Is Washington Preparing to
Wage War on Russia?
Seeing through the Official Lies on Ukraine
Truce on the First Anniversary of the US-Led
Coup
By Prof. John McMurtry
February 19, 2015 "ICH"
- "GR"
-
“We can no longer
find any willingness on the part of
Poland to conduct serious negotiations
with us. These proposals for mediation
have failed because [of ] – - Polish
mobilization.” (Adolph Hitler, 1939)
These are the words of
Adolph Hitler just before invading Poland
and then the Soviet Union. I have replaced
Poland with Russia (see below) to show the
analogy of US and Nazi pretexts.
“We can no longer
find any willingness on the part of
Russia to conduct serious negotiations
with us. These proposals for mediation
have failed because [of ] – - Russian
mobilization.”
This is not surprising
given the very significant role that major
US corporations like GM, IBM, Dupont, Ford,
Standard Oil, Chase Bank as well as George
and Jeb Bush’s grandfather Prescott who
profited big as a bank-front director for
the Nazi death machine run (not to mention
the big Nazi corporations doing very well in
the US during and after the war including
Siemens and Allianz). There were also the
deals German war criminals made to escape
post-War trials, providing 70% of NATO’s
intelligence after the war and direction to
death squads in Latin America.
After the Poland invasion
by pretext provided initial Lebensraum
of large fertile lands and an open path to
Russia for the Nazis, the invasion of
Ukraine offered a bigger prize. Ukraine was
and remains a breadbasket of the world, not
much mentioned in Western reports as US-led
corporate globalization now sweeps East. In
1940’s Ukraine, militant collaborators with
Hitler’s Nazis arose at every level to
assist in the genocide of Jews, German
occupation, killing of resisters, and
policing of concentration camps. These
pro-Nazi militants featuring Stephen Bandera
are still idolized today by their neo-Nazi
descendents whose leaders have crucial
armed-force posts and militias within
post-coup Ukraine, as reports from Global
Research like Michel Chossudovsky’s The
U.S. has Installed a Neo-Nazi Government in
Ukraine have observed. Yet mockery of
any Ukraine-fascist reality today keeps the
memory hole closed. “Dream on”, sneers
New York Times International Weekly
to the facts without any counter-evidence,
and so denial publicly prevails as Ukraine
neo-Nazis have armed militias, death squads
and the notorious Azov battalion on the
ground and cabinet posts in the post-coup
Kiev state.
All is “Putin’s paranoia”
in the Western media in a pervasive campaign
of vilification that holds the story
together through all its lies. Charges of
aggression and crime against Russia and
Putin are daily proclaimed with no evidence,
but together provide a pretext for why
“Russia must be stopped” and the US-led West
Ukraine regime armed with US weapons to
“teach Putin a lesson”. The known five
billion dollars spent on political
destabilization of Ukraine in recent years,
the covert special forces, and the direct
financing and orchestration of the overtly
fascist coup leaders all disappear into the
anti-Putin/Russia propaganda field.
At the very same time, the
descendents of the Eastern resisters to the
Nazi occupation have been resisting the
reborn Ukraine fascist forces. Yet they are
called “terrorists” now as then and
war-criminal attacks on the civilian
population and infrastructures by US/Kiev
direction have followed ever since the
illegal violent coup year ago. For months
only abuse and indiscriminate rocket and
bombing attacks attacked the Eastern Ukraine
civil resistance – until military
mobilization occurred with Russian arms and
volunteer assistance as well as captured
tanks and armaments. That is where we are
today with the resistance forces quickly
gaining the upper hand against the real
aggressor. Neo-Nazi gangs and militias are
good at terrorizing and mass murdering
civilians, and a mostly unwilling and
drafted Ukraine army can pound civilians and
infrastructures into hell with artillery,
rockets and bombs. But an impassioned armed
resistance against them of people speaking
the same language and living the same
culture will defeat them, and so it has
happened here. The February 15 truce has
been made because the Eastern-Ukraine
resistance and forces have effectively
pushed the Kiev forces, fascist militias and
mercenaries out of the Donbass/Donetsk
region. It was also possible because the US
was not directly involved in the Germany,
France, Ukraine and Russia meetings..
Is the Truce Just
a Space for the US-led Forces to Build More
War towards Russia?
No sooner was the truce
signed than all onus was put on Russia to
sustain it with none evident on Kiev or its
US master. Is it just another pause before
more weapons, special forces and advisers
come in to prop up the US-constructed coup
state in Kiev? Certainly that is what the
West-Ukraine puppet leaders and US war party
are pressing for.
