Europe Wary of US ‘All
Options’ Threat to Russia
By Finian Cunningham
February 08, 2015 "ICH"
- "SCF"-
The Ukraine crisis dominated the weekend’s
Munich Security Conference with German
Chancellor Angela Merkel playing host to
European and American leaders, as well as
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
Merkel had just returned from Moscow where
she reportedly had a four-hour meeting with
Russian President Vladimir Putin along with
French leader Francois Hollande. Respective
spokesmen described those talks as
constructive but would not divulge any
details, suggesting that an earnest dialogue
is indeed underway between Moscow, Berlin
and Paris to find a peaceful settlement to
the Ukraine conflict. Hollande said, with
urgent tone, that the peace bid was a last
chance to avert “total war”.
The BBC reported that Merkel,
Hollande and Putin were “upbeat” on the
latest tripartite peace efforts succeeding.
Well, “upbeat” may be a bit premature, if
the Americans have anything to do with it.
What has probably galvanised
the European leaders to push the diplomatic
envelope is the reckless proposal from
Washington earlier in the week to send more
military weapons to the Kiev regime.
Notably, Berlin and Paris said they were
against supplying any more arms into the
Ukraine crisis. Even the British government,
normally a stalwart ally of Washington,
voiced objection to the latest American
weapons proposal. Moscow also warned
Washington of the gravity, saying that if
the US were to step up its military support
for Kiev, that would result in “colossal
damage to relations”.
Everyone except the gung-ho
Americans and the swivel-eyed neo-Nazi Kiev
junta realise that a stepwise increase in US
weapons to Ukraine would mark a rubicon
moment, where the US is piling into open war
on Russia’s vital interests.
While Merkel and Hollande
were earnestly endeavouring to find a
peaceful way out of the impasse with Putin,
it was apparent that a significant
divergence between Europe and Washington had
emerged.
The absence of US Secretary
of State John Kerry from the meetings
between Merkel, Hollande and Putin was a
glaring sign of this divergence. The Western
media were trying to spin a sort of American
association with the peace effort, saying
that Kerry welcomed the latest peace
initiative as “helpful”. The New York Times
ran this hollow headline: ‘US and Europe
Working to End Ukraine Conflict’. But
Kerry’s absence from the Moscow meeting
between Merkel, Hollande and Putin told
another story.
Back in Munich, American Vice
President Joe Biden seemed to be doing his
best to provoke Russia with more outrageous
slander. Biden was telling delegates that
“Russia was escalating the conflict” and
“Ukraine was fighting for its very
survival”. He also said European questioning
of US-led sanctions against Russia were
“annoying and inappropriate” and that Europe
must stand firm against Russian threats to
“redraw the map of Europe”.
John Kerry, meanwhile, was
provocatively saying that “Russia must end
the bloodshed or we will send arms to
Ukraine”. He described Russia as “the
biggest threat” to Ukraine.
This is the Americans
delivering a self-fulfilling ultimatum to
Moscow. Russia has no control over the
violence in Ukraine because, despite NATO
propaganda, it is not involved, beyond
diplomatically supporting the ethnic
Russians of eastern Ukraine in their fight
against the Western-backed Kiev regime. It
is the Kiev regime that controls the
violence. It launched the war in the first
place and has refused to enter into a mutual
dialogue with the separatists in order to
bring an end to the violence, which has
claimed over 5,400 lives in the past 10
months.
Kerry’s stated refusal this
week to meet with the leaders of the
self-declared people’s republics of Donetsk
and Luhansk is grist for the Kiev mill of
continuing hostility. So, from the US-Kiev
dynamic, the violence will continue,
unfortunately, and Washington will present
that as further “proof” of “Russian-backed
insurgency”, which will be used to justify
supplying more American weaponry, which will
lead to more violence, and so on.
The threat of American
military escalation is being articulated as
“keeping all options on the table”. The US
State Department earlier this week said that
proposals from various Washington officials,
including John Kerry and incoming Defence
Secretary Ashton Carter, for increasing
military supplies to Kiev were being
considered. “We reserve the right to keep a
range of options on the table,” said Jen
Psaki, the State Department spokeswoman.
The same formula of
threatening words was reiterated by NATO
Supreme Commander General Philip Breedlove
at the Munich Security Conference. The
American four-star general told France 24 in
an interview that “all options” of using
military force must be kept open with regard
to the Ukraine crisis and defending against
“Russian aggression”.
Breedlove’s choice of words
and policy shows how much NATO is really an
instrument of Washington, and not “the
alliance” between America and Europe that
its grandiloquent name pretends.
Of course, Breedlove, like
his political colleagues in Washington, was
saying that his priority was for diplomacy.
But it is clear that the Americans, despite
their words of support for dialogue, are
pushing a military confrontation with Russia
over Ukraine.
“Keeping all options on the
table” with regard to whether it was going
to send lethal military equipment to the
Kiev regime is an aggressive ultimatum.
In the same breath,
Washington says it doesn’t want a proxy war
with Russia and that it is giving priority
to diplomatic means to resolve the nearly
year-old conflict in Ukraine. No-one can
possibly believe the weasel words that
habitually come out of Washington. A proxy
war is exactly what the Americans are
pushing – for all intents and purposes,
whatever the cynical rhetoric about
“diplomatic solutions”.
But here’s the thing: the
Europeans seem to be waking up to the fact
that they stand to lose far more than
Washington if the latter’s agenda for
escalating violence continues.
An all-out war on the
European landmass is an obvious calamity for
the European Union. But even as it is,
before an all-out war erupts, the EU is
suffering far more from US-led hostilities
than America would ever incur. With
EU-Russia trade standing at ten times the
volume of US-Russia trade, the Europeans
have much more to lose. And are losing
already –painfully.
Germany is the biggest EU
loser from the confrontation with Russia
over Ukraine. German exports to Russia are
projected to fall by 20 per cent this year
compared with the previous year. That
amounts to a gaping shortfall of €8 billion
to the Germany economy. And what’s bad for
Germany is equally bad for the economic
prospects of the whole EU, mired as it is in
recession and increasing unemployment across
the 28-member bloc.
Eckhard Cordes, Chairman of
the Committee on Eastern European Economic
Relations, said of the deteriorating impact
on the Germany economy from the US-led trade
sanctions on Russia: “We estimate that in
Germany 300,000 workers work for Russian
exports. As exports have gone down by almost
20 percent...in this respect [we] lost 60
000 jobs. So we expect a further decrease of
exports with a negative impact on jobs in
Germany,” added Cordes.
American politicians may be
talking peace out the side of their mouths,
but their full-throated bellicose “all
options” threat to Russia speaks of a very
different agenda – one of escalating
hostilities.
Like the American
self-righteous license to endlessly print
worthless dollars and run-up trillions of
unpaid national debt, Washington expects the
rest of the world to bear its insufferable
recklessness over Ukraine and toward Russia
and Europe. There are growing signs,
however, that the Europeans are at last
beginning to wake up to the cataclysmic
danger of kowtowing to Washington.
The latest peace bid from
Merkel and Hollande engaging Putin without
the Americans involved is a clear sign that
Europe is becoming increasingly wary and
despairing of Washington’s drive for war.
© Strategic Culture
Foundation