Mike Huckabee: There’s No
Such Thing As The Palestinians
GOP presidential contender makes
inflammatory claim -- again
By Luke Brinker
February 25, 2015 "ICH"
- "Salon"
- Mike Huckabee has revived the
incendiary notion that there’s no such thing
as a Palestinian people, repeating an
assertion that has been condemned by a wide
spectrum of historians and political
analysts.The likely
Republican presidential hopeful made the
claim in an interview with the Washington
Post, for
the paper’s story on Huckabee’s guided
tours of Israel. (Price tag: $5,250.)
Tourists have the opportunity to hear from
guest lecturers, including Zionist
Organization of America president Morton
Klein. The Post reports that Klein told
Huckabee’s group that the idea of a
Palestinian people is a fiction — a
declaration with which Huckabee readily
concurred.
“The idea that they have a
long history, dating back hundreds or
thousands of years, is not true,” the former
Arkansas governor and Fox News host told the
Post.
This isn’t the first time
Huckabee has advanced the idea. “I have to
be careful saying this, because people get
really upset — there’s really no such thing
as a Palestinian,” Huckabee
told a Massachusetts rabbi during his
2008 presidential campaign. “That’s been a
political tool to try to force land away
from Israel.”
Newt Gingrich echoed
Huckabee’s remarks in 2011, proclaiming that
“we’ve had invented Palestinian people who
are in fact Arabs, and who were historically
part of the Arab community.” Gingrich’s
remarks attracted more than the predictable
condemnation from Palestinian officials,
also
drawing derision from Israeli historians
and Mitt Romney, Gingrich’s GOP presidential
rival.
As David Remnick
outlines, the Huckabee-Gingrich school
of Palestinian history is grounded in claims
put forth by the late polemicist Joan Peters
in her 1984 tome “From Time Immemorial: The
Origins of the Arab-Jewish Conflict Over
Palestine.” Peters’ book accepted former
Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir’s
declaration that there’s “no such thing as a
Palestinian people,” arguing that the people
who call themselves Palestinians don’t have
deep roots in the territory. Remnick notes
that even the conservative author Daniel
Pipes, whose initial reaction to Peters’
book was a favorable one, would later
concede that Peters was guilty of sloppy
scholarship and “ignor[ing] inconvenient
facts.”
Of course, there’s no
getting around the fact that the
Palestinians are ultimately an
imagined nation. But all
nationalisms, by definition, are
historical constructions. They were
not foreordained by the Almighty.
(The Rev. Huckabee acknowledges as
much, does he not?) The Palestinians
may not have existed from time
immemorial, to coin a phrase, but
neither did the Americans or the
French or the Palauans. Yet the
Palestinians exist now, and that’s a
politico-diplomatic reality with
which a President Huckabee would
have to reckon. His unwillingness to
do so reveals him to be either
embarrassingly ignorant or deeply
dishonest.
Luke Brinker is
Salon's deputy politics editor. Follow
him on Twitter at
@LukeBrinker.