Now most of all, the
connections to the Nazi past in Ukraine and
the US itself go down the memory hole. So
too does the recent warning by Italy’s
former Minister of the Economy, Giulio
Tremonti, about the new forces at work in
Europe – “financial fascism, white fascism”
(translated from his apparently suppressed
2012 book, Emergency Exit: Ending the
Tyranny of Finance). In short, all the
degenerate trends across big bank
dictatorship, corporate oligarchies running
Europe, ever more armed forces against ever
more dispossessed adversaries, squeezing
workers wages and employment without limit,
devouring attacks on public sectors and
programs across nations to privatize their
revenues, and now outright civil war in
Ukraine are at work together in a forming a
situation which is hell on earth in the long
social democratic Europe before 2008 (as
diagnosed in global depth by my The
Cancer Stage of Capitalism: From Crisis to
Cure). Ukraine is the where the war
of movement and land clearance is focused
now because the greatest resistance yet to
the carcinomic program has arisen here.
Again we might return to
the Nazi past to find connective threads of
meaning. US and Nazi justifications have
much in common. Before being able to
publicly justify Nazi Germany’s military
extension into East Europe, Hitler had to
have a pretext, to satisfy public opinion.
This was managed by Nazi forces posing as
Poles on 31 August 1939 attacking a German
radio station, Sender Gleiwitz,
inside Germany near the border. All went as
planned. And so too the movement on to
Ukraine and Russia unrolled, always to
“stop aggression” – the very same words
and reverse pretexts. And always resisters
were “terrorists”. These central concepts
are at the core of the official stories of
Nazi Germany as well as the US. But not only
Eastern Europe is thus subjugated. The US
has moved far beyond where Hitler expanded,
from Iraq to Honduras to Venezuela to
Vietnam – where does it stop? Always the
question is, “where will Putin stop?” None
stop to reflect that no Russian regular
forces have moved beyond Russia’s borders,
as repeatedly divulged under questioning by
a Ukraine intelligence spokesman, the Chief
of Staff himself, General Muzenko, and
Ukraine’ s spokesman, Major Alexander Raran,
at truce time . On the other hand while
continuously proclaiming the lie that
“Russian troops have invaded Ukraine”, US
armed forces move across borders around the
world. Where do they stop? They
threaten force everywhere, and one can
always tell that a people is resisting when
the US embargoes, threatens or bombs them –
here with doubled-troop deployments across
all Russia’s Western borders.
The difference from the
Nazis is the normal subjugation by financial
and trade levers, and slower motion of armed
forces against resistance. World rule has
already been largely achieved. But Putin,
Russia and – most of all – Eastern Ukraine
itself have drawn a long overdue line.
Russia now is no longer an open looting
basin for transnational oligarchs with a
drunken puppet Yeltsin in charge. Armed
resistance on the ground from the Donbass
region has stopped the world’s most lethal
ever war-and-money machine from taking all
of Ukraine by a US-led and neo-Nazi enforced
coup. The Nazis themselves would have kept
going. The US does not, and the fascist rump
of Ukriane is neither popular nor competent.
But the war party is everywhere demanding
Russian blood for support of the
resistance. It all started with Kiev-led
sniper mass murders in Maidan square, and
was whipped further into frenzy at the
downing of a European-filled passenger jet.
Yet Putin and Russia have not been so easily
blamed in the Internet age where facts come
out despite corporate mass media monopoly
and NATO dominance.
There is no need to
idealize Russia or Putin. Yet they do show
exceptional capacity to withstand
never-ending terror and attacks from the
West, saving the world from Napoleon, Hitler
and – so far – the US war state going East
today. The evidence of “Russia’s aggression”
– armed invading or civil destabilizing
of other countries against international law
– is pervasive for the US, but sorely
lacking in the case of Russia. Knowledge
here can win the day. The mass murder,
destitution, and oppression in Europe is
becoming ever better known, especially in
Ukraine itself, and so too the Nazi
connections. Once people awake to the worst
in fact, they will not go along with the
next big-lie pretext for aerial war and
destroying another society.
How the Quality
Press Lies for the Official Story to Stay
Believed
Today on the eve of the
first anniversary of the US-led fascist coup
in Ukraine and a new truce agreement, the
anti-Russia propaganda peaks as if to ensure
that any future violation is blamed on
Russia. The underlying US-EU corporate plan
to pry open Ukraine and Russia downstream as
undefended looting basins is kept quiet
because it is not supported by any public.
And those who serve the program do not fight
so well – as we have seen in Ukraine – when
confronted by people fighting for their
mother country and community lives. That is
why the call is so fervent from the war
party to get US weapons to the Kiev puppet
state. The official story, of course, is
opposite. The weaker is, as always, accused
of being the despotic villain that must be
brought under control, here a country with a
declining population two-thirds the size of
Brazil.
