Bush calls for 'world offensive'
By Maxim Kniazkov in Washington
10/01/06 "News" -- - STUNG by criticism, US President George W.
Bush has called for fighting America's enemies "across the
world" as he stepped up his counter-offensive following charges
that his policies were breeding a new generation of Islamic
terrorists.
The call, delivered in his weekly radio address, was aimed to
counter a rash of accusations that the Bush administration had
seriously mishandled the war in Iraq and created fertile
political ground for Islamic extremism.
The criticism was fuelled by a new National Intelligence
Estimate, portions of which were declassified this past week.
The document argues that the war in Iraq had spawned a new
generation of Islamic radicals determined to strike against the
United States.
Casting another cloud over the administration's policy was a new
book by veteran Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward, State
of Denial, that alleges a number of policy blunders committed in
Iraq, amid bitter feuding by the president and his closest aides
and refusal to acknowledge reality.
The controversy may have further dimmed the public's view of the
war. The latest CNN television poll showed 61 per cent of
Americans now believed the war in Iraq was going either "very
badly'' or "moderately badly",' compared to 38 per cent who
thought it was going "very well'' or "moderately well".
But Mr Bush insisted today that claims that the 2003 US-led
invasion of Iraq was helping foster anti-American terrorism were
tantamount to buying "into the enemy's propaganda".
"The only way to protect our citizens at home is to go on the
offense against the enemy across the world,'' the president
said.
"So we will remain on the offense until the terrorists are
defeated and this fight is won.''
The Republican president, who just two days ago branded
opposition Democrats "the party of cut-and-run", argued an early
withdrawal from Iraq, as suggested by some Democrats, would only
embolden terrorists.
"It would help them find new recruits to carry out even more
destructive attacks on our Nation, and it would give the
terrorists a new sanctuary in the heart of the Middle East, with
huge oil riches to fund their ambitions,'' Mr Bush stressed.
"America must not allow this to happen.''
He said that for al-Qaeda and its allies, a safe haven in Iraq
"would be even more valuable than the one they lost in
Afghanistan".
However, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, in an interview
published today, offered a different rationale for continued US
military presence in Iraq, saying it was needed to counter the
growing influence of neighbouring Iran.
"We just have to fight tooth and nail for the victory of the
Iraqis who do not want Iranian influence in their daily lives,''
she told The Wall Street Journal.
"We've got a chance to resist the Iranian push into the region,
but we better get about it.''
The dissonant messages came against the backdrop of stinging
criticism from top Democrats, who have found in the intelligence
estimate and the Woodward book fresh fodder for attacks on the
administration ahead of the November 7 midterm congressional
elections, in which they hope to win back control of the House
of Representatives and maybe even the Senate.
Democrats have long accused the White House of failing to
foresee an Iraqi insurgency, create a viable international
coalition behind the invasion, and of sending too few soldiers
to do control the restive country.
Now they are also charging the president is in a state of
denial.
"He doesn't want to see the facts. He doesn't want to
acknowledge reality,'' Carl Levin, the top Democrat of the
Senate Armed Services Committee, insisted yesterday.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean called Bush's
political counteroffensive "the product of a desperate White
House with no credibility left with the American people".
Copyright 2006 News Limited.
Click on "comments" below to read or post comments
Comment Guidelines
Be succinct, constructive and relevant to the story. We encourage engaging, diverse and meaningful commentary. Do not include personal information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and emails. Comments falling outside our guidelines – those including personal attacks and profanity – are not permitted.
See our complete Comment Policy and use this link to notify us if you have concerns about a comment. We’ll promptly review and remove any inappropriate postings.