Crime and CIA
Embarrassments
Exclusive: Ex-CIA official Jeffrey Sterling
is going on trial for espionage because he
allegedly told a reporter about a botched
covert op that sent flawed nuclear designs
to Iran, but powerful people want to spare
ex-CIA Director David Petraeus indictment
for leaking secrets to a mistress.
By Ray McGovern
Gen. David Petraeus in a photo with
his biographer/mistress Paula Broadwell.
(U.S. government photo)
I confess to being naïve.
From what I had read about “Operation
Merlin,” a harebrained scheme to sabotage
Iran’s nuclear program, I was convinced that
the CIA would be determined to avoid calling
more attention to it. Or, by extension, to
author James Risen’s continuing revelations
– in his new book Pay Any Price” – of
unconscionable incompetence by our intrepid
spies. “Merlin” was exposed in an earlier
Risen book, State of War.
How wrong I was! The decision by the CIA and
hired hands at the Justice Department to
prosecute former CIA official Jeffrey
Sterling reflects, rather, a clear
determination to give priority to deterring
potential whistleblowers privy to
information extremely embarrassing to the
government. I repeat, embarrassing to the
government, not detrimental to the national
security.
As for risk of extreme embarrassment once
U.S. citizens got additional insight into
the dumb schemes of amateur intelligence
operators, the government presumably thinks
it can depend on mainstream media to treat
bungling by our sophomore spies “with
discretion.”
In short, the prosecution of Jeffrey
Sterling seems to have little to do with
exposing secrets, but everything to do with
hiding the kind of gross misfeasance that –
truth be told – does constitute a real and
present danger to our national security.
Similarly, one might think the government
would be embarrassed when it became more
widely known that Jeffrey Sterling did go to
Senate Intelligence Committee staffers to
tell them of this unconscionably stupid
covert action (which involved delivering
flawed nuclear weapons blueprints to Iran in
2000 with the goal of sabotaging any
bomb-building plans, but the flaws were
apparently detected and the real data
inadvertently exposed genuine
nuclear-weapons secrets).
Sterling’s efforts to go through channels
had zero results. One need not be a cynic to
conclude that the government apparently sees
an overweening, countervailing positive in
demonstrating to potential whistleblowers
(if further evidence were needed) that going
to congressional “overseers” is a feckless
exercise and only serves to get you in a
peck of trouble. When Risen included a
section about Operation Merlin in State of
War, Sterling became the chief suspect and
now faces 10 felony counts, including seven
under the Espionage Act.
In this light, is there not supreme irony in
former Senate Intelligence Committee chair
Diane Feinstein’s plea that former CIA
Director David Petraeus not be prosecuted
for sharing classified information with his
biographer/mistress because he has “suffered
enough?” Does one have to be an intelligence
officer to appreciate the gravity of that
crime, especially since Petraeus served as
the agency’s top official? Do the big shots
with lots of important friends get one
standard of justice and the lower ranks get
another?
Apparently, there are some old-timers at the
FBI and Justice who deem Petraeus’s alleged
indiscretions with classified material
eminently worthy to pursue. And they
presumably know the sensitivity of what
Petraeus shared.
There is sad precedent here. After former
CIA Director John Deutch stepped down in
December 1996, CIA security discovered that
several of his “unclassified” laptop
computers – at his home – contained highly
classified intelligence information,
spurring a formal security investigation.
Deutch got a pardon from President Bill
Clinton on his last day in office.
With the arrogant Deutch it was
above-the-law hubris, pure and simple; there
was no sign of any effort to curry the
favors of a paramour-cum-biographer. Sadly
for Petraeus, L’Affaire Paula Broadwell
seems to be over. Perhaps that is part of
what Sen. Feinstein has in mind in
suggesting he has already “suffered enough”?
And he went through all that embarrassment!
Poor boy!
A cruelly different standard applies to
Jeffrey Sterling, who is alleged to have let
the American people in on the secret of a
reckless covert action.
Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a
publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of
the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was
a CIA analyst for 27 years, and now serves
on the Steering Group of Veteran
Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
(VIPS).