February 13, 2015 "ICH"
- "BBC"
-
A day of bloodshed on Kiev's main square,
nearly a year ago, marked the end of a
winter of protest against the government of
president Viktor Yanukovych, who soon
afterwards fled the country. More than 50
protesters and three policemen died. But how
did the shooting begin? Protest organisers
have always denied any involvement - but one
man told the BBC a different story.
It's early in
the morning, 20 February, 2014. Kiev's
Maidan square is divided - on one side
the riot police, the protesters on the
other.
This has been going on for more than
two months now. But events are about to
come to a head. By the end of the day,
more than 50 people will be dead, many
of them gunned down in the street by
security forces.
The violence will lead to the
downfall of Ukraine's pro-Russian
president, Viktor Yanukovych. Moscow
will call 20 February an armed coup, and
use it to justify the annexation of
Crimea and support for separatists in
Eastern Ukraine.
The protest leaders, some of whom now
hold positions of power in the new
Ukraine, insist full responsibility for
the shootings lies with the security
forces, acting on behalf of the previous
government.
But one year on, some witnesses are
beginning to paint a different picture.
"I didn't
shoot to kill"
"I was
shooting downwards at their feet," says
a man we will call Sergei, who tells me
he took up position in the Kiev
Conservatory, a music academy on the
south-west corner of the square.
"Of course, I could have hit them in
the arm or anywhere. But I didn't shoot
to kill."
Sergei says he had been a regular
protester on the Maidan for more than a
month, and that his shots at police on
the square and on the roof of an
underground shopping mall, caused them
to retreat.
There had been shooting two days
earlier, on 18 February. The 19th, a
Wednesday, had been quieter, but in the
evening, Sergei says, he was put in
contact with a man who offered him two
guns: one a 12-gauge shotgun, the other
a hunting rifle, a Saiga that fired
high-velocity rounds.
He chose the latter, he says, and
stashed it in the Post Office building,
a few yards from the Conservatory. Both
buildings were under the control of the
protesters.
How events
unfolded on 20 February 2014
Under
attack, the police retreated from
their position near the front line
in the square, falling back along
the street on the north side of
Hotel Ukraine.
Protesters then advanced towards
the police, where they were shot by
retreating security forces and
snipers from surrounding buildings.
More than 50 people were killed,
the heaviest death toll of the
clashes between protesters and
security forces in the Maidan.
When the
shooting started early on the morning of
the 20th, Sergei says, he was escorted
to the Conservatory, and spent some 20
minutes before 07:00 firing on police,
alongside a second gunman.
His account is partially corroborated
by other witnesses. That morning, Andriy
Shevchenko, then an opposition MP and
part of the Maidan movement, had
received a phone call from the head of
the riot police on the square.
"He calls me and says, 'Andriy,
somebody is shooting at my guys.' And he
said that the shooting was from the
Conservatory."
Shevchenko contacted the man in
charge of security for the protesters,
Andriy Parubiy, known as the Commandant
of the Maidan.
"I sent a group of my best men to go
through the entire Conservatory building
and determine whether there were any
firing positions," Parubiy says.
Meanwhile the MP, Andriy Shevchenko,
was getting increasingly panicked phone
calls.
"I kept getting calls from the police
officer, who said: 'I have three people
wounded, I have five people wounded, I
have one person dead.' And at some point
he says, 'I am pulling out.' And he
says, 'Andriy I do not know what will be
next.' But I clearly felt that something
really bad was about to happen."
Andriy Parubiy, now deputy speaker of
the Ukrainian parliament, says his men
found no gunmen in the Conservatory
building.
But a photographer who gained access
to the Conservatory later in the morning
- shortly after 08:00 - took pictures
there of men with guns, although he did
not see them fire.
What happened
in Maidan Square: A photographer's story
Images
taken by a local photographer inside
the Conservatory building on the
morning of 20 February 2014
Sergei's
account also differs from Parubiy's.
"I was just reloading," he told me.
"They ran up to me and one put his foot
on top of me, and said, 'They want a
word with you, everything is OK, but
stop doing what you're doing.'"
Sergei says he is convinced the men
who dragged him away were from Parubiy's
security unit, though he didn't
recognise their faces. He was escorted
out of the Conservatory building, taken
out of Kiev by car, and left to make his
own way home.
By that time three policemen had been
fatally wounded and the mass killings of
protesters had begun.
Kiev's official investigation has
focused on what happened afterwards -
after the riot police began to retreat
from the square. In video footage, they
are clearly seen firing towards
protesters as they pull back.
