Blowback In Paris
Armed Terrorists Kill 12 People
By Tony Cartalucci
January 07, 2015 "ICH"
- "Land
Destroyer"-
France, as part of a NATO-led coalition, has
been arming, funding, aiding, and otherwise
perpetuating Al Qaeda terrorists for years,
beginning,
on record in Libya with the overthrow of
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and
continuing until today with NATO's arming,
harboring, and backing of Al Qaeda
terrorists including the so-called "Islamic
State" (ISIS)
within and along Syria's borders.
With the recent attack in
Paris likely the work of the very terrorists
France has been arming and backing across
North Africa and the Middle East, the French
government itself stands responsible, guilty
of the continued material support of a
terrorist organization that has now killed
French citizens, including two police
officers, not only on French soil, but
within the French capital itself.
In the New York Times article, "Terror
Attack on Charlie Hebdo Newspaper in Paris
Kills 12," it was reported that:
Masked gunmen with
automatic weapons opened fire in the
offices of a French satirical newspaper
on Wednesday in Paris, the police said,
killing 12 people and then escaping in a
car.
President François
Hollande said the attack on the weekly,
Charlie Hebdo, was “without a doubt” an
act of terrorism and raised the
nationwide terror alert to its highest
status. He said that several terrorist
attacks had been thwarted in recent
weeks.
However, despite
Hollande's feigned concern and outrage over
the attack, it was the French government who
had advocated and presided over the arming
of terrorist groups across the Arab World in
the West's bid to overthrow nation after
nation and reorder the entire region
according to their own geopolitical and
economic interests starting with the "Arab
Spring" in 2011.
The Washington Post would report in 2011 in
an article titled, "France
sent arms to Libyan rebels," that:
 |
Image:
British-French leaders tour
decimated Libya in wake of 2011
NATO
intervention on behalf of "rebels"
composed primarily of Al Qaeda
terrorists. |
French officials
announced Wednesday that they had armed
rebels in Libya, marking the first time
a NATO country has said it was providing
direct military aid to opponents of the
government in a conflict that has lasted
longer than many policymakers expected.
While Hollande's predecessor,
former French President Nicolas Sarkozy
would be the one to set foot in decimated
Libya in the wake of NATO's intervention
there - which included in addition to French
arms sent to terrorists, French planes
providing these terrorists air cover as they
carried out atrocities and genocide -
Hollande would continue policies enacted
under Sarkozy, both in Libya, and currently
in Syria.
Attack Was Carried Out By Professional "Gladio-Style" Operators
Video that has emerged from the recent
attack in Paris shows heavily armed
militants expertly handling their
military-grade weapons with precision and
discipline - clearly the recipients of
military training. Whichever flavor of "Al
Qaeda" they hail from, they are a product of
the global network of terrorism the West has
purposefully created and perpetuates to this
day in order to carry out a war of terror
upon their own citizenry, as well
as proxy wars against their enemies overseas.
French complicity in arming militants in
Syria especially, has long been a point of
contention and fear among critics who have
for years warned about "blowback." However,
it is unlikely that France, or its partners
amongst this
vast network of state sponsored global terror,
did not anticipate such "blowback," and were
somehow unable to prevent such attacks if
desired. In other words, what the attacks in
Paris appears to be, is another of
NATO's "Operation Gladio" style attacks
on the European people in an insidious bid
to manipulate public perception as well as
the regional political landscape.
Funded by the US, trained in Britain and
maintained as paramilitary extremist groups
throughout Europe during the Cold War,
NATO's so-called "stay behind networks" were
supposedly created to activate in the wake
of a full-scale Soviet invasion of Western
Europe. Instead, they were used to stage
false-flag attacks, killing and maiming
hundreds of Europeans with their atrocities
blamed on the Soviet Union and their
European sympathizers. The attacks and
assassinations were used by NATO to
manipulate public perception and reverse
gains by political groups operating beyond
NATO's control.
 |
Image:
French President Hollande in Saudi
Arabia - among the most prolific
state-sponsors of global terrorism
on Earth and an irreplaceable
partner in
NATO's bid to reorder the Arab
World. |
Likewise, Al Qaeda and its
various franchises including its most recent
and notorious, ISIS, is being used
simultaneously as a domestic menace and a
foreign expeditionary mercenary force.