Even the academic press
gets into the reverse blame game. Yale
University Press recently published a book –
Ukraine Crisis: What It Means for the
West – which was year glowingly
reported in the New York Times,
Wall Street Journal, USA Today
and Guardian Weekly (among others)
despite its reversal of the most basic facts
of the Ukraine crisis. The serial mass
murders by snipers which began Ukraine’s
violent coup d’etat one year ago are falsely
attributed to the pro-Russian President who
fled the coup, even though EU evidence has
itself shown Kiev agency in the mass murders
and the US-led coup leadership refused to
investigate (as documented ahead). Yale
author Andrew Wilson also asserts with the
corporate media that the shootdown of
Malaysia flight MH17 killing 298 passengers
was by a Buk missile “from Moscow”. Yet the
European Union‘s Organization for Security
and Cooperation (OSCE), the chief
investigating body, has revealed no such
evidence while the plausible possibility of
a covert black-op to blame on Russia or the
Donetsk resistance is blinkered out. The
tragedy was certainly not in the interests
of the resistance because it gained nothing
and almost got war declared on it by NATO as
Kiev has aimed for all along. As always,
again, the first question of forensic
justice – cui bono? – is never
asked.
As ultimatums and
embargoes from the US and the EU continually
escalate blaming “Russia’s aggression”
without sustainable evidence ever produced,
the war-mongering by the corporate media
simultaneously increases to foment war
fever. None seem to have processed the
undeniable fact that the neutrality and
non-arming of Ukraine was promised by NATO
and the US Secretary of State James Baker
in 1991. Still the war party’s favorite
liars like John McCain and the New York
Times declare unsubstantiated
war-pretext accusations daily. So the
question arises: What will be the next
big-lie pretext for NATO and US armed
intervention?
State and media war
mongers give a hint on what is being cooked
up. Consider this paradigm example. The
iconic British Guardian and its
eminent writer on political affairs, Timothy
Garton Ash, headline a February full-page
story just before the new truce and coup
anniversary, “Putin must be stopped. Guns
will be essential”, the headline screams.
Why? “Putin is the Slobodan Milosevic
[convicted war criminal] of the old Soviet
Union [KGB communist]”, Ash proclaims. Then
he further alleges with no evidence that
Putin and Russia only “spew anti-Western
propaganda” and “if the [NATO] threat did
not exist Russian television would invent
it”. We may observe here another perfect
reversal of Western propaganda operations
onto the leader and weaker society it is
attacking. Impartial observation of the
Western press will find in fact continuous
slanders at will, while Putin and RT are
surprisingly polite in comparison. In
general, there is no standard of truth or
slander to inhibit free-roaming hate and
falsehoods against any foreign force
whatever the facts of the matter. Mass sales
of product and expensive advertising also
rise, and – key to the whole system – the
audience is churned to aggressive diversion
from their own oppression.
The Guardian
story reproduces the old lies as well
floating new ones. Putin uses “energy
blackmail” (that is, requirement for overdue
payments for gas in the billions of Euros),
and brings only “more blood and tears” to
peoples (although staying on its borders
while the US is war-gaming over 6000 miles
from Washington). The New York Times
feeds in with war propaganda from the other
side of the ocean on the very weekend of
truce (NYT Weekly, February.
14-15). It dismisses Russia’s encirclement
by escalating US-led NATO forces in six
countries and the Black Sea as a
“preposterous fable – - to generate hysteria
and buttress Russian aggression in Eastern
Ukraine”. Breathtaking erasure of the most
basic facts and reverse projection onto the
designated Enemy here combine in a paradigm
illustration of the big-lie system at work.
At the same time, news
stories have silently shifted to a new slant
– to finally report the civilians and
infrastructures of Eastern Ukraine being
one-way shelled and bombed to ruin by US-led
Kiev, but with no identification of which
side is aerial bombing and shelling
civilians and civilian targets. In this way
the US-led West-Ukraine forces that perform
all of the aerial bombing and – until
recently – almost all of the artillery
shelling of public and civilian structures
and citizens are collapsed into the general
fighting that is all blamed on “Russia’s
aggression”. The same article under the
bold-print heading of Intelligence
describes the denial of “all the Russian
forces” as “nonsense” and a “figment of the
imagination” although as we have seen the
denial has come under questioning from the
top of the Ukraine armed forces and
intelligence spokesmen themselves. The lying
propaganda techniques are a study in their
own right. The invariably feature the
elimination and reversal of facts as their
only consistent method.
The really unspeakable
fact is erased altogether, but lies deeper
still. The age-old Russian-speaking minority
of Ukraine – almost the same in language but
not beliefs – has been subjected to the
biggest ethnic cleansing operation of the
millennium. A now estimated 1,500,000 people
have been driven from their homes by one-way
Kiev bombings and bombardments of even
hospitals, schools and public buses while
stopping all access to Eastern citizens
means of existence as far as possible (not
done by Putin even in the height of the
US-sponsored war in Chechnya). The
distinction between the millions of Eastern
Ukraine’s Russia-speaking victims by US-led
Kiev bombing, terror and life means
deprivation and those in Kiev-ruled Western
territory who are untouched by any rebel
bombs and terror is simply abolished. This
is how a genocide of the Eastern Ukraine
people stays in motion while all that is
reported is “Russia’s aggression against
Ukraine”.
