War Crimes Case Filed in
Germany
By Democracy Now!
December 23, 2014 "ICH"
- "DN"
-
A human rights group in Berlin, Germany, has
filed a criminal complaint against the
architects of the George W. Bush
administration’s torture program. The
European Center for Constitutional and Human
Rights has accused former Bush
administration officials, including CIA
Director George Tenet and Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld, of war crimes, and called
for an immediate investigation by a German
prosecutor.
This is a rush
transcript. Copy may not be in its final
form.
JUAN
GONZÁLEZ: A
human rights group in Berlin, Germany, has
filed a criminal complaint against the
architects of the George W. Bush
administration’s torture program. The
European Center for Constitutional and Human
Rights has accused former Bush
administration officials, including
CIA Director
George Tenet and Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld, of war crimes, and called for an
immediate investigation by a German
prosecutor. The move follows the release of
a Senate report on CIA
torture, which includes the case of a German
citizen, Khalid El-Masri, who was captured
by CIA agents in
2004 due to mistaken identity and tortured
at a secret prison in Afghanistan. So far,
no one involved in the
CIA torture program has been charged
with a crime—except the whistleblower John
Kiriakou, who exposed it.
AMY
GOODMAN:
In a statement earlier this week, Wolfgang
Kaleck, general secretary of the European
Center for Constitutional and Human Rights,
said, "By investigating members of the Bush
administration, Germany can help to ensure
that those responsible for abduction, abuse
and illegal detention do not go unpunished,"
unquote.
Meanwhile, President Obama
is standing by his long-standing refusal to
investigate or prosecute Bush administration
officials for the torture program. In a
statement, he called on the nation not to,
quote, "refight old arguments." As Obama
continues to reject a criminal probe of
Bush-era torture, former Vice President Dick
Cheney has said he would do it all again.
Cheney spoke to NBC’s Meet the Press
Sunday.
DICK
CHENEY:
With respect to trying to define that as
torture, I come back to the proposition
torture was what the al-Qaeda terrorists
did to 3,000 Americans on 9/11. There is
no comparison between that and what we
did with respect to enhanced
interrogation. ... It worked. It worked
now. For 13 years we’ve avoided another
mass casualty attack against the United
States. We did capture bin Laden. We did
capture an awful lot of the senior guys
of al-Qaeda who were responsible for
that attack on 9/11. I’d do it again in
a minute.
JUAN
GONZÁLEZ:
Cheney’s claim that he would approve torture
again highlights a key question: Are top
officials above the law, and will the
impunity of today lead to more abuses in the
future? The question spans a wide chain of
command from Cheney, President Bush and
other White House officials, who kickstarted
the torture program after 9/11; to the
lawyers in the Justice Department, who
drafted the memos providing legal cover; to
the CIA officials,
who implemented the abuses and misled
Congress and the public; and to the military
psychologists, who helped devise the
techniques inflicted on prisoners at U.S.
military prisons and secret black sites
across the globe.
AMY
GOODMAN:
To talk more about this, we’re joined now by
two guests. Michael Ratner is back with us,
president emeritus of the Center for
Constitutional Rights, chair of the European
Center for Constitutional and Human Rights.
CCR has been
working with the European Center to file
criminal complaints against Bush
administration officials complicit in the
use of torture. He’s also the author of
The Trial of Donald Rumsfeld: A Prosecution
by Book.
Martin Garbus is also back with us, one of
the leading attorneys in the U.S. Time
magazine calls him "one of the best trial
lawyers in the country." National Law
Journal has named him one of the
country’s top 10 litigators.
We
welcome you both back to Democracy Now!
Yesterday we were talking to you both about
Cuba; today we’re talking about all the news
that has come out. Martin Garbus, should
President Bush, should George Tenet, should
Donald Rumsfeld, should Dick Cheney be put
on trial for torture?
