I am NOT Charlie
By The Saker
January 08, 2015 "ICH"
- Okay, let's be clear. I am
not Muslim. I oppose terrorism. I don't
even support the death penalty. I loathe
Takfirism. I oppose violence as a means to
make a political or ethical point. I fully
support freedom of speech, including
critical speech and humor.
But this morning I am most definitely NOT
Charlie.
In fact, I am disgusted and nauseated by the
sick display of collective hypocrisy about
the murders in France. Here is why:
Charlie Hebdo for
the Darwin Awards
The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming.
Here is what I wrote about them in September
2012 when they published their famous
caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed:
Worthy of the
Darwin Awards, if you ask me.
Excellent, the “gene pool” of the French
“caviar-Left” badly needs some cleaning".
Today I fully stand by my words.
 |
|
Just a stupid dare? |
Let me ask you this: what
would be the point of, say, taking a nap on
train tracks? You don't have to "agree"
with the train which will run you over, but
it still will, won't it? What about taking
a nap on train tracks specifically to make a
point? To prove that the train is bad? To
dare it? To make fun of it? Would that not
be the height of stupidity? And yet, that
is *exactly* what Charlie Hebdo did. I
would even argue that that his how Charlie
Hebdo made it's money, daring the "Muslim
train" to run them over. You think I am
exaggerating? Check out the caricature
which one of the folks who got murdered
yesterday had just posted. The text reads:
"Still no terrorist attacks in France -
Wait, we have until the end of January to
send you are best wishes". The crazy
person shown in the drawing is packing a
Kalashnikov and wearing an Afghan "Pakol"
- the typical "crazy Muslim" in Charlie
Hebdo's world. Talk about a stupid dare...
"Spitting in
people's souls"
There is an expression in Russian: spitting
in somebody's soul. It fully applies here.
Muslims worldwide have be unambiguously
clear about that. They take blasphemy very,
very seriously, as they do the name of the
Prophet and the Quran. If you want to
really offend a Muslim, ridicule his Prophet
or his Holy Book. That is not a secret at
all. And when Charlie Hebdo published their
caricatures of the Prophet and when they
ridiculed him the a deliberately rude and
provocative manner, they knew what they were
doing: they were very deliberately deeply
offending 1.6 billion Muslims world
wide. Oh, and did I mention that in Islam
blasphemy is a crime punishable by death?
Well, it turns out that of 1.6 billion
Muslims exactly three decided to take
justice in their own hands and kill the very
deliberately blaspheming Frenchmen. You
don't have to be Muslim or to approve of the
death penalty for blasphemy to realize that
this was inevitable and that this has
nothing to do with Islam as a religion.
Offend any group as large as 1.6
billion and sooner or later you will find
1-5 folks willing to use violence to make
you pay for it. This is a statistical
inevitability.
Are some victims
more equal then others?
So 12 deliberately "soul spitting
blasphemers" were murdered and all of France
is in deep mourning. The media worldwide
does such a good job presenting it all as a
planetary disaster that many thousands
people worldwide say "I am Charlie", sob,
light candles and take a "courageous" stance
for freedom of speech.
Crocodile tears if you ask me.
 |
|
The Empire's freedom fighter |
The fact is that the
AngloZionists have carefully and lovingly
nurtured, organized, armed, financed,
trained, equipped and even directed the
Takfiri crazies for decades. From the war
in Afghanistan to Syria today these
murderous psychopaths have been the
foot-soldiers of the AngloZionist Empire for
decades. But, apparently, nobody cares
about their victims in Afghanistan, in
Bosnia, in Chechnia, in Kosovo, in Libya, in
Kurdistan, in Iraq or elsewhere. There
these liver-eating murderers are "freedom
fighters" who get full support. Including
from the very same media which today is in
mourning over Charlie Hebdo. Apparently, in
the western ethos some victims are
more equal then others.
And when is the last time somebody in Europe
shed a single tear over the daily murders of
innocent people in the Donbass whose murder
is paid for and directly directed by the
western regimes?
How stupid do they
think we are?
And then this. Even a drooling idiot knew
that Charlie Hebdo was THE prime target for
that kind of attack. And I promise you that
French cops are not drooling idiots. Yet,
for some reason, they were nowhere to be
seen that day. Only a van with two (or
one?) cop was parked nearby (hardly an
anti-terrorist protection detail) and one
poor cop was shot and then executed with an
AK shot to the head while he was begging for
mercy. Is this the best the French state
can do?
Hardly.
So what is going on here? I will tell you
what - the EU 1%ers are now capitalizing on
these murders to crack down on their own
population. Sarkozy already met Hollande
and they both agreed that
new levels of firmness and vigilance need to
be implemented. Does that not reek of a
French 9/11?
So no, I am most definitely NOT Charlie this
morning and I am disgusted beyond words with
the obscene display of
doubleplusgoodthinking "solidarity" for
a group of "caviar-lefties" who made their
money spitting in the souls of billions of
people and then dared them to do something
about it. And I am under no illusion
whatsoever about the fact that cui bono
clearly indicates that the French regime
either organized it all, or let it happen
or, at the very least, makes maximal
political use of it all.
But most of all, I am disgusted with all
those who play along and studiously avoid
asking the right questions about all this.
I guess they really are "Charlies" all of
them.
I am not.
The Saker blogs at
http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.com
|
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note-
Translation may take a
moment to load.
What's your response?
-
Scroll down to add / read comments
|
|
Support Information Clearing House
|
|
|
Please
read our
Comment Policy
before posting -
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
|
| |
|