The Unseen
Genocidal Program of the US-Led Coup
Government
Almost down the memory
hole is the precipitating cause of the
Ukraine civil war – a spectacularly violent
neo-Nazi-led coup overthrowing the
established elected federal government of
the Party of Regions – the now collapsed
federalist party supported by most citizens
before the US-orchestrated coup. The
federalist option was thus annihilated to
cause the uprising of Eastern Ukraine which,
accordingly, was targeted for annihilation
too. There have three main methods for this
genocidal clearance operation whose people
produce 95% of the country’s coal and most
of its exports as well being rooted in a
different language, culture, social
organization and political-religious belief
system. The first has been cultural
dispossession and erasure – abolition of
past language rights and federal
accountability to the region’s people, the
initial spur of the East’s uprising along
with the neo-Nazi leadership of the coup
state. Nothing but worse to come was
promised by this stripping of cultural and
regional rights and institution of a US-led
extreme-rightist state led on the ground and
in cabinet posts by open neo-Nazis with US
support, along with a banker puppet as prime
minister who bawls “terrorists” and “Russian
aggression” every other sentence. I bracket
out proper names to ensure the underlying
design is clear because submergence in alien
names is part of the cover-up of every
deciding fact by the official story.
The second level of
genocidal method is armed-force terror by
fascist gangs and militias on the ground
committing atrocities combined with
indiscriminate one-way aerial bombing and
relentless artillery bombardment of
civilians and civilian sites, vehicles and
infrastructures – never reported in Western
corporate media even as the fleeing people
multiplied to far more than ISIS
proportions. The third and most unrecognized
method even by critics has been deliberate
mass starvation. It has proceeded among
other instruments by cut-off of all social
security and pensions to Eastern citizens,
freezing of bank accounts to be
inaccessible, stoppage of electricity, and
proclaiming “Russian invasion” every time
food lorries came in to provide water and
food to the starving people, with NATO’s
Supreme Commander war-mongering daily about
Russian troop build-ups and intentions to
invade. Meanwhile every more sanctions and
manipulations of global markets to break
Russia’s capacity to assist or to defend
escalated along with pervasively lying
propaganda (as illustrated above). Most
deeply, all the dots remained unjoined by
any public observation – with for example,
CBC and the NDP echoing the official story
daily. .
Given the Russia-speaking
citizens who have led the revolt against the
fascist-led coup and its US godfather, one
could see a preconscious reversal of history
back to Nazi-led dominance, oligarchy of the
rich and father cult in Ukraine, and hate
propaganda as again the moving force of
public opinion. As every turn of aggression
projected onto Russia has shown for a year,
economic war on Russia and cumulative total
war machinations have formed with the EU and
other satellite corporate states in a
geo-strategic trajectory interested in
“peace” only as space for more war of
expansion and ruin, automatically
reverse-blamed on Putin to sustain it. It is
difficult to deny the operationalization of
the familiar grand objective of totalizing
world rule always blamed on the resisters
against it. Certainly as in other
US-orchestrated “regime changes”, official
and media attention blame the very party who
has been attacked and never report the
catastrophic consequences on innocent
people’s lives, even when the terror and
destruction becomes genocidal in scope.
Certainly the
US-orchestrated “regime change” in Ukraine
and continuous subsequent war crimes never
reported has led to the worst large-scale
mass murdering in Europe since the Nazis,
already beyond Bosnia – another US-led
expansion of transnational corporate rule
backed by NATO bombing. The US-orchestrated
“regime change” in Ukraine and its war
crimes never reported in the Western media
has already executed a very large-scale
homicidal planning which none dares to name
in public. Consider the dimensions – one-way
aerial bombing and indiscriminate attacks of
civilians and infrastructures in the Donbass
area alone, mass starvation of millions of
mainly Russia-speaking citizens, armed-force
land clearances and appropriations, one-way
mass murder atrocities by the US-led side,
documented torture and rape by neo-Nazi
death squads and the infamous Azov
battalion, and ever more hundreds of
thousands of people forced to flee their
homes and region in East Ukraine but nowhere
else. A mounting ethnic cleansing’ has
already happened but is still unspeakable to
report in the West.
Instead month after month
the audience has been conditioned to revile
the new hate object of Vladmir Putin, and
thus to justify any life-destructive action
at all in East Ukraine. We have seen this
movie before. Always focus on the
constructed Enemy to keep all eyes of what
is being done by the US with allies to
destroy millions of peoples’ lives. It is
the DNA of this system. “Economic war” too
is ratcheted up to ever new levels on Russia
to destroy its collective life base, always
the underlying target in the
society-wrecking program of US-led corporate
and NATO globalization. It is a death
machine.
