Russia In The Cross Hairs
By Paul Craig Roberts
January 27, 2015 "ICH"
- Washington’s attack on
Russia has moved beyond the boundary of the
absurd into the realm of insanity.
The New Chief of the US
Broadcasting Board of Governors, Andrew
Lack, has declared the Russian news service,
RT, which broadcasts in multiple languages,
to be a terrorist organization equivalent to
Boko Haram and the Islamic State, and
Standard and Poor’s just downgraded Russia’s
credit rating to junk status.
Today RT International
interviewed me about these insane
developments.
In prior days when America
was still a sane country, Lack’s charge
would have led to him being laughed out of
office. He would have had to resign and
disappear from public life. Today in the
make-believe world that Western propaganda
has created, Lack’s statement is taken
seriously. Yet another terrorist threat has
been identified–RT. (Although both Boko
Haram and the Islamic State employ terror,
strictly speaking they are political
organizations seeking to rule, not terror
organizations, but this distinction would be
over Lack’s head. Yes, I know. There is a
good joke that could be made here about what
Lack lacks. Appropriately named and all
that.)
Nevertheless, whatever
Lack might lack, I doubt he believes his
nonsensical statement that RT is a terrorist
organization. So what is his game?
The answer is that the
Western presstitute media by becoming
Ministries of Propaganda for Washington,
have created large markets for RT, Press TV,
and Al Jazeera. As more and more of the
peoples of the world turn to these more
honest news sources, Washington’s ability to
fabricate self-serving explanations has
declined.
RT in particular has a
large Western audience. The contrast between
RT’s truthful reporting and the lies spewed
by US media is undermining Washington’s
control of the explanation. This is no
longer acceptable.
Lark has sent a message to
RT. The message is: pull in your horns; stop
reporting differently from our line; stop
contesting the facts as Washington states
them and the presstitutes report them; get
on board or else.
In other words, the “free
speech” that Washington and its EU,
Canadian, and Australian puppet states tout
means: free speech for Washington’s
propaganda and lies, but not for any truth.
Truth is terrorism, because truth is the
major threat to Washington.
Washington would prefer to
avoid the embarrassment of actually shutting
down RT as its UK vassal did to Press TV.
Washington simply wants to shut up RT.
Lark’s message to RT is: self-censure.
In my opinion, RT already
understates in its coverage and reporting as
does Al Jazeera. Both news organizations
understand that they cannot be too
forthright, at least not too often or on too
many occasions.
I have often wondered why
the Russian government allows 20 percent of
the Russian media to function as
Washington’s fifth column inside Russia. I
suspect the reason is that by tolerating
Washington’s blatant propaganda inside
Russia, the Russian government hopes that
some factual news can be reported in the US
via RT and other Russian news organizations.
These hopes, like other
Russian hopes about the West, are likely to
be disappointed in the end. If RT is closed
down or assimilated into the Western
presstitute media, nothing will be said
about it, but if the Russian government
closes down Washington’s agents, blatant
liars all, in the Russian media, we will
hear forever about the evil Russians
suppressing “free speech.” Remember, the
only allowable “free speech” is Washington’s
propaganda.
Only time will tell
whether RT decides to be closed down for
telling the truth or whether it adds its
voice to Washington’s propaganda.
The other item in the
interview was the downgrading of Russian
credit to junk status.
Standard and Poor’s
downgrade is, without any doubt, a political
act. It proves what we already know, and
that is that the American rating firms are
corrupt political operations. Remember the
Investment Grade rating the American rating
agencies gave to obvious subprime junk?
These rating agencies are paid by Wall
Street, and like Wall Street they serve the
US government.
A look at the facts serves
to establish the political nature of the
ruling. Don’t expect the corrupt US
financial press to look at the facts. But
right now, we will look at the facts.
Indeed, we will put the
facts in context with the US debt situation.
According to the debt
clocks available online, the Russian
national debt as a percentage of Russian GDP
is 11 percent. The American national debt as
a percentage of US GDP is 105 percent, about
ten times higher. My coauthors, Dave
Kranzler, John Williams, and I have shown
that when measured correctly, the US debt as
a percent of GDP is much higher than the
official figure.
The Russian national debt
per capita is $1,645. The US national debt
per capita is
$56,952.
The size of Russia’s
national debt is $235 billion, less than one
quarter of a trillion. The size of the US
national debt is $18 trillion, 76.6
times larger than the Russian debt.
Putting this in
perspective: according to the debt clocks,
US GDP is $17.3 trillion and Russian GDP is
$2.1 trillion. So, US GDP is 8 times greater
than Russian GDP, but US national debt is
76.6 times greater than Russia’s debt.
Clearly, it is the US
credit rating that should have been
downgraded to junk status. But this cannot
happen. Any US credit rating agency that
told the truth would be closed and
prosecuted. It wouldn’t matter what the
absurd charges are. The rating agencies
would be guilty of being anti-american,
terrorist organizations like RT, etc. and so
on, and they know it. Never expect any truth
from any Wall Street denizen. They lie for a
living.
