|
See Dick Loot
By Dahr Jamail
03/08/06 "t
r u t h o u t" -- -- Halliburton and its
subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR) have been making hay in the
burning Iraqi sun for years now. It is, of course, no coincidence
that the man sitting as vice president played a key role with his
influence in obtaining the lion's share of contracts in Iraq for the
company he was CEO of prior to his self-appointed position. Yet none
of this is news.
What is news, however, is that the ties that bind Cheney to
Halliburton also link him to groups with even broader interests in
the Middle East, which are causing civilians on the ground there, as
well as in the US, to pay the price.
Cheney had much more at stake than pure altruism in making
sure Halliburton/KBR obtained so many no-bid contracts in occupied
Iraq. Despite his claims of not having any
financial ties to Halliburton, the fact is that in both 2001 and
2002 he earned twice as much from a deferred salary from his "old"
company as when he was CEO.
But that wasn't the beginning. When Cheney was US Secretary
of Defense in the early 1990's under Big Bush, Halliburton was
awarded the job of studying, then implementing, the privatization of
routine army functions such as cleaning and cooking meals.
Following this study, when Cheney was finished with his job
at the Pentagon, he scored the job as CEO of Halliburton, which he
held until nominating himself for the position of Little Bush's
running mate in 2000. Remember, it was Cheney who was given the task
of finding a running mate for Bush. After searching far and wide
across the US, Cheney ended up generously offering his own services
for the job.
As if Cheney didn't already have enough conflicts of
interest, it is important to note that he assisted in founding the
neo-conservative think tank, the
"Project for the New American Century (PNAC)," whose goal is to
"promote American global leadership," which entails acquiring Iraqi
oil. Complimenting this, Cheney was also part of the board of
advisers to the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
(JINSA) along with John Bolton, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz
(all PNAC members) before becoming vice president. JINSA,
self-described as a "nonsectarian educational organization," does
things like nominate John Bolton for the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize and
works to "explain the role Israel can ... play in bolstering ... the
link between American defense policy and the security of Israel."
Their Mission Statement adds, "The inherent instability in
the region [Middle East] caused primarily by inter-Arab rivalries
and the secular/religious split in many Muslim societies leaves the
future of the region in doubt. Israel, with its technological
capabilities and shared system of values, has a key role to play as
a US ally in the region," which happens to be quite similar to the
stated goals of the PNAC for the region, but I digress.
By the end of 2002, Cheney owned at least 433,000 unexercised
Halliburton stock options worth over $10 million. And that was
before the invasion of Iraq, when the games really began.
In March 2003, the month the invasion began, Halliburton was
awarded a no-bid contract worth $7 billion from the Pentagon. The
blatant awarding of this "reconstruction" contract to Halliburton
even led Representative Henry Waxman to comment, "The
administration's approach to the reconstruction of Iraq is
fundamentally flawed. It's a boondoggle that's enriching private
contractors."
Of course the invasion and occupation of Iraq aren't only
about oil.
Remember, it was Cheney himself who, at a VFW convention in
August 2002, said "Many of us are convinced that Saddam will acquire
nuclear weapons fairly soon. Just how soon, we cannot really gauge."
Cheney then, solely in the interests of protecting the
American and Iraqi people of course, made sure the US would go into
Iraq and take care of that nuclear trouble-maker Saddam Hussein.
Just to be safe, Halliburton was paid $40 million for
providing housing and transportation for teams searching for
non-existent weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. For with each
contract Halliburton is and was awarded, Cheney's bank account
grows.
The one place where there were remnants of a nuclear program
in Iraq, albeit over 20 years before the 2003 US invasion, was the
Osirak Nuclear Research Facility on the outskirts of Baghdad.
US-made Israeli warplanes bombed it back on June 7, 1981, and when I
visited the place in January 2004, all I found were empty warehouses
which the American military wasn't concerned about enough to prevent
from being looted.
Villagers in nearby al-Tuwetha, ignorant of radioactive waste
stored in old drums, looted them in the chaos following the invasion
and had been using them as water containers - thus
irradiating the entire village.
One example of what it looks like on the ground in Iraq when
Halliburton fails to fulfill its contractual obligations is the life
of Adel Mhomoud. The 44-year-old beekeeper in al-Tuwetha told me, "I
have cancer, and I know I'm dying. My white blood cell count is
14,000, and I don't have enough red blood cells. We are all sick;
our joints ache, my hips are killing me, and my blood is bad. But
nobody will help us here."
Certainly not Halliburton.
Cheney, who received no less than five military deferments
during the Vietnam War despite being a supporter of that war (Sound
familiar?), had shamelessly told the veterans at the VFW, "Simply
stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of
mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use
against our friends, against our allies, and against us."
So that was the door Cheney took to bring Iraq his
Halliburton.
And of course, once through that door, Halliburton promptly
went to work.
Aside from the aforementioned awarding of no-bid contracts
worth billions of US taxpayer dollars, as early as December 2003,
the US Army found out Halliburton was overcharging the government
$61 million for fuel transportation and $67 million for food
services in Iraq. I remember being in Baghdad when this occurred -
seeing the enormously long gas lines at petrol stations whilst
knowing Halliburton, not only failing to provide Iraqis with their
own petrol, was even charging the US taxpayer three dollars per
gallon for fuel that local companies could have imported for under
one dollar.
But that was barely the beginning.
Let's take a brief glance at some of the more recent
Halliburton/KBR rogueries:
- 27 February 2006 - US Army decides to reimburse KBR nearly
all of its disputed costs on a $2.41 billion no-bid contract to
deliver fuel and repair equipment in Iraq, despite Pentagon
auditors
identifying over $250 million in charges as "potentially"
excessive.
- 17 February 2006 - KBR executive hired to fly cargo into
Iraq
pleads guilty to inflating invoices by $1.14 million to
cover fraudulent "war risk surcharges."
- 6 February 2006 - KBR employee in Iraq, speaking on
condition of anonymity, says "We pay our locals [in Iraq] $5 to
$16 dollars a day and you can see where [KBR] put it down [on
the military requisition] as
$60 a day." Military requisitions reveal KBR to be paying
between $5-$16 per day in wages to third world laborers in Iraq
whilst billing US taxpayers between $50-$80 per day.
- 30 January 2006 - Bush administration settles dispute
between Pentagon and Halliburton by agreeing to pay company $199
million in disputed gasoline charges in Iraq. To date KBR has
been awarded nearly $16 billion in total revenue from Iraq
contracts.
- 23 January 2006 - Halliburton fails to alert American troops
and civilian contractors at US base in Ramadi that their water
was contaminated. Despite allegations which came from
Halliburton's own water quality experts, the
company denies there was a contamination problem.
- 27 December 2005 - KBR, linked to human trafficking-related
concerns via its work in Iraq (such as forced prostitution and
labor), