War Is the New Normal
Seven Deadly Reasons Why America’s Wars
Persist
By William J. Astore
February 02, 2015 "ICH"
- It was launched immediately after the 9/11
attacks, when I was still in the military,
and almost immediately became known as the
Global War on Terror, or GWOT. Pentagon
insiders called it “the
long war,” an open-ended, perhaps
unending, conflict against nations and
terror networks mainly of a radical Islamist
bent. It saw the revival of
counterinsurgency doctrine, buried in the
aftermath of defeat in Vietnam, and a
reinterpretation of that disaster as
well. Over the years, its chief
characteristic became ever clearer: a “Groundhog
Day” kind of repetition. Just when you
thought it was over (Iraq,
Afghanistan), just after victory (of a
sort) was declared, it
began again.
Now, as we find ourselves enmeshed in Iraq
War 3.0, what better way to memorialize the
post-9/11 American way of war than through
repetition. Back in July 2010, I wrote an
article for TomDispatch on the
seven reasons why America can’t stop
making war. More than four years later,
with the war on terror still ongoing, with
the mission eternally unaccomplished, here’s
a fresh take on the top seven reasons why
never-ending war is the new normal in
America. In this sequel, I make only one
promise: no declarations of victory (and
mark it on your calendars, I’m planning to
be back with seven new reasons in 2019).
1. The
privatization of war:
The U.S. military’s recourse to
private contractors has strengthened the
profit motive for war-making and prolonged
wars as well. Unlike the citizen-soldiers
of past eras, the mobilized
warrior corporations of America’s new
mercenary moment -- the
Halliburton/KBRs (nearly
$40 billion in contracts for the Iraq
War alone), the
DynCorps ($4.1 billion to train 150,000
Iraqi police), and the
Blackwater/Xe/Academis ($1.3 billion in
Iraq, along with
boatloads of controversy) -- have no
incentive to demobilize. Like most
corporations, their business model is based
on profit through growth, and growth is most
rapid when wars and preparations for more of
them are the favored options in Washington.
"Freedom
isn’t free," as a popular conservative
bumper sticker puts it, and neither is war.
My father liked the saying, “He who pays the
piper calls the tune,” and today’s mercenary
corporations have been calling for a lot of
military marches piping in $138 billion in
contracts for Iraq alone,
according to the Financial Times.
And if you think that the privatization of
war must at least reduce government waste,
think again: the Commission on Wartime
Contracting in Iraq and
Afghanistan estimated in 2011 that fraud,
waste, and abuse accounted for
up to $60 billion of the money spent in
Iraq alone.
To corral American-style
war, the mercenaries must be defanged or
deflated. European rulers learned this the
hard way during the Thirty Years’ War of the
seventeenth century. At that time, powerful
mercenary captains like
Albrecht von Wallenstein ran amok. Only
Wallenstein’s assassination and the
assertion of near absolutist powers by
monarchs bent on curbing war before they
went bankrupt finally brought the
mercenaries to heel, a victory as hard won
as it was essential to Europe’s survival and
eventual expansion. (Europeans then
exported their wars to foreign shores, but
that’s another story.)
2. The embrace of
the national security state by both major
parties:
Jimmy Carter was the last president to
attempt to exercise any kind of control over
the national security state. A former Navy
nuclear engineer who had served under the
demanding
Admiral Hyman Rickover, Carter cancelled
the B-1 bomber and fought for a U.S. foreign
policy based on human rights. Widely
pilloried for
talking about nuclear war with his young
daughter Amy, Carter was further attacked
for being “weak” on defense. His defeat by
Ronald Reagan in 1980 inaugurated 12 years
of dominance by Republican presidents that
opened the financial floodgates for the
Department of Defense. That taught Bill
Clinton and the
Democratic Leadership Council a lesson
when it came to the wisdom of wrapping the
national security state in a welcoming
embrace, which they did, however
uncomfortably. This expedient turn to the
right by the Democrats in the Clinton years
served as a temporary booster shot when it
came to charges of being “soft” on defense
-- until Republicans upped the ante by going
“all-in” on military crusades in the
aftermath of 9/11.
Since his election in
2008, Barack Obama has done little to alter
the course set by his predecessors. He,
too, has chosen not to challenge
Washington’s prevailing
catechism of war. Republicans have
responded, however, not by muting their
criticism, but by upping the ante yet
again. How else to explain House Speaker
John Boehner’s invitation to Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address a
joint session of Congress
in March? That address promises to be a
pep talk for the Republicans, as well as a
smack down of the Obama administration and
its “appeasenik”
policies toward Iran and Islamic radicalism.
Serious oversight, let
alone opposition to the national security
state by Congress or a mainstream political
party, has been
missing in action for years and must
now, in the wake of the Senate Torture
Report fiasco (from which the CIA
emerged stronger, not weaker), be
presumed dead. The recent midterm election
triumph of Republican war hawks and the
prospective lineup of candidates for
president in 2016 does not bode well when it
comes to reining in the national security
state in any foreseeable future.
3. “Support Our
Troops” as a substitute for thought.
You’ve seen them everywhere: “Support
Our Troops” stickers. In fact, the
“support” in that slogan generally means
acquiescence when it comes to American-style
war. The truth is that we’ve turned the
all-volunteer military into something like a
foreign legion, deploying it again and
again to our distant battle zones and
driving it
into the ground in wars that amount to
strategic folly. Instead of admitting their
mistakes, America’s leaders have worked to
obscure them by endlessly
overpraising our “warriors” as so many
universal heroes. This may salve our
collective national conscience, but it’s a
form of
cheap grace that saves no lives -- and
wins no wars.
