The leadership in the US knows full well that their days as the world's largest oil producer are numbered in days or months, not years.
By Dmitry Orlov
January 20, 2015 "ICH"
- Over the course of 2014 the
prices the world pays for crude oil
have tumbled from over $125 per
barrel to around $45 per barrel now,
and could easily drop further before
heading much higher before
collapsing again before spiking
again. You get the idea. In the end,
the wild whipsawing of the oil
market, and the even wilder
whipsawing of financial markets,
currencies and the rolling
bankruptcies of energy companies,
then the entities that financed
them, then national defaults of the
countries that backed these
entities, will in due course cause
industrial economies to collapse.
And without a functioning industrial
economy crude oil would be
reclassified as toxic waste. But
that is still two or three decades
off in the future.
In the meantime, the much lower
prices of oil have priced most of
the producers of unconventional oil
out of the market. Recall that
conventional oil (the
cheap-to-produce kind that comes
gushing out of vertical wells
drilled not too deep down into dry
ground) peaked in 2005 and has been
declining ever since. The production
of unconventional oil, including
offshore drilling, tar sands,
hydrofracturing to produce shale oil
and other expensive techniques, was
lavishly financed in order to make
up for the shortfall. But at the
moment most unconventional oil costs
more to produce than it can be sold
for. This means that entire
countries, including Venezuela's
heavy oil (which requires upgrading
before it will flow), offshore
production in the Gulf of Mexico
(Mexico and US), Norway and Nigeria,
Canadian tar sands and, of course,
shale oil in the US. All of these
producers are now burning money as
well as much of the oil they
produce, and if the low oil prices
persist, will be forced to shut
down.
An additional problem is the very
high depletion rate of “fracked”
shale oil wells in the US.
Currently, the shale oil producers
are pumping flat out and setting new
production records, but the drilling
rate is collapsing fast. Shale oil
wells deplete very fast: flow rates
go down by half in just a few
months, and are negligible after a
couple of years. Production can only
be maintained through relentless
drilling, and that relentless
drilling has now stopped. Thus, we
have just a few months of glut left.
After that, the whole shale oil
revolution, which some bobbleheads
thought would refashion the US into
a new Saudi Arabia, will be over. It
won't help that most of the shale
oil producers, who speculated wildly
on drilling leases, will be going
bankrupt, along with exploration and
production companies and oil field
service companies. The entire
economy that popped up in recent
years around the shale oil patch in
the US, which was responsible for
most of the growth in high-paying
jobs, will collapse, causing the
unemployment rate to spike.
It bears pointing out that the
excess inventory of oil that has
precipitated this price collapse is
not particularly large. It all
started with a concerted effort by
Saudi Arabia and the US to dump oil
on the international market, to
drive down the price. The leadership
in the US knows full well that their
days as the world's largest oil
producer are numbered in days or
months, not years. They realize what
a major economic hangover will
result from the collapse of shale
oil production. The Canadians,
realizing that their tar sands
adventure is likewise nearing its
end, want to play along.
The game they are playing is
basically a game of chicken. If
everybody pumps all the oil they can
regardless of the price, then at
some point one of two things will
happen: shale oil production will
collapse, or other producers will
run out of money, and their
production will collapse. The
question is, Which one of these will
happen first? The US is betting that
the low oil prices will destroy the
governments of the three major oil
producers that are not under their
political and/or military control.
These are Venezuela, Iran and, of
course, Russia. These are long
shots, but, having no other cards to
play, the US is desperate. Is
Venezuela enough of a prize?
Previous attempts at regime change
in Venezuela failed; why would this
one succeed? Iran has learned to
survive in spite of western
sanctions, and maintains trade links
with China, Russia and quite a few
other countries to work around them.
In the case of Russia, it is as yet
unclear what fruit, if any, western
policies against it will bear. For
example, if Greece decides to opt
out of the European Union in order
to get around Russia's retaliatory
sanctions against the EU, then it
will become entirely unclear who has
actually sanctioned whom.
Of course, toppling the governments
of all three of these petro-states,
destroying them economically,
“privatizing” their oil resources
and pumping them dry free of charge
using foreign labor would be just
the shot in the arm the US needs.
But, if you've been following along,
it appears that the US doesn't
always get what it wants, and of
late hardly at all. Which recent US
foreign policy gambit has actually
paid off the way it was supposed to?
Hmm...
And so, for now, all the oil
producers are continuing to pump
flat out. Some producers have the
financial cushion to produce at a
loss, and will do so to protect
their market share. Other producers
have already sunk the money into
drilling the wells and have paid
back enough of the loans while the
oil price was high to continue
producing profitably even at the
lower price. Lastly, a number of
producers (with Russia in the lead)
can make a small profit even at
$25-30 per barrel (if it weren't for
taxes and tariffs).
Each producer has a slightly
different reason to continue pumping
flat out. A lot has been said about
the US and Saudi Arabia colluding to
drive down the price of oil. But the
collusion theory can be sliced away
with Occam's Razor, since they would
be expected to behave exactly the
same even without colluding.
The US is making a desperate attempt
to knock over a petro-state or two
or three before its shale oil runs
out, with the Canadians, their tar
sands now unprofitable, hitching a
ride on its coat-tails, because if
this attempt doesn't work, then it's
lights out for the empire. But none
of their recent gambits have worked.
