The “Honest Broker’s” Plan for occupying Southern Lebanon
By Mike Whitney
“The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant,
vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually ever talked
about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised quite a
clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a
force for universal good. It is a brilliant, even witty, highly
successful act of hypnosis.” Harold Pinter; Nobel Prize acceptance
speech 12-7-05
“Misery and war are children of the same father.” Eduardo Galeano
07/29/06 "Information
Clearing House" -- -- The Bush administration has played an integral
part in the war on Lebanon. They blocked the “peace initiative”
proposed by the 15-member coalition at the Rome Conference and they
supplied “precision-guided weapons” during the hostilities so Israel
could continue to pulverize Beirut and the cities in the south. They
have been as engaged in the fighting as any combatant in the field
and should not be regarded an “impartial arbiter”.
The United States participation in the conflict precludes it from
participating in any settlement of the dispute. The administration
cannot be trusted as an “honest broker”.
President Bush and Tony Blair have come up with a plan for sending a
UN multinational force into southern Lebanon to provide a
buffer-zone for Israel.
Why?
The UN just withdrew its observers after their compound was
“deliberately” flattened by a well-placed Israeli missile killing 4
of its staff.
What makes Bush and Blair believe that a multinational force would
fare any better?
The real motive behind the initiative is to “militarize” the area
south of the Litani River and “ethnically cleanse” the predominantly
Muslim population. This is how Bush intends to stealthily annex more
Lebanese land and create a new de-facto northern border for Israel.
Hezbollah should reject this offer outright as a violation of its
national sovereignty and an obvious attempt occupy its southern
flank.
If Bush and Blair believe that this is a reasonable offer, then they
should not object to “militarizing” the ’67 borders between Israel
and Palestine. That would force Israel to accept the “unanimous
ruling of the international body” in resolution 242 demanding that
Israel withdraw to the pre-war borders. Hezbollah chief, Hassan
Nasrallah would undoubtedly give greater consideration to the
present plan if the UN demonstrated that it was as willing to
provide the same security guarantees for the Palestinians as it is
for the Israelis.
Let the multinational force protect the Palestinians first; then,
we’ll see.
Israel’s claim that it has the right to unilaterally enforce UN
resolution 1559 (“Disarming” Hezbollah) is a non-starter. UN member
states are forbidden from taking military action that hasn’t been
formally authorized by the Security Council. Israel’s assertion
implies that other nations in the region would be equally free to
enforce any of Israel’s 46 or so violations of UN resolutions
without UNSC approval. That’s just crazy. Israel’s sudden conversion
to international law is nothing more than a public relations stunt
devoid of meaning.
The Final Demise of the UN
The only “silver lining” to Israel’s lethal rampage is that it
signals the death-knell for the enfeebled United Nations. The Bush
administration has torpedoed every effort to reach a peace agreement
and blocked all resolutions criticizing Israeli aggression. This, of
course, is why Israeli-loyalist, John Bolton, was installed as US
Ambassador in the first place; to oversee the destruction of the UN
and pave the way for a wider regional war. So far, he has succeeded
admirably. Working in tandem with Condi Rice, Bolton has delivered a
ferocious “one-two” punch that has KO’d the diplomatic work of EU,
the Arab League and the bumbling foreign ministers from around the
globe. Now, whenever Condi or Bolton speaks, it looks like the
entire world stands behind them lending international credibility to
Israel’s ongoing depredations in Lebanon.
Meanwhile, the feckless Kofi Annan is scampering away as fast as
possible from his bombed-out outpost on the Lebanese border. The
UN’s humiliating retreat is bound to be the final nail in the coffin
for the toothless organization. The UN has done nothing to defend
Lebanon’s civilians just as it did nothing during Israel’s 18-year
reign of terror from 1982 to 2000. While innocent people are being
cut down in their homes and cars and the country’s infrastructure is
being reduced smoldering heaps of twisted iron and rubble; the
so-called “international community” is breezily debating how to
punish Hezbollah.
What a farce. Some one should remind the Secretary General that the
Daisy Cutters, cluster-bombs and napalm descending hourly on Beirut
are not the work of Hezbollah, but their marauding neighbor to the
south.
The UN is powerless to stop the fighting and Kofi Annan is too frail
to call for an emergency meeting of the General Assembly to eject
the US from the Security Council. Thus, the institution continues to
slip further into disrepute lacking the moral authority to be
effective and quickly becoming a “rubber-stamp” for US/Israeli
aggression.
Bush’s delusional vision of a “New Middle East” now extends from
Baghdad to Gaza City, and from Beirut to Kabul; each “failed state”
now bearing the imperial imprimatur; each decimated Muslim homeland
is just an inconsequential part of the grand colonial schema.
This is the war on terror promised to us by western, white elites
who aim to control the world’s last dwindling resources and reshape
the Middle East into a modern-day Israeli Kingdom. (“A Clean Break;
Strategy for Securing the Realm”)
Now that 4 countries are awash in the blood of civilians and
progressively deteriorating into chaos; who will still foolishly
argue that this is not a war on Muslims?
Will the world continue to stand by while Bush and Olmert bulldoze
their way to Damascus and Tehran creating even larger mountains of
carnage? Or will the grumblings in Moscow, Caracas, Beijing, and New
Delhi coalesce into some tangible form of resistance?
So far, the silence from the foreign capitals is deafening.
Are Comments Offensive? Unsuitable? Email us