Ready for Nuclear War over
Ukraine?
A year after a U.S.-backed coup ousted
Ukraine’s elected president, the new powers
in Kiev are itching for a “full-scale war”
with Russia — and want the West’s backing
even if it could provoke a nuclear conflict,
a Strangelovian madness that the U.S. media
ignores, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
February 25, 2015 "ICH"
- "Consortium
News" - A senior
Ukrainian official is urging the West to
risk a nuclear conflagration in support of a
“full-scale war” with Russia that he says
authorities in Kiev are now seeking, another
sign of the extremism that pervades the
year-old, U.S.-backed regime in Kiev.
In a recent
interview with Canada’s CBC Radio,
Ukraine’s Deputy Foreign Minister Vadym
Prystaiko said, “Everybody is afraid of
fighting with a nuclear state. We are not
anymore, in Ukraine — we’ve lost so many
people of ours, we’ve lost so much of our
territory.”
Prystaiko added, “However
dangerous it sounds, we have to stop
[Russian President Vladimir Putin] somehow.
For the sake of the Russian nation as well,
not just for the Ukrainians and Europe.” The
deputy foreign minister announced that Kiev
is preparing for “full-scale war” against
Russia and wants the West to supply lethal
weapons and training so the fight can be
taken to Russia.
“What we expect from the
world is that the world will stiffen up in
the spine a little,” Prystaiko said.
Yet, what is perhaps most
remarkable about Prystaiko’s “Dr.
Strangelove” moment is that it produced
almost no reaction in the West. You have a
senior Ukrainian official saying that the
world should risk nuclear war over a civil
conflict in Ukraine between its west, which
favors closer ties to Europe, and its east,
which wants to maintain its historic
relationship with Russia.
Why should such a
pedestrian dispute justify the possibility
of vaporizing millions of human beings and
conceivably ending life on the planet? Yet,
instead of working out a plan for a
federalized structure in Ukraine or even
allowing people in the east to vote on
whether they want to remain under the
control of the Kiev regime, the world is
supposed to risk nuclear annihilation.
But therein lies one of
the under-reported stories of the Ukraine
crisis: There is a madness to the Kiev
regime that the West doesn’t want to
recognize because to do so would upend the
dominant narrative of “our” good guys vs.
Russia’s bad guys. If we begin to notice
that the right-wing regime in Kiev is crazy
and brutal, we might also start questioning
the “Russian aggression” mantra.
According to the Western
“group think,” the post-coup Ukrainian
government “shares our values” by favoring
democracy and modernity, while the
rebellious ethnic Russians in eastern
Ukraine are “Moscow’s minions” representing
dark forces of backwardness and violence,
personified by Russia’s “irrational”
President Putin. In this view, the conflict
is a clash between the forces of good and
evil where there is no space for compromise.
Yet, there is a
craziness to this “group think” that is
highlighted by Prystaiko’s comments. Not
only does the Kiev regime display a cavalier
attitude about dragging the world into a
nuclear catastrophe but it also has deployed
armed neo-Nazis and other right-wing
extremists to wage a dirty war in the east
that has involved torture and death-squad
activities.
Not Since Adolf
Hitler
No European government,
since Adolf Hitler’s Germany, has seen fit
to dispatch Nazi storm troopers to wage war
on a domestic population, but the Kiev
regime has and has done so knowingly. Yet,
across the West’s media/political spectrum,
there has been a studious effort to cover up
this reality, even to the point of ignoring
facts that have been well established.
The New York Times and the
Washington Post have spearheaded this
journalistic malfeasance by putting on
blinders so as not to see Ukraine’s
neo-Nazis, such as when describing the key
role played by the Azov battalion in the war
against ethnic Russians in the east.
On Feb. 20, in
a
report from Mariupol, the Post
cited the Azov battalion’s importance in
defending the port city against a possible
rebel offensive. Correspondent Karoun
Demirjian wrote:
“Petro Guk, the commander
of the Azov battalion’s reinforcement
operations in Mariupol, said in an interview
that the battalion is ‘getting ready for’
street-to-street combat in the city. The
Azov battalion, now a regiment in the
Ukrainian army, is known as one of the
fiercest fighting forces in the pro-Kiev
operation.
