EU Showdown: Greece Takes
on the Vampire Squid
By Ellen Brown
January 07, 2015 "ICH"
- Greece and the troika (the
International Monetary Fund, the EU, and the
European Central Bank) are in a dangerous
game of chicken. The Greeks have been
threatened with a “Cyprus-Style
prolonged bank holiday” if they
“vote wrong.” But they have been bullied for
too long and are saying “no more.”
A return to the polls was
triggered in December, when the Parliament
rejected Prime Minister Antonis Samaras’
pro-austerity candidate for president. In a
general election, now set for January 25th,
the EU-skeptic, anti-austerity, leftist
Syriza party is likely to prevail. Syriza
captured a 3% lead in the polls following
mass public discontent over the harsh
austerity measures Athens was forced to
accept in return for a €240 billion bailout.
Austerity has plunged the
economy into conditions worse than in the
Great Depression. As
Professor Bill Black observes, the
question is not why the Greek people are
rising up to reject the barbarous measures
but what took them so long.
Ireland was similarly
forced into an EU bailout with painful
austerity measures attached. A series of
letters has recently come to light showing
that
the Irish government was effectively
blackmailed into it, with the threat
that the ECB would otherwise cut off
liquidity funding to Ireland’s banks. The
same sort of threat has been leveled at the
Greeks, but this time they are not taking
the bait.
Squeezed by the Squid
The veiled threat to the
Greek Parliament was in a December memo from
investment bank Goldman Sachs – the same
bank that was earlier
blamed for inducing the Greek crisis.
Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi wrote
colorfully of it:
The first thing you
need to know about Goldman Sachs is that
it’s everywhere. The world’s most
powerful investment bank is a great
vampire squid wrapped around the face of
humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood
funnel into anything that smells like
money. In fact, the history of the
recent financial crisis, which doubles
as a history of the rapid decline and
fall of the suddenly swindled dry
American empire, reads like a Who’s Who
of Goldman Sachs graduates.
Goldman has spawned an
unusual number of EU and US officials with
dictatorial power to promote and protect
big-bank interests. They include US Treasury
Secretary Robert Rubin, who brokered the
repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 and
passage of the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act in 2000; Treasury
Secretary Henry Paulson, who presided over
the 2008 Wall Street bailout; Mario Draghi,
current head of the European Central Bank;
Mario Monti, who led a government of
technocrats as Italian prime minister; and
Bank of England Governor Mark Carney, chair
of the Financial Stability Board that sets
financial regulations for the G20 countries.
Goldman’s role in the
Greek crisis goes back to 2001. The vampire
squid, smelling money in Greece’s debt
problems, jabbed its blood funnel into Greek
fiscal management, sucking out high fees to
hide the extent of Greece’s debt in
complicated derivatives. The squid then
hedged its bets by
shorting Greek debt. Bearish bets on
Greek debt
launched by heavyweight hedge funds in
late 2009 put selling pressure on the euro,
forcing Greece into the bailout and
austerity measures that have since destroyed
its economy.
Before the December 2014
parliamentary vote that brought down the
Greek government, Goldman repeated the power
play that has long held the eurozone in
thrall to an unelected banking elite. In a
note titled “From
GRecovery to GRelapse,” reprinted on
Zerohedge, it warned that “the room for
Greece to meaningfully backtrack from the
reforms that have already been implemented
is very limited.”
Why? Because bank
“liquidity” could be cut in the event of “a
severe clash between Greece and
international lenders.” The central bank
could cut liquidity or not, at its whim; and
without it, the banks would be insolvent.
As the late Murray
Rothbard pointed out, all banks are
technically insolvent. They all lend money
they don’t have. They rely on being able to
borrow from other banks, the money market,
or the central bank as needed to balance
their books. The central bank, which has the
power to print money, is the ultimate
backstop in this sleight of hand and is
therefore in the driver’s seat. If that
source of liquidity dries up, the banks go
down.
The Goldman memo warned:
The Biggest
Risk is an Interruption of the Funding
of Greek Banks by The ECB.
Pressing as the
government refinancing schedule may look
on the surface, it is unlikely to become
a real issue as long as the ECB stands
behind the Greek banking system. . . .
But herein lies the
main risk for Greece. The
economy needs the only lender of last
resort to the banking system to maintain
ample provision of liquidity.
And this is not just because banks may
require resources to help reduce future
refinancing risks for the sovereign. But
also because banks are already
reliant on government issued or
government guaranteed securities to
maintain the current levels of liquidity
constant. . . .
