
best possible conditions—if not we will
report to you what has happened and what we
need to do.’ Instead, they fell into the
European trap. The Europeans made virtually
no concessions that mattered.”
The clash between the
Greeks and the corporate elites that
dominate Europe, Ali said, is “not
economic.”
The European Union is
“prepared to pour billions into fighting
Russians in the Ukraine,” he said. “It’s not
a question of the money. They can throw away
the bloody money, as they are preparing to
do and are doing in the Ukraine. With the
Greeks they pretend it is economic, but it’s
political. They are fearful that if the
Greeks pull it off, the disease will spread.
There are elections in December in Spain. If
Podemos [Spain’s left-wing party] wins with
Greece already having won and proceeding,
however modestly, on a different path, the
Spanish will say the Greeks have done it.
And then there is the Irish waiting
patiently with their progressive parties,
saying, ‘Why can’t we do what Syriza has
done? Why can’t we unite and take on our
extreme center?’ ”
Ali said he was “shocked
and angry about all the hopes that were
invested in Obama by the left.” He lambasted
what he called the American “obsession with
identity.” Barack Obama, he said, “is an
imperial president and behaves like one,
regardless of the color of his skin.” Ali
despaired of the gender politics that are
fueling a possible run for the White House
by Hillary Clinton, who would be the first
woman president.
“My reply is, ‘So bloody
what?’ ” he said. “If she is going to bomb
countries and put drones over whole
continents, what difference does her gender
make if her politics are the same? That is
the key. The political has been devalued and
debased under neoliberalism. People retreat
into religion or identity. It’s disastrous.
I wonder if it is even possible to create
something on a national scale in the United
States. I wonder if it would be better to
concentrate on big cities and states to
develop some movements where they can have
an influence in Los Angeles, New York or in
states such as Vermont. It may be wiser to
concentrate on three or four things to show
that it can be done. I can’t see the old way
of reproducing a political party of the
left, modeled on the Republican and
Democratic structures, as working. These
people only work with money. They do not
even speak with very many ordinary people.
It is credit-card democracy. The left cannot
and should not emulate this. America is the
hardest nut to crack, but unless it is
cracked we are doomed.”
Ali said he fears that
should Americans become politically
conscious and resist, the corporate state
will impose naked forms of militarized
repression. Government’s reaction to the
2013 bombings at the Boston Marathon stunned
him. Authorities “closed down an entire city
with the support of the population.” He said
that the virtual declaration of martial law
in Boston was “a dress rehearsal.”
“If they can do it in
Boston they can do it in other cities,” he
said. “They needed to try it on in Boston to
see if it would work. That frightened me.”
“The manufacturing of
threats manufactures fear,” he said. “It
creates sleepwalking citizens. They
[officials] never tried to do this on this
scale when they were fighting the Soviet
Union and the communist enemy, which was
supposed to be the worst, most dangerous
threat ever. Now they do it over a handful
of bloody terrorists.”
Groups such as
Black Lives Matter, he said, offer some
hope.
“Just as the traditional
left parties have been wiped out all over
the world, so has the radical segment of the
African-American population and their
organizations,” he said. “They were
physically wiped out. Martin Luther King and
Malcolm X, some of the most gifted leaders,
were assassinated. The Black Panthers were
destroyed. Areas where blacks lived on the
West Coast were flooded with drugs. It was a
well-planned assault. But the young people
who came out in Black Lives Matter have this
older spirit. When Jesse Jackson went to
Ferguson and engaged in demagogy he was
heckled. They did the same on the East Coast
with [Al] Sharpton. These black leaders,
bought off, are being seen for what they
are.”
Ali’s deep concern is that
organizations such as Black Lives Matter too
often react to events and “don’t totally
grasp that dealing with this problem of
continuous state violence against the
citizenry requires political movements.” He
worries that Americans lack an understanding
of their own history and that very few are
literate in basic revolutionary theory, from
Karl Marx to Rosa Luxemburg. This
illiteracy, he said, means that opposition
movements are often unable to effectively
analyze the structures and mechanisms of
capitalist power and cannot formulate a
sophisticated political response.
“Why didn’t the American
working class produce a Labour Party or a
proper Communist Party?” he asked.
“Repression. If you look at … what happened
in America in the early decades of the 20th
century and the last decade of the 19th
century you see that private mercenaries
were hired to stop it [political
organizing]. This is a history that is not
emphasized. This wretched neoliberalism has
downgraded the teaching of history. It is
the one subject they really hate. Politics
they can take up because they use
anti-communism. But history is a huge
problem. You can’t understand the emergence
of Syriza without understanding the Second
World War, the role of the partisans, the
role of the Communist Party that organized
the partisans and how at one point 75
percent of the country was controlled by
these partisans. Then the West came and
fought a new war, Churchill did it with
Truman’s backing, to defeat these people.”
“I was sympathetic to the
Occupy movement, but not to the business of
not having any demands,” he said. “They
should have had a charter demanding a free
health service, an end to the
pharmaceuticals and insurance companies’
control of the health service, a free
education at every level for all Americans.
The notion, promoted by anarchists such as
John Holloway, that you can change the
world without taking power is useless. I
have a lot of respect for the anarchists
that mobilize and fight for immigrant
rights. But I am critical of those who
theorize a politics that is not political.
You have to have a political program. The
anarchists of yore, in Spain, for example,
had a real political program. This new type
of anarchism achieves nothing. And probably
half of these groups are infiltrated. We
have the figures of how many FBI people were
in the Communist Party and their Trotskyist
offspring. There were huge numbers. FBI
people were making key decisions.”
Ali said that the failure
on the part of citizens to build mass
movements to dismantle wholesale
surveillance in the wake of the revelations
by Edward Snowden was an example of our
collective self-delusion and our complicity
in our own oppression. The cult of the self,
a product of neoliberal corporate
propaganda, infects every aspect of society
and culture and leads to paralysis.
“Hollywood gave an Oscar
to
“Citizenfour” and that is as far as it
goes,” he said. “As if that matters. That is
what is frightening. No civil rights
movement has sprung up uniting the citizens
against mass surveillance. Neoliberalism has
effectively destroyed solidarity and
empathy, helped by new technology. It is a
culture of narcissism.”
Ali predicted that the
current global speculation would result in
another catastrophic financial crash. This
new crash will give birth to “movements and
people who will say, ‘Enough.’ ” If these
movements build radical political programs
with an alternative socialist vision for
society, our “authoritarian capitalism” can
be battled, but if this vision is absent, if
revolt is simply reactive, things will get
worse. The epicenter of this struggle, he
said, will be in the United States.
“If nothing happens in the
United States, if nothing new is created to
challenge systemic excesses and empire, it
will be a bad situation for all of us,” he
said. “One is doomed if nothing happens in
the U.S.”
For information about
Tariq Ali’s new book, “The Extreme Centre: A
Warning,”
click here.
© 2015 Truthdig, LLC. All
rights reserved.