Why Do US Critics Love
American Sniper?
By Jonathan Cook
I watched American Sniper the
other night and it really is the most
puerile propaganda imaginable. It is not
even as though it is simply unfair to the
“enemy” – that is, mostly ordinary Iraqis,
who are shown to be ruthless and heartless
killers filled with irrational hatred for
the American soldiers sent to liberate them
from … well, in this re-write of history it
is seemingly from al-Qaeda. It is equally
unfair to the US soldiers there, presenting
them either as good guys being heroes or as
good guys being traumatised by their
exposure to the natives’ savagery.
And, of course, it also massively distorts
the truth about Chris Kyle – a man who at
best was so blinkered by his own childish
jingoism that, by his own account, he never
entertained a doubt about killing “Arabs”,
even women and children, and at worst was a
psychopath whom the US army gave a licence
to go on a killing spree.
But even if one ignores the movie’s politics
and its absolute failure to grasp documented
facts about the invasion of Iraq and instead
assesses it purely on its technical aspects,
it’s a pedestrian affair at most. The
romantic scenes, for example, are cliched
and poorly written.
In other words, the only reason audiences
could be raving about American Sniper,
ensuring it becomes one of the
biggest-grossing films in history, is that
it closely aligns with the mood of self-pity
that currently dominates in the US: the
sense that those dark-skinned foreigners we
tried to liberate were not only evil but,
worse, ungrateful too.
Matt Tabibi has a good piece in Rolling
Stone that sums up my feelings about the
film. But one thing he doesn’t address is
this: why, if it’s so clearly a mediocre
film that soft-soaps the central character,
ignores or deceives its audience on the
context that brought soldiers like Kyle to
Iraq, and has a plot that ought to embarrass
a Walt Disney production, do 83% of “top
critics” on a review aggregator site like
Rotten Tomatoes give it the thumbs up?
In practice, “top critics” means the 50 or
so film reviewers who work for the most
prestigious US media outlets. So almost all
of the US media’s supposedly finest critical
minds are in agreement in lavishing praise
on this dud. It is apparently
“breath-taking”, “gripping” and “emotionally
complex”. Or it is if the only complexity
that interests you is whether Kyle gets to
save another US soldier from the
dark-skinned bad guys before he succumbs to
post-traumatic stress disorder.
Reading the US reviews of American Sniper is
a good way to remind ourselves not only of
the critical role Hollywood plays in
popularising lies about the West’s recent
history and in sanitising our crimes, but
also of the vital role the mainstream media
play in giving these simplistic and
duplicitous fables an aura of ethical
complexity and intellectual respectability.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/american-sniper-is-almost-too-dumb-to-criticize-20150121
Jonathan Cook is a
Nazareth- based journalist and winner of
the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for
Journalism - See more at: http://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2015-01-26/why-do-critics-love-american-sniper/#sthash.Ue3oQ8xb.dpuf
Jonathan Cook is a
Nazareth- based journalist and winner of the
Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism
-
http://www.jonathan-cook.net/