Only three people have been arrested,
all of them members of a special unit of
riot police. And of these three, only
two - the lower-ranking officers -
remain in custody. The unit's commanding
officer, Dmitry Sadovnik, was granted
bail and has now disappeared.
The three policemen are accused of
causing 39 deaths. But at least a
further dozen protestors were killed -
and the three policemen who died of
their wounds.
Lawyers for the victims and sources
in the general prosecutor's office have
told the BBC that when it comes to
investigating deaths that could not have
been caused by the riot police, they
have found their efforts blocked by the
courts.
"If you think of Yanukovych's time,
it was like a Bermuda triangle: the
prosecutor's office, the police and the
courts," says Andriy Shevchenko.
"Everyone knew that they co-operated,
they covered each other and that was the
basis of the massive corruption in the
country. Those connections still
exists."
Conspiracy
theories abound
I'm certain that the
shootings of 20 February
were carried out by
snipers who arrived from
Russia and who were
controlled by Russia.
Andriy Parubiy,
deputy speaker of
the Ukrainian
parliament and
former 'Commandant
of Maidan'-
Jack Garland/BBC
Ukraine's
Prosecutor General, Vitaly Yarema, was
dismissed this week, amid harsh
criticism of his handling of the
investigation.
Meanwhile, conspiracy theories
flourish.
"I'm certain that the shootings of
the 20th were carried out by snipers who
arrived from Russia and who were
controlled by Russia," says Andriy
Parubiy, the former Commandant of the
Maidan.
"The shooters were aiming to
orchestrate a bloodbath on Maidan."
This is a widely-held belief in
Ukraine. In Russia, many believe the
opposite - that the revolt on Maidan was
a Western conspiracy, a CIA-inspired
coup designed to pull Ukraine out of
Moscow's orbit. Neither side offers
convincing evidence for its assertion.
The overwhelming majority of the
protesters on Maidan were peaceful,
unarmed citizens, who braved months of
bitter cold to demand a change to their
corrupt government. As far as is known,
all the protesters killed on 20 February
were unarmed.
The leaders of the Maidan have always
maintained they did their best to keep
guns away from the square.
"We knew that our strength was not to
use force, and our weakness would be if
we start shooting," says Andriy
Shevchenko.
Parubiy says it is possible that a
handful of protesters with weapons may
have come to the Maidan as part of a
spontaneous, unorganised response to
violence from the security forces in the
days running up to 20 February.
"I did hear that, after the shootings
on 18 February, there were guys who came
to Maidan with hunting rifles. I was
told that sometimes they were the
relatives or parents of those people who
were killed on the 18th. So I concede
that it's possible there were people
with hunting rifles on Maidan. When the
snipers began to kill our guys, one
after another, I can imagine that those
with the hunting rifles returned fire."
I have nothing to be
proud of. It’s easy to
shoot. Living
afterwards, that’s the
hard thing. But you have
to protect your country.
Sergei, one of the
Conservatory gunmen
who spoke to the BBC
on the condition of
anonymity -
Jack Garland/BBC
Sergei, again,
tells a different story. He says he was
recruited as a potential shooter in
late-January, by a man he describes only
as a retired military officer. Sergei
himself was a former soldier.
"We got chatting, and he took me
under his wing. He saw something in me
that he liked. Officers are like
psychologists, they can see who is
capable. He kept me close."
The former officer dissuaded him from
joining any of the more militant groups
active on the Maidan.
"'Your time will come,' he said."
Was he being prepared,
psychologically, to take up arms?
"Not that we sat down and worked out
a plan. But we talked about it privately
and he prepared me for it."
It is not clear who the man who
apparently recruited Sergei was, or
whether he belonged to any of the
recognised groups active on the Maidan.
And there is much else that we still
do not know, such as who fired the first
shots on 20 February.
As for conspiracy theories, it is
possible that Sergei was manipulated,
played like a pawn in a bigger game. But
that is not the way he sees it. He was a
simple protester, he says, who took up
arms in self-defence.
"I didn't want to shoot anyone or
kill anyone. But that was the situation.
I don't feel like some kind of hero. The
opposite: I have trouble sleeping, bad
premonitions. I'm trying to control
myself. But I just get nervous all the
time. I have nothing to be proud of.
It's easy to shoot. Living afterwards,
that's the hard thing. But you have to
defend your country."
You can watch a longer video
report by Gabriel Gatehouse
here and listen to a radio
documentary
here.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)