According to this site:
http://people.howstuffworks.com/5-united-states-debt-holders.htm#page=4
the US owes Russia as of January 2013 $162.9
billion. As the Russian national debt is
$235 billion, 69 percent of the Russian
national debt is covered by US debt
obligations to Russia.
If this is a Russian
Crisis, I am Alexander the Great.
As Russia has enough US
dollar holdings to redeem its entire
national debt and have a couple hundred
billion dollars left, what is Russia’s
problem?
One of Russia’s problems
is its central bank. For the most part,
Russian economists are the same neoliberal
incompetents that exist in the Western
world. The Russian economists are enamored
of their contacts with the “superior” West
and with the prestige that they image these
contacts give them. As long as the Russian
economists agree with the Western ones, they
get invited to conferences abroad. These
Russian economists are de facto American
agents whether they realize it or not.
Currently, the Russian
central bank is squandering the large
Russian holdings of foreign reserves in
support of the Western attack on the ruble.
This is a fools’ game that no central bank
should play. The Russian central bank should
remember, or learn if it does not know,
Soros’ attack on the Bank of England.
Russian foreign reserves
should be used to retire the outstanding
national debt, thus making Russia the only
country in the world without a national
debt. The remaining dollars should be dumped
in coordinated actions with China to destroy
the dollar, the power basis of American
Imperialism.
Alternatively, the Russian
government should announce that its reply to
the economic warfare being conducted against
Russia by the government in Washington and
Wall Street rating agencies is default on
its loans to Western creditors. Russia has
nothing to lose as Russia is already cut off
from Western credit by US sanctions. Russian
default would cause consternation and crisis
in the European banking system, which is
exactly what Russia wants in order to break
up Europe’s support of US sanctions.
In my opinion, the
neoliberal economists who control Russian
economic policy are a much greater threat to
the sovereignty of Russia than economic
sanctions and US missile bases. To survive
Washington, Russia desperately needs people
who are not romantic about the West.
To dramatize the
situation, if President Putin will grant me
Russian citizenship and allow me to appoint
Michael Hudson and Nomi Prins as my
deputies, I will take over the operation of
the Russian central bank and put the West
out of operation.
But that would require
Russia taking risks associated with victory.
The Atlanticist Integrationists inside the
Russian government want victory for the
West, not for Russia. A country imbued with
treason inside the government itself has
reduced chance against Washington, a
determined player.
Another fifth column
operating against Russia from within are the
US and German funded NGOs. These American
agents masquerade as “human rights
organizations,” as “women’s rights
organizations,” as “democracy
organizations,” and whatever other cant
titles that serve in a politically correct
age and are unchallengeable.
Yet another threat to
Russia comes from the percentage of the
Russian youth who lust for the depraved
culture of the West. Sexual license,
pornography, drugs, self-absorption. These
are the West’s cultural offerings. And, of
course, killing Muslims.
If Russians want to kill
people for the fun of it and to solidify US
hegemony over themselves and the world, they
should support “Atlanticist integration” and
turn their backs on Russian nationalism. Why
be Russian if you can be American serfs?
What better result for the
American neoconservatives than to have
Russia support Washington’s hegemony over
the world? That is what the neoliberal
Russian economists and the “European
Integrationists” support. These Russians are
willing to be American serfs in order to be
part of the West and to be paid well for
their treason.
As I was interviewed about
these developments by RT, the news anchor
kept trying to confront Washington’s charges
with the facts. It is astonishing that the
Russian journalists do not understand that
facts have nothing to do with it. The
Russian journalists, those independent of
American bribes, think that facts matter in
the disputes about Russian actions. They
think that the assaults on civilians by the
American supported Ukrainian Nazis is a
fact. But, of course no such fact exists in
the Western media. In the Western media the
Russians, and only the Russians, are
responsible for violence in Ukraine.
Washington’s story line is
that it is the evil Putin’s intent on
restoring the Soviet Empire that is the
cause of the conflict. This media line in
the West has no relationship to any facts.
In my opinion, Russia is
in grave danger. Russians are relying on
facts, and Washington is relying on
propaganda. For Washington, facts are not
relevant. Russian voices are small compared
to Western voices.
The lack of a Russian
voice is due to Russia itself. Russia
accepted living in a world controlled by US
financial, legal, and telecommunication
services. Living in this world means that
the only voice is Washington’s.
Why Russia agreed to this
strategic disadvantage is a mystery. But as
a result of this strategic mistake, Russia
is at a disadvantage.
Considering the inroads
that Washington has into the Russian
government itself, the economically powerful
oligarchs and state employees with Western
connections, as well as into the Russian
media and Russian youth, with the hundreds
of American and German financed NGOs that
can put Russians into the streets to protest
any defense of Russia, Russia’s future as a
sovereign country is in doubt.
The American
neoconservatives are relentless. Their
Russian opponent is weakened by the success
inside Russia of Western cold war propaganda
that portrays the US as the savior and
future of mankind.
The darkness from Sauron
America continues to spread over the world.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for
Economic Policy and associate editor of the
Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for
Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service,
and Creators Syndicate. He has had many
university appointments. His internet
columns have attracted a worldwide
following. Roberts' latest books are
The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and
Economic Dissolution of the West and
How America Was Lost.