Meanwhile the immense
assets in line for military-led takeover by
the US and allies are excluded from
discussion. It is projected instead onto
Russia’s “expansionists aims”, while US-led
NATO military operations threaten war on all
Russia’s East-European borders, ever more
military training and the deployment of
special forces in coup-state Ukraine,
transfer of war instruments and directors,
contract-violating sanctions strangling the
Russian economy, and even manipulation of
global financial and oil markets to “stop
the Russian aggressor”. Yet not just the
bombs and artillery terrorize the victims of
Eastern Ukraine There has been a choking off
of their foods, electricity, social supports
and pensions, medicines, bank accounts,
humanitarian aid, and even freedom of
movement – with mandatory passes and
check-points like Israel and unpredictable
bombardments of citizens with no military
target near.
All the while thunderous
denunciations of Putin rise to divert all
attention from this one-way war on all
fronts as the war crimes multiply by the
US-Kiev axis with Harper joining in and
warmongering for more. Peace talks are
revived in February to “give Russia one more
chance” after the Ukranian representative
failed to show up at the last talks in
Minsk. As peace is hoped for by the peace
and hope president, ever more new NATO and
US war forces are installed and called for
around Russia and the Ukraine “to prevent
Russia’s continued aggression”.
What about
Russia’s Seizure of Crimea in Violation of
International Law?
The war might end if the
new truce terms are acted on by Kiev –
namely that Kiev-governed Ukraine only
regains control of East Ukraine “after local
elections in Donetsk and Luhansk and after a
full political settlement (deadline end of
2015)”, plus the further conditions of
“humanitarian aid; restoration of full
economic links with Donetsk/Luhansk,
including welfare payments and banking
services; Ukrainian state to help develop
Donetsk/Luhansk and regions’ co-operation
with Russia”.
These terms seem minimally
reasonable for any democratic social order.
But their deprivation and restoration have
been long suppressed reasons for the civil
war. It is a good sign that they are
finally made public, if the media carry
them, and finally restored to stop the war,
if the US-led Kiev wants to.
Yet so far there is little
evidence of either commitment on the US
side. So far all there is only talk of
“Russia “and “the separatists” breaking the
truce, as always. The terms themselves
expose the lie that Russia is only after
expansion. The terms allow for no such
expansion. No Western media will pick up on
this, I predict. It explodes the official
story they have been running day in and out
for a year. Yet still the terms of truce are
there for the first time, and the agreement
was brokered by Germany and France in the
EU. So it is big advance even if it is
doomed to violation under the usual false
pretexts. What will come out strongly in the
days ahead, I predict, will be that “Russia
has won by still having marched into Crimea
and seized it by force”, “Russia has
violated the sacred territorial integrity of
Ukraine and gotten away with it”, “Russia
has received a big reward for its
aggression”, “Russia has been encourage to
go on expanding like Hitler” and so on and
on. The millstone of Crimea is still around
Russia’s neck, the war crime of invading
another nation’s sovereign territory
remains, the sanctions must stay on Russia
and weapons be provided to Ukraine , and
again the justifications for continued
economic if not military war remain in place
to be repeated ad nauseam. So it is good
place to revisit Russia’s re-integration
with Crimea to consider how much of all this
holds up under scrutiny.
“Russia’s brutal invasion
and seizure of Crimea” is, after all, the
core charge on which all others rest as the
grounding fact to justify the demonization
of Vladmir Putin and Russia in Ukraine. The
justification itself is never questioned
within Western state and media circles. In
Ukraine, any questioning of Russia’s crime
here – any “public denial or
justification of the Russian military
aggression against Ukraine”, may now land
one in jail. Informally such siding with
Russia or the resistance may lead to
execution, with many hundreds have already
so murdered by Kiev regime’s killer gangs
and militias with no Kiev investigations of
them.
In the wider world,
Russia’s re-unification with Crimea with
massive electoral support – neither fact
ever allowed discussion in official state
and media circles of the US and its allies
let alone Ukraine – is sufficient to condemn
it to ruin by blanket economic and military
attacks. Ever increasing threats of NATO
buildups and war preparations as well as
war-like embargoes and violations of trade
contracts have already happened because of
“Russia’s armed seizure of Crimea” and
“gross violation of international law”
Of course what the
official story fails to report is that
Crimea has been an historic Russian port and
strategic peninsula for centuries since
Catherine the Great. The Nazi-like narrative
further ignores the fact that Ukraine’s
brief interregnum occurred by a 1954 decree
from Nikita Khrushchev, a Ukrainian leader
who was once led the Soviet Union whose laws
now apply nowhere else. Observe that this
is “the sacred territory” that Canada’s
toxic PM Harper has sworn will be retaken in
pledging “family” loyalty on the September
18 visit of billionaire President
Poroshenko. Observe too the
patriarchal-mafia intimations.