Indeed, out of one side of President
Hollande's mouth he would condemn the
attacks in Paris, and out of the other,
continue calling for the arming and backing
of the very networks this attack originated
from in order to continue the campaign of
violence and terror in Syria.
Regardless of whatever investigation yields
whatever conclusion, the fact that NATO has
engineered such attacks in the past against
the very people it claims to exist to
protect, makes NATO and the various
political leaders at the head of its
respective member states prime suspects -
both incapable of conducting an impartial
investigation of the recent attack, and
incapable of preventing another attack,
likely engineered not from enemies beyond
Europe's borders, but exceptionally
dangerous enemies within them.
Land Destroyer.blogspot.com
(CC) 2009-2014
Charlie Hebdo - The Chickens Come Home To
Roost
By Moon Of Alabama
January 07, 2015 "ICH"
- "Moon
Of Alabama"-
Twelve people,
including two police, were killed in France
when unknown gunmen attacked the office of
the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo
today.
Some forty people were
killed in Saana, Yemen, today in a bomb
attack on people who were hoping to enlist
with the police. These forty people and the
many more wounded in the attack will get
much less headlines than those killed in
France.
Videos (1,
2) from the attack in Paris show the
attackers in black clothing and behaving as
if they had at least some military training.
They were armed with automatic weapons and,
according to the police, with a rocket
launcher. At least two attackers are still
on the run. We do not yet know the motive of
the attackers, but I consider the following
more likely than a
false flag attack.
In 2011 the magazine
Charlie Hebdo was one of those that
printed the Mohammed caricatures, a crude
and insulting attempt to smear the prophet
and all Muslim as terrorists. In 2012 the
magazine continued the campaign
depicting the prophet Mohammed as naked,
attention seeking gnome.
Unlike U.S. "liberals"
most of the world does not consider free
speech as an absolute right. Indeed like
screaming "fire" in a filled theater,
insulting the believe of other people is
likely to get you hurt in most parts of the
world. To claim such insults should not
matter is itself an insult in that it
declares one culture, that of absolute free
speech rights, to be superior to other
values. It is indecent.
That the Charlie Hebdo
satire was indecent and insulting does not
justify the murderous attack, but explains
the probable motivation of the attackers. It
is deeply wrong to kill people for their
speech. But it is also wrong to insult
others for no good reasons, be it profit or
"free speech" worship.
The attackers in Paris are
believed to be militants who pretend to be
true Muslims fighting for their believes.
The state of France under its presidents
Sarkozy and Hollande has empowered and
supported such pretenders in their attacks
on the people and governments of Libya and
Syria. In Syria Jihadi fighters of the
Islamic State and Jabhat al-Nusra are using
U.S. supplied anti-tank missiles. A German
air defense regiment is defending their
areas of retreat in Turkey against Syrian
government attacks. While it supports
Jihadis in Syria France is now
deploying an air craft carrier to the
Persian Gulf to attack the Islamic State in
Iraq. The last point could also be the
actual motive of today's attack.
The fundamentalists were
cheered on by "western" politicians when
they attacked civilians in Tripoli and
Aleppo. When they attack in countries which
cater to "western interests" or within
"western" countries these attacks are seen
as hostile and used to justify another lurch
to the extreme right, to war and towards
more totalitarian states.
Unless they push for
saner, less aggressive policies the average
people in the middle, no matter their
believes, are the ones losing in this war.
|
Click for
Spanish,
German,
Dutch,
Danish,
French,
translation- Note-
Translation may take a
moment to load.
What's your response?
-
Scroll down to add / read comments
|
|
Support Information Clearing House
|
|
|
Please
read our
Comment Policy
before posting -
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
|
| |
|