In the event of a
severe Greek government clash with
international lenders,
interruption of liquidity provision to
Greek banks by the ECB could potentially
even lead to a Cyprus-style prolonged
“bank holiday”. And market
fears for potential Euro-exit risks
could rise at that point. [Emphasis
added.]
The condition of the Greek
banks was not the issue. The gun being held
to the banks’ heads was the threat that the
central bank’s critical credit line could be
cut unless financial “reforms” were complied
with. Indeed, any country that resists going
along with the program could find that its
banks have been cut off from that critical
liquidity.
That is actually what
happened in Cyprus in 2013. The banks
declared insolvent had
passed the latest round of ECB stress tests
and were no less salvageable than many other
banks – until the troika demanded an
additional €600 billion to maintain the
central bank’s credit line.
That was the threat
leveled at the Irish government before it
agreed to a bailout with strings attached,
and it was the threat aimed in December at
Greece. Greek Finance Minister Gikas
Hardouvelis stated in an interview:
The key to . . . our
economy’s future in 2015 and later is
held by the European Central Bank. . . .
This key can easily and abruptly be used
to block funding to banks and therefore
strangle the Greek economy in no time at
all.
Europe’s Lehman Moment?
That was the threat, but
as noted on Zerohedge, the ECB’s hands
may be tied in this case:
[S]hould Greece decide
to default it would mean those several
hundred billion Greek bonds currently
held in official accounts would go from
par to worthless overnight, leading to
massive unaccounted for impairments on
Europe’s pristine balance sheets, which
also confirms that Greece once again has
all the negotiating leverage.
Despite that risk, on
January 3rd
Der Spiegel reported that the German
government believes the Eurozone would now
be able to cope with a Greek exit from the
euro. The risk of “contagion” is now limited
because major banks are protected by the new
European Banking Union.
The banks are protected
but the depositors may not be. Under the new
“bail-in” rules imposed by the Financial
Stability Board,
confirmed in the European Banking Union
agreed to last spring, any EU government
bailout must be preceded by the bail-in
(confiscation) of creditor funds, including
depositor funds. As in Cyprus, it could be
the depositors, not the banks, picking up
the tab.
What about deposit
insurance? That was supposed to be the third
pillar of the Banking Union, but a eurozone-wide
insurance scheme was never agreed to. That
means depositors will be left to the
resources of their bankrupt local
government, which are liable to be sparse.
What the bail-in protocol
does guarantee are the derivatives bets of
Goldman and other international megabanks.
In a May 2013 article in Forbes titled “The
Cyprus Bank ‘Bail-In’ Is Another Crony
Bankster Scam,” Nathan Lewis laid the
scheme bare:
At first glance, the
“bail-in” resembles the normal
capitalist process of liabilities
restructuring that should occur when a
bank becomes insolvent. . . .
The difference with
the “bail-in” is that the order of
creditor seniority is changed. In the
end, it amounts to the cronies (other
banks and government) and non-cronies.
The cronies get 100% or more; the
non-cronies, including
non-interest-bearing depositors who
should be super-senior, get a kick in
the guts instead. . . .
In principle,
depositors are the most senior creditors
in a bank. However, that was changed in
the 2005 bankruptcy law, which made
derivatives liabilities most senior. In
other words, derivatives liabilities get
paid before all other creditors —
certainly before non-crony creditors
like depositors. Considering the extreme
levels of derivatives liabilities that
many large banks have, and the
opportunity to stuff any bank with
derivatives liabilities in the last
moment, other creditors could easily
find there is nothing left for them at
all.
Even in the worst of the
Great Depression bank bankruptcies, said
Lewis, creditors eventually recovered nearly
all of their money. He concluded:
When super-senior
depositors have huge losses of 50% or
more, after a “bail-in” restructuring,
you know that a crime was committed.
Goodbye Euro?
Greece can regain its
sovereignty by defaulting on its debt,
abandoning the ECB and the euro, and issuing
its own national currency (the drachma)
through its own central bank. But that would
destabilize the eurozone and might end in
its breakup.
Will the troika take that
risk? 2015 is shaping up to be an
interesting year.
Ellen Brown is an
attorney, founder of the Public
Banking Institute, and author of twelve
books including the best-selling Web
of Debt. Her latest book, The
Public Bank Solution, explores
successful public banking models
historically and globally. Her 200+ blog
articles are at EllenBrown.com.