The claim that Russian
soldiers “poured into Crimea to seize it”
is, however, perfectly false. In fact, it
was a voluntary referendum with demonstrated
EU Parliamentarian-observing its
overwhelming public support for
re-unification with Russia. No evidence
suggests that the already-present Russian
soldiers involved were not models of
presence without abuse and threat. No doubt
many Tatars wanted no part, but the soldiers
did not arrive by instruction from the
Kremlin “to overthrow with brute force”.
They were already a long time in Crimea
under contract with Ukraine and in fewer
number than the undenied contract allowed.
No-one disputes any of this. Diversion from
it is the game, and lies about Putin is the
strategy that sustains it. An 83% voter
turnout elected re-integration with Russia
by over 90%. No counter-evidence disputes
this, only unsubstantiated innuendos.
In contrast, Poroshenko’s
post-coup election in October 2014 was by a
fraction of Ukraine’s total electorate with
most of the Russia-speaking South and the
East unable to participate. His October 26
snap parliamentary election was in the
conditions of more than a million citizens
driven from their homes, oligarch and
foreign money pouring in to indoctrinate
voters, and anti-communist and anti-Russian
mass passions inflamed to terrorizing
proportions. Under post-coup law, the Kiev
regime’s sacred claim to Crimea is criminal
to disagree with and liable to social
destruction – the “new Western democracy and
freedom”.
Also erased from the
official story are the facts that the
Supreme Council of Crimea referred to the
United Nations Charter and “the right of
nations to self-determination” (Article 2,
Chapter 1). This is the very right Ukraine
invoked in seceding from the USSR in 1991,
and the same right invoked for the
separation of Kosovo from Serbia – which was
in fact enforced by NATO bombing. Further
erased is the UN International Court ruling
in July 2010 that “general international law
contains no prohibition on declarations of
independence”.
Facts and laws are not all
that is automatically reversed in the
official story and repeated like 2 + 2 =4.
The contrast between Russia’s governing
treatment of Crimea and the coup
government’s treatment of the Ukraine people
is also very revealing. While the oligarchs
are setting up the Ukraine people to be
permanent debt-slave in exchange for
banker-corporate control over the country’s
life capital, Russia is far advanced in
upgrading the public infrastructures and
life security of Crimea as fast as
possible.
The Underlying
Geo-Strategic Pattern
The underlying global
pattern is that any organised force standing
against NATO-backed corporate globalization
is selected for attack and dismemberment. We
have seen this from Afghanistan to Syria in
the last decade. NATO is the combination of
all the white world powers that formerly
warred against each other. Now they have a
common cause which has switched from the
wartime-generated welfare state leading the
world to the very polar opposite under the
same name – disemploying, defunding and
skinning everyone alive without private
money stocks from Spain and Greece to
Ukraine.
The major strategy of rule
is to divide the population into warring
sides. The Republican Party has no other
evident policy in the US, nor does the US
itself abroad. So civil war was planned for
Ukraine from before 2000 as reported by
Germany’s former State Secretary for
Defence, Willy Wimmer, who has since made
public his meeting with the US State
Department in Berlin on May 2, 2000 when a
map was presented regarding NATO’s future
expansion to include the dividing of Ukraine
into Eastern and Western regions. Five
billion dollars of US foreign-operations
spending in Ukraine from 2008 (acknowledged
to a business audience by Assistant
Secretary of State Victoria Nuland after the
Kiev coup she directed) was then directly
invested in mass anti-regime circles and
propaganda and financial support to key
agents of the eventually violent overthrow.
This was not the intention of the mainly
peaceful and popular demonstrations before
February 2014 against the government of
Viktor Yanukovych, a corrupt president in a
long line. But a violent coup was opted for
instead led by neo-Nazi terror on the
ground. The terror was then projected onto
the government to justify overthrowing it,
and then onto the resistance in the Eastern
regions, Russia and Putin as patsies for
Western public opinion.
As always in
US-orchestrated “regime changes”, official
and media attention turns to blaming the
designated enemy while the catastrophic
consequences of the violent overthrow are
blinkered out. The Ukraine “regime change”
has led to massive bombings of civilians and
infrastructures in the East, deliberate
starvation of millions of citizens, and
armed-force land clearances, murder, torture
and rape by neo-Nazi death squads. This
large-scale ethnic cleansing’ has been
altogether screened out of Western state and
media reports, while the official story has
daily flailed Putin as the villain and the
cause of all the problems.
If we look forward and
backward from the “weapons of mass
destruction of Iraq”, the “genocidal plans
of the dictator Gadaffi”, and “Assad’s
chemical weapons” as a pretext for bombing
another society with major strategic and
economic resources to be pried open, we see
that the pretexts always turn out to be
false. But in every case a society formerly
independent of US dominance and doing better
than neighbours is torn apart and opened to
transnational corporate invasion.
