Who Stands to Benefit From Terrorist
Attacks in France?
By Mikail Khazin
January 21, 2015 "ICH"
-
The scale of the events in France and the
intensity of the ensuing panic turned out to
be so massive that even the most politically
unprepared people realized that the
stability of EU is facing an enormous
threat. And it doesn’t even matter if the
French authorities are successful in
neutralizing the current situation – it may
repeat on a much larger scale. It is
impossible to stop this process within the
framework of the modern “tolerant democracy”
– placing well armed professional security
units in front of every building in every
city is simply not an option and everything
else would be ineffective. An honest
assessment of risks associated with similar
events, even just in terms of insurance
claims, will show that the entire economy is
at risk of going down the drain. And I am
talking about world-wide economy. Since I
have written here a forecast that, among
other things, contains some information
about year 2015, I am obliged to add some
commentary. The first question that begs an
answer is: who stands to profit?
Here I will simply list possible
beneficiaries. First choice – the US. The
authorities in that country realized that
the influence of opposition elites (the ones
I wrote about in my forecast) is increasing
so much that it is not only jeopardizing the
agreements around the Trans Atlantic Free
Trade Area (TAFTA), but also becoming a
threat to the pro-American elites’ hold on
power in Europe. Orban in Hungary, Zeman in
Czech Republic, Marin Le Pen in France… All
of these represent very negative processes
for the US. Therefore, the situation must be
blown up, “democracy” must be tucked away
and a strict dictatorship must be
established. A pro-American dictatorship
that is, which will thoughtlessly follow
orders from Washington without the need to
engage in any kind of “democratic”
procedures. In other words, install
“pinochets” in every EU country complete
with all the “bells and whistles” that
always accompany these types of regimes:
“death squadrons”, rollback of all social
security standards, removal of state
regulations – that is total liberalization.
And, of course, along with these
developments a free trade area with the US
will be established. By the way, the refusal
by French authorities to allow “Front
populaire” to participate in the “unity
march” fits the above scenario very neatly –
what kind of “democracy” and “unity” is this
when a quarter of the native French (!)
population is being rudely shoved aside.
I also would like to note that within the US
elite there are several groups each of them
having their own channels which could be
used to stimulate and organize terrorist
attacks that will fit their agenda. Each
group has their own partners (British
Windsors, world financial elites, China and
many others), as well as their own
interests, and all of this requires a very
detailed and thorough analysis.
Second possibility – Britain (or, to be more
specific, the House of Windsor). They might
be worried about a scenario where Merkel
will completely give in to US pressure and
push Brussels to sign the TAFTA agreement,
which will put an end to the idea of
creating alternative non-dollar currency
zones and will force the British financial
system (“rothschilds”) to lose control over
interzonal transactions. Which basically
means that a more or less independent
British financial system will cease to
exist, just as London will lose its status
as a world financial center.
Third possibility – continental European
elites (“black internationale”, or the
Vatican - in conspirological terms). For
them, TAFTA is a catastrophe, and they have
already gained enough influence to try and
bring nationally oriented opposition elites
to power. Once the number of EU countries
where this handover of power happens passes
a critical threshold, pro-American elites in
Brussels would be forced out and the EU as
we know it will be finished. It is possible
that the ideas of Franco-German-Russian
domination in Europe play a certain role in
this scenario. Within imperial, and not
liberal-democratic framework, of course.
Fourth possibility – Germany. They could
have gotten anxious that Hollande will back
out (of plans previously coordinated with
Merkel) under the threat of losing power and
they created a situation that allows to
“tighten the screws” and substantially limit
the influence and capabilities of the
anti-American group led by Le Pen.
Fifth possibility is the one that is
currently being “fed” to the masses, which
is what makes it the least probable. This
version implies that islamists are behind
the attack - ISIS, “Al Qaeda”, etc. It has
its own intricacies because wherever we see
a mention of “Al Qaeda”, we must also look
for traces of CIA and British intelligence
involvement. “Al Qaeda” does not have enough
power and resources to carry out such an
attack independently, without outside help.
Sixth possibility – Saudi Arabia. Today it
is taking a serious hit and it must find a
way to survive. A number of scenarios which
are being developed by US imply liquidation
of the Saudi state with the ultimate goal of
creating a Sunni caliphate, which would
subsequently be used in an attack on Israel
and Iran. These scenarios must be prevented.
The easiest way is to tie up US resources on
as many fronts as possible, forcing them to
abandon the plans to remove Saudis from
power. Israel is helping Saudis in this
situation, but keeping a low profile.
Seventh possibility – us (Russia). Having
failed to persuade Merkel to drop sanctions
and realizing that she is firmly under US
control, we decided to “blow up” EU. And
started with France as it appears to be the
first major European country ready to leave
the US confrontation scheme against Russia.
This gives Hollande an alibi and support for
his anti-American actions (“What can we do,
- he will tell Obama, - you didn’t help,
while Russia is supporting us”), and so on.
It is also possible that we already have
agreements with some of the parties
mentioned above.
And the eights possibility, as we are moving
further East – is China. This would mean
that the attack was a “blowback” for Ukraine
and other actions directed against the new
Silk Road. In other words, it would imply
China’s entry into the big political “game”
on a world-wide scale.
Theoretically all of the above mentioned
possibilities are still not out of the
question. As time goes by, more and more
information will become available and the
picture will become clearer, but we need to
pay close attention. Many of the mentioned
parties have their own ideological agendas,
which were symbolically presented to the
public during the last two days. The symbols
included candles (for some reason no one in
EU lighted candles to commemorate victims in
Donbass, Odessa or Mariupol even though all
of these places are also located in Europe
and there are more people dying there every
day, than in France), flowers, staged “unity
marches” that reeked of fakeness so badly
that one must wonder why it was impossible
to prepare better!
Here is Russia things are starting to move
as well – just look at the bickering between
Venediktov and Kadyrov! However, I still
don’t see any constructive course of action
being undertaken, but it is possible that it
will never happen – because there is no one
to implement such a course of action. By the
way, I found Khodorkovsky’s statement very
indicative of what is happening here right
now. He was clearly used to provoke the
public and this distinctly showed that he is
not an independent political figure.
Furthermore, those who are using him are
obviously no longer considering him a
valuable asset. Translation by: Mikhael -
Via
http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.co.uk/
|
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note-
Translation may take a
moment to load.
What's your response?
-
Scroll down to add / read comments
|
|
Support Information Clearing House
|
|
|
Please
read our
Comment Policy
before posting -
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
|
| |
|