“But … it has pulled away
from the front lines on a scheduled
rest-and-retraining rotation, Guk said,
leaving the Ukrainian army — a less capable
force, in his opinion — in its place. His
advice to residents of Mariupol is to get
ready for the worst.
“‘If it is your home, you
should be ready to fight for it, and accept
that if the fight is for your home, you must
defend it,’ he said, when asked whether
residents should prepare to leave. Some are
ready to heed that call, as a matter of
patriotic duty.”
The Post’s stirring words
fit with the Western media’s insistent
narrative and its refusal to include
meaningful background about the Azov
battalion, which is known for marching under
Nazi banners, displaying the Swastika and
painting SS symbols on its helmets.
The New York Times filed
a
similarly disingenuous article
from Mariupol on Feb. 11, depicting the
ethnic Russian rebels as barbarians at the
gate with the Azov battalion defending
civilization. Though providing much color
and detail – and quoting an Azov leader
prominently – the Times left out the salient
and well-known fact that the Azov battalion
is composed of neo-Nazis.
But this inconvenient
truth – that neo-Nazis have been central to
Kiev’s “self-defense forces” from last
February’s coup to the present – would
disrupt the desired propaganda message to
American readers. So the New York Times just
ignores the Nazism and refers to Azov as a
“volunteer unit.”
Yet, this glaring omission
is prima facie proof of journalistic bias.
There’s no way that the editors of the Post
and Times don’t know that the presence of
neo-Nazis is newsworthy. Indeed, there’s a
powerful irony in this portrayal of Nazis as
the bulwark of Western civilization against
the Russian hordes from the East. It was,
after all, the Russians who broke the back
of Nazism in World War II as Hitler sought
to subjugate Europe and destroy Western
civilization as we know it.
That the Nazis are now
being depicted as defenders of Western
ideals has to be the ultimate man-bites-dog
story. But it goes essentially unreported in
the New York Times and Washington Post as
does the inconvenient presence of other
Nazis holding prominent positions in the
post-coup regime, including Andriy Parubiy,
who was the military commander of the Maidan
protests and served as the first national
security chief of the Kiev regime. [See
Consortiumnews.com’s “Ukraine,
Through the US Looking Glass.”]
The Nazi Reality
Regarding the Azov
battalion, the Post and Times have sought to
bury the Nazi reality, but both have also
acknowledged it in passing. For instance, on
Aug. 10, 2014, a Times’ article
mentioned the neo-Nazi nature of the Azov
battalion in the last three paragraphs of a
lengthy story on another topic.
“The fighting for Donetsk
has taken on a lethal pattern: The regular
army bombards separatist positions from
afar, followed by chaotic, violent assaults
by some of the half-dozen or so paramilitary
groups surrounding Donetsk who are willing
to plunge into urban combat,” the Times
reported.
“Officials in Kiev say the
militias and the army coordinate their
actions, but the militias, which count about
7,000 fighters, are angry and, at times,
uncontrollable. One known as Azov, which
took over the village of Marinka, flies a
neo-Nazi symbol resembling a Swastika as its
flag.” [See Consortiumnews.com’s “NYT
Whites Out Ukraine’s Brownshirts.”]
Similarly, the Post
published
a
lead story last Sept. 12
describing the Azov battalion in flattering
terms, saving for the last three paragraphs
the problematic reality that the fighters
are fond of displaying the Swastika:
“In one room, a recruit
had emblazoned a swastika above his bed. But
Kirt [a platoon leader] … dismissed
questions of ideology, saying that the
volunteers — many of them still teenagers —
embrace symbols and espouse extremist
notions as part of some kind of ‘romantic’
idea.”
Other news organizations
have been more forthright about this Nazi
reality. For instance, the conservative
London Telegraph published
an
article by correspondent Tom
Parfitt, who wrote: “Kiev’s use of volunteer
paramilitaries to stamp out the
Russian-backed Donetsk and Luhansk ‘people’s
republics’… should send a shiver down
Europe’s spine.