MARTIN
GARBUS:
They should be. The bad thing about it is
they all have a defense they can rely on:
They have the defense of the lawyers’
opinions that were given to them—the
opinions of Gonzales, Bybee and John Yoo.
And unless you can pierce those decisions,
you have a very tough time. It seems to me a
prosecution that ends badly—and I think it
would end badly in the United States—might
not be one that will be brought. But what
should happen is with respect to those
lawyers. When Jay Bybee was elected to the
court of appeals in 2002—was nominated and
then voted upon by the Senate—and John Yoo
presently teaches at Berkeley university. At
the—
AMY
GOODMAN:
At University of California, Berkeley, law
school.
MARTIN
GARBUS:
California. At the time that Yoo was
appointed to Berkeley, there was a mass
demonstration of students against him. At
the time that Bybee was nominated for the
judgeship by Bush, he was criticized, but
you did not yet have all this information.
What Senator Leahy has said, that if you had
all this information, Jay Bybee never would
have passed. Clearly, if you had all this
information that you have now, John Yoo
wouldn’t be appointed. What should happen is
there should be complaints filed in the bar
associations. They should be suspended and
disbarred. Then, perhaps, if you have a
prosecution, you already have established
the faultiness, the horrific faultiness, of
the legal opinions. So it seems to me, at
least in this country, a condition
precedent, as we lawyers say, before you can
have a prosecution, has to be the
invalidation of the legal opinions.
JUAN
GONZÁLEZ:
And—
MICHAEL
RATNER:
I want to just say, I’m not here to debate
Marty on this. And he’s a defense lawyer.
But I strongly disagree that Bush, Cheney,
et al., would have a defense. This wasn’t
like these memos just appeared independently
from the Justice Department. These memos
were facilitated by the very people—Cheney,
etc.—who we believe should be indicted. This
was part of a conspiracy so they could get
away with torture. But that’s not the
subject here now. I just want to—so, that is
clear to me.
Secondly, whatever we think of those memos,
they’re of uselessness in Europe. Europe
doesn’t accept this, quote, "golden shield"
of a legal defense. Either it’s torture or
it’s not. Either you did it or you didn’t.
And that’s one of the reasons, among others,
why we’re going to Europe and why we went to
Europe to bring these cases through the
European Center.
JUAN
GONZÁLEZ: But
I wanted to ask you about that, because—as
the clip we played of President Obama saying
it’s no use refighting old arguments, but
you are in essence refighting arguments in
Europe that the United States refuses to
deal with.
MICHAEL
RATNER:
But, of course, you know, Cheney just showed
us exactly why you have to—have to prosecute
torture. Because if you don’t prosecute it,
the next guy down the line is going to
torture again. And that’s what Cheney said:
"I would do it again."
And
now, the European case is really
interesting. We did try this in 2004—you
covered it here. We tried it in 2006—you
covered it here. But now, because of the
Senate report, we have a much stronger case
in Germany than we ever had, particularly
with regard to a German citizen, Khalid
El-Masri, who was taken off the streets of
Macedonia, sent to the Salt Pit, which is
known as Cobalt in the Senate report.
AMY
GOODMAN:
Wait, explain, though.
MICHAEL
RATNER:
Yeah, yeah.
AMY
GOODMAN:
Tell us that story. It’s a remarkable story.
He was on a bus?
MICHAEL
RATNER:
He was on a bus to take a vacation in Skopje
in Macedonia, and he gets pulled off by
agents of our government, gets taken off the
bus, gets, you know, sodomized, essentially,
with a drug, and then gets taken from there
to the Salt Pit in Afghanistan, which is a
CIA black site
torture center, known as Cobalt in the
report. He’s there for four months.
Everybody knows by—at some point along, this
is a mistake. There was another guy with a
similar name. It wasn’t this guy. Even after
they’re told that it’s a mistake, they leave
him in there, and they leave him to be
tortured. They finally, at the end of this,
just take him out of there, and they drop
him off somewhere—
AMY
GOODMAN:
Condoleezza Rice was involved with this,
right?