Thus not long after US-led
bombing and destroying of Iraq and Libya on
false pretexts, another story for more war
and bombing arose. In Syria which followed a
similar pattern, president Assad was
“gassing his own people” and “violating
international law”. This story went all the
way to a White House plan to bomb Syria’s
civilian infrastructures to correct the
problem, as in Iraq and Libya – - and as in
Ukraine if the war party had won. Even with
Assad’s “war crime”, the truth found by
multiple analysis was that “kitchen sarin”
manufactured in Turkey and crude-missile
lobbed by the al Nusra jihadists allied
with the US and funded by Saudi Arabia and
Qatar (the precursor of ISIL) was the source
of the gas massacre – as Seymour Hersh
finally made public. But neither this fact
nor the plan to bomb Syria disappeared. The
mass media including the New York Times
continue to broadcast “Assad’s use of
chemical weapons against his people” while
erasing Hersh’s research from the record.
As long as all fault is
projected onto the official enemy and the
facts repressed, there is no release from
the perpetual war for economic and military
resources for more global strategic control
and transnational corporate exploitation.
Unlike British imperialism, there is no
advance of civilisation for the ruined
society. Life capital development is
reversed, and socioeconomic genocide is the
effective outcome.
How the Ukraine
Was Turned Into Civil War
The initial demands from
the Russian-speaking Donbass region of East
Ukraine centred in Donetsk were not radical.
They were rather like the demands of
francophone Quebec that have been
successfully negotiated in Canada – minority
language rights and federal status allowing
substantially independent government. Yet
minority language rights were immediately
revoked by the coup leaders. Past federalist
status for the mainly Russia-speaking region
was warred upon from the start with a new
governor appointed from Kiev. Neo-Nazi gangs
then started terrorizing Russian speakers in
Ukraine as soon as the coup was completed –
with, for example, mass murders of hundreds
of unionists and Victory Day celebrants
within months.
Bear in mind that the East
Ukraine resistance was from the same region
that resisted the Nazi invasion in the
1940’s. Now as then, only one side bombed
civilians, deployed starvation tactics, and
mass-murdered civilians. The official story
is that Putin and Russia have led all the
criminal aggression in Ukraine, but the coup
murders and atrocities, the indiscriminate
military bombing, and the embargos against
income and sustenance all came from the
US-led West Ukraine side. They had already
forced over one million people to flee their
homes by September of 2014. This was
documented by the UN High Commission for
Refugees before last summer was over, but
unreported by the mass media or Western
leaders who only bayed insults and threats
at Putin. .
Violent overthrow of a
people’s elected government, bloody mass
murders by regime street gangs, criminal
bombing and shelling of civilians and social
infrastructures, mass starvation policies,
blaming victims as “terrorists” if they
resist, anti-communist hatred a moving
passion throughout (and hushed-up
anti-Semitism), and a regulation on hand for
the slave labour of Eastern citizens – all
the ignored facts eerily recall the Nazi
invasion and nationalist Ukrainian
collaboration in genocidal operations
decades before. Certainly, a generic pattern
remains constant across contemporary
history. One society after another is torn
apart. Not only is the society decapitated,
as in Ukraine to begin the crisis, or Libya
or Iraq, or as demanded in Syria. Its civil
bonds are rent asunder, its social life
supports are stripped, its productive base
is run down or destroyed, its government is
made a strategic vassal and permanent debt
servant to foreign banks, and its
environment and resources are hollowed out.
We may recall that
Russia’s “plot to rule the world” was the
storyline to explain the Cold War, with few
noticing that world rule went the opposite
way once Russia had its GDP halved in the
grand capitalist experiment under the drunk
Boris Yeltsin. This helps to explain why the
US-led coup d’etat in Ukraine for another
neo-liberal feeding frenzy has been resisted
by force of arms. Before the coup, as US
Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland
told a business meeting afterwards, $5
billion of public money was invested to turn
Ukraine into US control. The method was a
familiar one – ever-rising civil
destabilization and US alliance with
internal extreme-right parties, in this
case, parties descended from Ukrainian Nazis
supporting Hitler, Pravi (Right) Sektor and
Svoboda (“Freedom”, formerly “Social
Nationalist Party”).
Although Europe was near
brokering a peace agreement, Nuland went
ahead with the coup, hand-picking Arseniy
Yatsenyuk as putsch prime minister and
instructing him to consult with Oleh
Tyahnybok (whose Nazi salute is well known
on the Internet) “at least four times a
week”. When reminded of the EU peace talks,
she responded in undenied leaked reply,
“Fuck the EU”. This US-orchestrated coup
then occurred after three days of sniper
murder and chaos were falsely blamed on the
elected government to overthrow it.
In fact, the sniper
murders of 21 people in Kiev in February
2014 which precipitated the bloody coup and
started the civil war were part of the
larger strategic logistics. The EU’s Foreign
Minister’s verified and recorded
conversation with Foreign Minister, Urmas
Paet of Estonia, speaks for itself. He
reported that all 21 murders were (his
words) by “the same type of bullets” and
from “the same handwriting” which could only
be from “the new coalition [in Kiev] which
does not want to investigate what happened”.