“Recently formed
battalions such as Donbas, Dnipro and Azov,
with several thousand men under their
command, are officially under the control of
the interior ministry but their financing is
murky, their training inadequate and their
ideology often alarming. The Azov men use
the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel (Wolf’s Hook) symbol
on their banner and members of the battalion
are openly white supremacists, or
anti-Semites.”
Based on interviews with
militia members, the Telegraph reported that
some of the fighters doubted the Holocaust,
expressed admiration for Hitler and
acknowledged that they are indeed Nazis.
Andriy Biletsky, the Azov
commander, “is also head of an extremist
Ukrainian group called the Social National
Assembly,” according to the Telegraph
article which quoted a commentary by
Biletsky as declaring: “The historic mission
of our nation in this critical moment is to
lead the White Races of the world in a final
crusade for their survival. A crusade
against the Semite-led Untermenschen.”
The Telegraph
questioned Ukrainian authorities in Kiev who
acknowledged that they were aware of the
extremist ideologies of some militias but
insisted that the higher priority was having
troops who were strongly motivated to fight.
Azov fighters even
emblazon the Swastika and the SS insignia on
their helmets. NBC News
reported: “Germans were
confronted with images of their country’s
dark past … when German public broadcaster
ZDF showed video of Ukrainian soldiers with
Nazi symbols on their helmets in its evening
newscast.”
Nazi symbols on
helmets worn by members of Ukraine’s
Azov battalion. (As filmed by a
Norwegian film crew and shown on German
TV.)
But it’s now clear that
far-right extremism is not limited to the
militias sent to kill ethnic Russians in the
east or to the presence of a few
neo-Nazi officials who were rewarded for
their roles in last February’s coup. The
fanaticism is present at the center of the
Kiev regime, including its deputy foreign
minister who speaks casually about a
“full-scale war” with nuclear-armed Russia.
An Orwellian World
In a “normal world,” U.S.
and European journalists would explain to
their readers how insane all this is; how a
dispute over the pace for implementing a
European association agreement while also
maintaining some economic ties with Russia
could have been worked out within the
Ukrainian political system, that it was not
grounds for a U.S.-backed “regime change”
last February, let alone a civil war, and
surely not nuclear war.
But these are clearly not
normal times. To a degree that I have not
seen in my 37 years covering Washington,
there is a totalitarian quality to the
West’s current “group think” about Ukraine
with virtually no one who “matters”
deviating from the black-and-white depiction
of good guys in Kiev vs. bad guys in Donetsk
and Moscow.
And, if you want to see
how the “objective” New York Times
dealt with demonstrations in Moscow and
other Russian cities protesting last
year’s coup against Ukrainian President
Viktor Yanukovych, read Sunday’s
dispatch by the Times’ neocon national
security correspondent Michael R. Gordon,
best known as the lead writer with Judith
Miller on the infamous “aluminum tube” story
in 2002, helping to set the stage for the
invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Here’s how
Gordon explained the weekend’s anti-coup
protests: “The official narrative as
reported by state-run television in Russia,
and thus accepted by most Russians, is that
the uprising in Ukraine last year was an
American-engineered coup, aided by Ukrainian
Nazis, and fomented to overthrow Mr.
Yanukovych, a pro-Russian president.”
In other words, the
Russians are being brainwashed while the
readers of the New York Times are getting
their information from an independent news
source that would never be caught
uncritically distributing government
propaganda, another example of the
upside-down Orwellian world that Americans
now live in. [See, for example, “NYT
Retracts Russian Photo Scoop.”]
In our land of the free,
there is no “official narrative” and the
U.S. government would never stoop
to propaganda. Everyone just happily
marches in lockstep behind the conventional
wisdom of a faultless Kiev regime that
“shares our values” and can do no wrong —
while ignoring the brutality and madness
of coup leaders who deploy Nazis and invite
a nuclear holocaust for the world.
Investigative reporter Robert
Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories
for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the
1980s. You can buy his latest book,
America’s
Stolen Narrative,
either in print
here or
as an e-book (from
Amazon
and
barnesandnoble.com).
You also can order Robert Parry’s trilogy on
the Bush Family and its connections to
various right-wing operatives for only $34.
The trilogy includes
America’s
Stolen Narrative.
For details on this offer,
click here.