MICHAEL
RATNER:
Condoleezza Rice, and so was this woman—
AMY
GOODMAN:
They held him further because they realized
they had been torturing the wrong man.
MICHAEL
RATNER:
That’s correct. And the European Court of
Human Rights actually weighed in on this
case. And what they did is they held
Macedonia liable for allowing that
kidnapping on their streets, and fined them.
And they found that what happened to him on
the streets of Macedonia was torture. So—
AMY
GOODMAN:
Who else was involved?
JUAN
GONZÁLEZ:
Well, we—I want to go to Khalid El-Masri in
his own words, describing his time inside a
secret CIA prison
in Afghanistan.
KHALID
EL-MASRI:
[translated] I was the only one in this
prison in Kabul who was actually treated
slightly better than the other inmates.
But it was known among the prisoners
that other prisoners were constantly
tortured with blasts of loud music,
exposed to constant onslaughts of loud
music. And they were—for up to five
days, they were just sort of left
hanging from the ceiling, completely
naked in ice-cold conditions. The man
from Tanzania, whom I mentioned before,
had his arm broken in three places. He
had injuries, trauma to the head, and
his teeth had been damaged. They also
locked him up in a suitcase for long
periods of time, foul-smelling suitcase
that made him vomit all the time. Other
people experienced forms of torture
whereby their heads were being pushed
down and held under water.
JUAN
GONZÁLEZ:
That was Khalid El-Masri describing his
torture in a CIA
black site. Michael?
MICHAEL
RATNER:
Well, yes, and they knew he was innocent.
And there’s a woman who was just
identified—who has been identified for a
long time, who works for the
CIA. Her name is
Bikowsky, Alfreda Frances Bikowsky, who
apparently was one of the people who
insisted, even though there was people in
the agency saying that "We’ve got the wrong
guy," who insisted on having him picked up
and taken there. She’s also, apparently, one
of the models for the woman in Zero Dark
Thirty. And Jane Mayer recently wrote
an
article about her; it’s, I think, called
"The Queen of Torture" or something like
that ["The Unidentified Queen of
Torture"]—didn’t identify her by name. But
she is one of the defendants in the lawsuit
in Germany.
And
let me just say, Germany—whatever happened
before, between the NSA
spying on Germany and the fact that their
citizen has now been revealed to have been
kept in a torture place, when it was known
that he was innocent, I’m pretty sure that
Germany is going to take this very
seriously.
And
I just spoke to a person you’ve had on here
before, Scott Horton, who’s the columnist
for Harper’s, as well as an expert
on national security, and Scott tells me
that because of these cases we have filed in
Europe, that over a hundred
CIA agents have
been given advice that they should not leave
the United States. Let me just say, what
we’re going to win here in the end, I can’t
say, but that already to me is a major
victory.
MARTIN
GARBUS:
A major victory would be to prosecute the
lawyers themselves—
AMY
GOODMAN:
Martin Garbus.
MARTIN
GARBUS:
—because otherwise what’s going to happen in
the future is you’re going to have
activities, like Cheney or whomever, you’ll
have people in the CIA
and the NSA
relying on faulty legal opinion. So I think
a strong emphasis in the United States has
to be stop future lawyers from doing the
same thing as was done here.
JUAN
GONZÁLEZ: And
your point is that these memos, they
consciously knew that they were violating
torture statutes.
MARTIN
GARBUS:
They consciously knew. And I think Michael
is right, of course, that they were doing it
under the chain of command—Cheney and the
other people. But I think that’s very
difficult to prove, and I think you should
go after the lawyers immediately now.
AMY
GOODMAN:
And, of course, since that time, John Yoo is
an eminent professor at University of
California, Berkeley, law school, and Bybee—
MARTIN
GARBUS:
Jay Bybee is a respected federal judge.
"Respected."
AMY
GOODMAN:
—was elevated to a judgeship.