Nor did any Western press.
Reverse projection is the
master psych-op at work. Blame the enemy
for what the US is doing as the reason to
attack it. Even if the evidence shows a
big lie in motion, only a few know it and it
will not be reported in the corporate media.
In fact, such serial mass murder as the Kiev
sniper killings is grounds for prosecution
of crimes against humanity under
international law and prosecution by the
International Court. But so far such due
process of law and criminal prosecution have
been deployed only to serve the unspoken
global agenda while war-drums beat against
all those who draw a line against it on the
ground. The deprived become the Enemy
whenever they fight back.
The post-coup words of
former “Orange revolutionary” and gas
oligarch leader of the Fatherland Party,
Yulia Tymoshenko, are revealing of the
mind-set long at work leading the Ukraine
and denouncing Russia. When she was released
from jail for criminal embezzlement of state
property in post-coup Kiev, she said: “Take
up arms and go and wipe out
these damn katsaps” [Russian minority] – - –
so that not even scorched earth would be
left of Russia.” The Russian-speaking city
of Luhansk was levelled months later by
artillery, rockets and air-bombing of
civilian centres, schools, hospitals and
water and electricity infrastructures, with
350,000 forced to flee from this one city
alone by the Fall.
The Global Stakes
of the Ukraine Crisis
Harper rule in Canada has
joined the war-mongering genocidal game in
character – refusing to respond to any
diplomatic correspondence from Russia,
blocking information flows, and proclaiming
inflammatory falsehoods. The profound common
life interests at stake are unnamed by all.
Ukraine is the breadbasket of Europe and its
biggest landmass. Public assets are all on
the privatization block. Slash-and-burn
budgets are set to service new unpayable
debts to foreign banks with ample collateral
on tap. Ukraine has large and untapped
fracking-gas deposits, and it provides new
strategic military control up to Russia’s
main border and colossally rich natural
resources on the other side. Yet the
operation of reverse blame goes from Iraq to
Libya to Syria to Ukraine to Russia in one
society destruction to the next. With
one-way pervasive media abuse, cumulatively
destructive sanctions, and incremental
arming of neo-fascist-led Ukrainian forces,
vast global power and treasure are at stake
beneath discussion which affect us all.
The collapse of Ukraine’s
GDP by 60% after 1991 is evidently not
enough for the ravenous appetite of US-EU
corporate globalization. While mass media
and states chorus “Russian brute force” and
“what Hitler did back in the 1930’s” (Hilary
Clinton), reverse projection is as usual the
syntax of blame. The fire-bombing of the
House of Unions in Odessa by regime gangs
(May 2) and again in Mariupol on the
anniversary of Victory Day over the Nazis
(May 9) were major mass murders without
arrest of any of those responsible on site,
and all has been unreported in the Western
media. Yet PM Yatsenyuk with US support
keeps proclaiming “Russia’s war to take
Ukraine”, and the US war party and its
Canada servants lap it up. Public amnesia
rules by the media selecting out of public
view all facts not in the ruling script.
A new truce has now been
entered by EU and Russia initiative with
terms to resolve the US-orchestrated civil
war. All voices of the official story wonder
whether “Russia and the separatists” will
obey its terms. Yet when we examine the
record of international law and agreements,
especially life-protective promises and
agreements, who do we really need to worry
about as a violator of them? The record
tells us very plainly.
The US state has refused
to ratify the International Criminal Court
to uphold the law against war crimes and
crimes against humanity, and it has publicly
repudiated the Court’s right to investigate
US criminal violations including the
“supreme crime” of initiating a war of
aggression (including the Clintons). While
the US perpetually invokes international
laws to blame others, it repudiates any
life-protective law applied to its
actions, or its key ally Israel. In truth,
the US has systematically undermined
virtually all international laws to protect
life – treaties and conventions against
landmines, against biological weapons,
against international ballistic missiles,
against small arms, against torture, against
racism, against arbitrary seizure and
imprisonment, against military weather
distortions, against biodiversity loss,
against climate destabilization, and even
international agreements on the rights of
children and of women.
The record of US war
crimes and crimes against humanity, against
human and planetary life itself, is
suppressed. It should be foremost in the
minds of those observing what happens next
in this potential world war situation or –
perhaps at last – non-US resolution.
John McMurtry
is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada
and his work is published and translated
from Latin America to Japan. He is the
author and editor of the three-volume
Philosophy and World Problems published by
UNESCO’s Encyclopedia of Life Support
Systems (EOLSS), and his latest book is The
Cancer Stage of Capitalism/from Crisis to
Cure.
Copyright ©
Prof. John McMurtry, Global Research,
2015