This is the winter of imperial
discontent, and the empire is has
been reduced to pulling pathetic
little stunts that would be quite
funny if they weren't also sinister
and sad. Take, for instance, the
words spoken by the US State
Department's remote-controlled
Ukrainian prime minister Yatsenyuk
in Berlin recently: it turns out
that the USSR invaded Nazi Germany,
not the other way around! We are
coming up on the 70th anniversary of
the Soviet victory over Nazi
Germany; and so there is no better
time to do—what exactly? The
Russians are confused. But the
Germans took this howler on board
and stayed mum, so score one for the
empire!
Or take the Charlie Hebdo psy-ops in
Paris, which, for anyone paying
attention, was eerily reminiscent of
the Boston Marathon bombing almost
two years ago. Boston still hasn't
got rid of all of the idiotic
“Boston strong” stickers (no, Boston
was not destroyed by a few
firecrackers and a few amputee
actors bursting bags of fake blood
to pretend that they just had a leg
blown off). And now Paris is
festooned with eerily similar "I am
Charlie" stickers. Killing a handful
of innocents is, of course, standard
procedure: few real atrocities help
render the “conspiracy theory”
version of the events unthinkable
for anyone under imperial mind
control because, you see “They are
the good guys” and “good guys” don't
do such things. But that mind
control is slipping away, and even
some national leaders—such as
Turkey's Erdogan—publicly declared
that the event had been staged. Also
similarly, the supposed perpetrators
were summarily executed by the
police before anyone could find out
anything about them. It's become
quite clear by now that such events
are being cooked up by the same
bunch of not-terribly-creative
hacks. They seem to be recycling the
PowerPoints: delete Boston; insert
Paris. But the French have defended
their right to insult Moslems (and
Christians) with impunity (but these
rights are sure to be taken away
when nobody is looking)—but not the
inexplicably important Jews or gays,
mind you, because that will get you
a prison term. Score another one for
the empire!
Or take the shoot-down of Malaysia's
flight MH17 over Eastern Ukraine
earlier this year. The western
public officials and press
instantaneously blamed
"Putin-supported rebels" with the
shoot-down. When the results of the
ensuing investigation lead to a
different conclusion, they were made
secret. But now the Russians have a
Ukrainian defector in witness
protection who has identified the
Ukrainian pilot who shot down the
airliner, using an air-to-air
missile fired from a fighter jet.
Since the rebels have no air force,
an air-to-air missile was an unusual
bit of ordnance for the Ukrainians,
and was clearly loaded up just for
this occasion. So we know who, how,
and why; the only remaining question
is, for whom; bets are, the hit was
ordered from Washington. This was
big news in Russia, but western
media has self-censored the story
out of existence and, whenever the
topic is mentioned, continues to
repeat the "Putin did it" mantra,
so... score another one for empire!
But a bunch of deluded people
muttering to themselves in a dark
corner, while the rest of the world
points at them and laughs, does not
an empire make. With this level of
performance, I would venture to
guess that nothing the empire tries
from here on will work to its
satisfaction.
Saudi Arabia is generally displeased
with the US, because the US has been
failing at its job of policing the
neighborhood and generally keeping a
lid on things. Afghanistan is
reverting to Talebanistan, Iraq has
ceded territory to ISIS and now only
controls the territory of the bronze
age kingdoms of Akkad and Sumer,
Libya is in a state of civil war,
Egypt has been “democratized” into a
military dictatorship, Turkey (a
NATO member and a EU candidate
member) is now trading primarily
with Russia, the mission to topple
Syria's Assad is in shambles, the US
“partners” in Yemen have just been
overthrown by Shiite militiamen, and
now there is ISIS, initially
organized and trained by the US,
threatening to destroy the House of
Saud. Add to that that the US-Saudi
joint venture to destabilize Russia
by formenting terrorism in Northern
Caucasus has completely failed. It
couldn't organize even a single
terrorist action to disrupt the
Sochi Olympics. (Saudi Arabia's
Prince Bandar bin Sultan lost his
job over that fiasco.) And so the
Saudis are pumping flat out not so
much to help the US as for other,
more obvious reasons: to drive out
high-priced producers (US included)
and to maintain their market share.
They are also sitting on a stockpile
of US dollars, which they want to
put to good use while they are still
worth something.
Russia is pumping the usual amount
because there is really no reason to
stop and plenty of reasons to
continue. Russia is a low-price
producer, and can wait out the US.
It is also sitting on a large
stockpile of dollars, which might as
well get used up while they are
still worth something. Russia's
greatest asset is not its oil but
the patience of its people: they
understand that they will go through
a difficult patch as they scramble
to replace imports (from the west
especially) with domestic production
and other sources. They can afford
to take a loss; they will make it
all back once the price of oil
recovers.
Because it will recover. The fix for
low oil prices is... low oil prices.
Past some point high-priced
producers will naturally stop
producing, the excess inventory will
get burned up, and the price will
recover. Not only will it recover,
but it will probably spike, because
a country littered with the corpses
of bankrupt oil companies is not one
that is likely to jump right back
into producing lots of oil while, on
the other hand, beyond a few uses of
fossil fuels that are discretionary,
demand is quite inelastic. And an
oil price spike will cause another
round of demand destruction, because
the consumers, devastated by the
bankruptcies and the job losses from
the collapse of the oil patch, will
soon be bankrupted by the higher
price. And that will cause the price
of oil to collapse again.
And so on until the last
industrialist dies. His cause of
death will be listed as “whiplash”:
the “shaken industrialist syndrome,”
if you will. Oil prices too high/low
in rapid alternation will have
caused his neck to snap. Some
artisans will collect a bit of oil
from some slowly oozing old wells,
refine it using clay pots heated
with wood, and use it to power an
antique hearse that will take the
planet's last industrialist to the
industrialist boneyard.