69 Killed in Separate Outbreaks of Violence
By Juan Cole
03/27/06 "ICH"
-- --
All hell broke loose in Iraq on Sunday, but I'm darned if I can
figure out most of what happened or why. It seems possible
that the US committed two major military blunders that will
worsen its relationship with Iraqi political forces.
So they found 30 decapitated bodies near Buhriz, an old Baath
stronghold in Diyala northeast of Baghdad. Those killed were a
mix of Shiites and Sunnis.
Then a mortar shell landed near the house in Najaf of Muqtada
al-Sadr, the nationalist Shiite cleric whose followers are
already upset with Sunnis over the blowing up of the Askariyah
Shrine in Samarra. There were casualties, but Muqtada wasn't
harmed. Everyone just dodged a bullet along with Muqtada, since
if the mortar had killed him, Iraq would have been thrown into
even greater chaos.
As it is, Muqtada implied that the US was responsible. He called
on his followers, according to al-Hayat, to "exercise
self-restraint and to remain calm, so as to foil the plots of
the Occupation authorities to provoke armed conflict, and rather
to practice political resistance in order to expel the
foreigners from Iraq."
Then the US and Iraqi forces say they raided a terror cell in
Adhamiyah. Adhamiyah is a Sunni district of Baghdad and is still
Baath territory.
But somehow the joint US-Iraqi force ended up north, at the
Shiite Shaab district. They say that they took fire from Mahdi
Army militiamen. But there aren't any such Mahdi Army men in
Adhamiyah. I have a sinking feeling that instead of raiding a
Sunni Arab building in Adhamiyah, they got disoriented and
attacked a Shiite religious center in nearby Shaab instead.
Iraqi television angrily showed twenty unarmed corpses on the
floor of the religious center, denouncing the US for killing
innocent worshippers.
The US military is now saying it did not enter any mosques and
that anyone killed was killed by Iraqi special ops.
The Mustafa Husayniyah, however, is not a mosque and may not
have been distinguishable as a religious edifice to non-Shiites.
Shiites mourn their martyred Imams, the descendants of the
Prophet, in centers called Husayniyahs after the Imam Husayn,
the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad. As for the killing being
done by Iraqi troops, if it was a joint mission, then the US
forces are going to take some of the blame.
At least one of the dead was a member of the Dawa Party, the
party headed by Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari. Official Iraqi
television coverage was also uncharacteristically anti-American.
Since the US has been trying to unseat Jaafari, in concert with
the Kurds and Sunni Arabs, he responded to the attack testily.
The incident has yet again postponed negotiations on the
formation of a new government, since the Iraqi Shiites are
universally extremely angry over it. Member of parliament and
aide ot Prime Minister Jaafari, Jawad al-Maliki, demanded a full
investigation of "this crime," according to al-Hayat.
If the US/Iraq force actually did accidentally hit a Shiite
Husayniyah instead of a Sunni Arab terrorist cell, it was a
horrible mistake.
Then US forces raided a secret prison of the Ministry of the
Interior.
They captured 17 Sudanese inmates. After an investigation,
the US finally acknowledged that the assault had made a misttake.
The 17 Sudanese really were guerrillas or in any case from a
social stratum where jail time is no bar to being successful in
politics.
In other words, the jail raid was based on poor information and
false premises. It is possible that our troops also messed up
Gaza indirectly.
Al-Hayat reports that Hazim al-Araji, a Sadrist leader of nearby
Kadhimiyah, said [Ar.]: "American forces attacked the
Mustafa Husayniyah, which belongs to the Sadr Movement, and
killed approximately 20 persons inside it . . . An American
force surrounded the Mustafa Husayniyah in the Ur district and
opened fire on more than 20 persons, killing them."
Jalal Talabani, president of Iraq, and other high politicians
have succeeded in putting on hold direct US-Iran talks on Iraq.
The Iraqi politicians complained about two foreign countries
discussing Iraq with no Iraqi government representative present.
But the problem is that there is no Iraqi government, since the
haggling elected politicians haven't formed one. So, upshot:
US-Iran talks are postponed until after there is a new Iraqi
government.
Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the Iraqi Shiite cleric who heads the
largest bloc in the elected parliament, denied Sunday that
Iran is directly intervening in Iraq. He said that no proof has
ever been presented of these allegations. It doesn't help Condi
Rice to make her case when a close US ally like al-Hakim
directly contradicts her.
Some 20% of Iraqis are living below the poverty line and their
access to food has declined in the past 3 years, according
to the Iraqi government.
Juan Cole is Professor of History at the University of
Michigan - Visit his website
www.juancole.com