British believe Bush is more dangerous than Kim Jong-il
· US allies think Washington threat to world peace
· Only Bin Laden feared more in United Kingdom
By Julian Glover
11/03/06 "The
Guardian" -- - America is now seen as a threat to world peace by its closest
neighbours and allies, according to an international survey of
public opinion published today that reveals just how far the
country's reputation has fallen among former supporters since
the invasion of Iraq.
Carried out as US voters prepare to go to the polls next week in
an election dominated by the war, the research also shows that
British voters see George Bush as a greater danger to world
peace than either the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il, or the
Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Both countries were once
cited by the US president as part of an "axis of evil", but it
is Mr Bush who now alarms voters in countries with traditionally
strong links to the US.
The survey has been carried out by the Guardian in Britain and
leading newspapers in Israel (Haaretz), Canada (La Presse and
Toronto Star) and Mexico (Reforma), using professional local
opinion polling in each country.
It exposes high levels of distrust. In Britain, 69% of those
questioned say they believe US policy has made the world less
safe since 2001, with only 7% thinking action in Iraq and
Afghanistan has increased global security.
The finding is mirrored in America's immediate northern and
southern neighbours, Canada and Mexico, with 62% of Canadians
and 57% of Mexicans saying the world has become more dangerous
because of US policy.
Even in Israel, which has long looked to America to guarantee
national security, support for the US has slipped.
Only one in four Israeli voters say that Mr Bush has made the
world safer, outweighed by the number who think he has added to
the risk of international conflict, 36% to 25%. A further 30%
say that at best he has made no difference.
Voters in three of the four countries surveyed also
overwhelmingly reject the decision to invade Iraq, with only
Israeli voters in favour, 59% to 34% against. Opinion against
the war has hardened strongly since a similar survey before the
US presidential election in 2004.
In Britain 71% of voters now say the invasion was unjustified, a
view shared by 89% of Mexicans and 73% of Canadians. Canada is a
Nato member whose troops are in action in Afghanistan. Neither
do voters think America has helped advance democracy in
developing countries, one of the justifications for deposing
Saddam Hussein. Only 11% of Britons and 28% of Israelis think
that has happened.
As a result, Mr Bush is ranked with some of his bitterest
enemies as a cause of global anxiety. He is outranked by Osama
bin Laden in all four countries, but runs the al-Qaida leader
close in the eyes of UK voters: 87% think the al-Qaida leader is
a great or moderate danger to peace, compared with 75% who think
this of Mr Bush.
The US leader and close ally of Tony Blair is seen in Britain as
a more dangerous man than the president of Iran (62% think he is
a danger), the North Korean leader (69%) and the leader of
Hizbullah, Hassan Nasrallah (65%).
Only 10% of British voters think that Mr Bush poses no danger at
all. Israeli voters remain much more trusting of him, with 23%
thinking he represents a serious danger and 61% thinking he does
not.
Contrary to the usual expectation, older voters in Britain are
slightly more hostile to the Iraq war than younger ones. Voters
under 35 are also more trusting of Mr Bush, with hostility
strongest among people aged 35-65.
· ICM interviewed a random sample of 1,010 adults by telephone
from October 27-30. Interviews were conducted across the country
and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults.
Polling was by phone in Canada (sample 1,007), Israel (1,078)
and Mexico (1,010)
© Guardian News and Media Limited 2006
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.