Instead, this country
needs to listen more carefully to its
troops, especially the war critics who have
risked their lives while fighting overseas.
Organizations like
Iraq Veterans Against the War and
Veterans for Peace are good places to
start.
4. Fighting a
redacted war.
War, like the recent
Senate torture report, is redacted in
America. Its horrors and mistakes are
suppressed, its patriotic whistleblowers
punished, even as the American people
are kept in a demobilized state. The act of
going to war no longer represents the
will of the people, as represented by
formal Congressional declarations of war as
the U.S. Constitution demands. Instead, in
these years, Americans were told to
go to Disney World (as George W. Bush
suggested in the wake of 9/11) and keep
shopping. They’re encouraged not to
pay too much attention to war’s
casualties and costs, especially when those
costs involve foreigners with funny-sounding
names (after all, they are, as
American sniper Chris Kyle so
indelicately put it in his book, just
“savages”).
Redacted war hides the
true cost of a permanent state of killing
from the American people, if not from
foreign observers. Ignorance and apathy
reign, even as a
national security state that is
essentially a
shadow government equates its growth
with your safety.
5. Threat
inflation:
There’s nothing new about threat inflation.
We saw plenty of it during the Cold War
(nonexistent
missile and
bomber gaps, for example). Fear sells
and we’ve had quite a
dose of it in the twenty-first century,
from ISIS to Ebola. But a more important
truth is that fear is a mind-killer, a
debate-stifler.
Back in September, for
example, Senator Lindsey Graham warned that
ISIS and its radical Islamic army was coming
to America
to kill us all. ISIS, of course, is a
regional power with no ability to mount
significant operations against the United
States. But fear is so commonplace, so
effectively stoked in this country that
Americans routinely
and wildly exaggerate the threat posed
by al-Qaeda or ISIS or the bogeyman du
jour.
Decades ago, as a young
lieutenant in the Air Force, I was hunkered
down in
Cheyenne Mountain during the Cold War.
It was the ultimate
citadel-cum-bomb-shelter, and those in it
were believed to have a 70% likelihood of
surviving a five-megaton nuclear blast.
There, not surprisingly, I found myself
contemplating the very real possibility of a
thermonuclear exchange with the Soviet
Union, a war that would have annihilated
life as we knew it, indeed much of life on
our planet thanks to the phenomenon of
nuclear winter. You’ll excuse me for not
shaking in my boots at the threat of ISIS
coming to get me. Or of Sharia Law coming
to my local town hall. With respect to such
fears, America needs, as Hillary Clinton
said in an admittedly different context, to
“grow
a pair.”
6. Defining the
world as a global battlefield:
In
fortress America, all realms have by now
become battle spheres. Not only much of the
planet, the seas,
air, and space, as well as the country’s
borders and its increasingly up-armored
police forces, but the world of thought,
the insides of our minds. Think of the
17 intertwined intelligence outfits in
“the U.S. Intelligence Community” and their
ongoing “surge” for information dominance
across every mode of human communication, as
well as the surveillance of everything. And
don’t forget the national security state’s
leading role in making
cyberwar a reality. (Indeed, Washington
launched the first cyberwar in history by
deploying the
Stuxnet computer worm against Iran.)
Think of all this as a
global matrix that rests on war, empowering
disaster capitalism and the corporate
complexes that have formed around the
Pentagon, the Department of Homeland
Security, and that intelligence community. A
militarized matrix doesn’t blink at $1.45
trillion dollars devoted to
the F-35, a single under-performing jet
fighter, nor at projections of
$355 billion over the next decade for
“modernizing” the U.S. nuclear arsenal,
weapons that Barack Obama
vowed to abolish in 2009.
7. The new
"normal" in America is war:
The 9/11 attacks happened more than 13 years
ago, which means that no teenagers in
America can truly remember a time when the
country was at peace. "War time" is their
normal; peace, a fairy tale.
What’s truly “exceptional”
in twenty-first-century America is any
articulated vision of what a land at peace
with itself and other nations might be
like. Instead, war, backed by a diet of
fear, is the backdrop against which the
young have grown to adulthood. It’s the
background noise of their world, so much a
part of their lives that they hardly
recognize it for what it is. And that’s the
most insidious danger of them all.
How do we inoculate our
children against such a permanent state of
war and the war state itself? I have one
simple suggestion: just stop it. All of
it. Stop making war a never-ending part of
our lives and stop celebrating it, too. War
should be the realm of the extreme, of the
abnormal. It should be the death of
normalcy, not the dreary norm.
It’s never too soon,
America, to enlist in that good fight!
William J. Astore, a
retired lieutenant colonel (USAF), is a
TomDispatch regular. His
D.Phil. is in Modern History from the
University of Oxford. He’s just plain tired
of war and would like to see the next
politician braying for it be deployed with a
rifle to the front lines of battle. He edits
the blog
The Contrary Perspective.
Follow TomDispatch
on Twitter and join us on
Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch
Book, Rebecca Solnit's
Men Explain Things to Me, and Tom
Engelhardt's latest book,
Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret
Wars, and a Global Security State in a
Single-Superpower World.
Copyright 2015 William J.
Astore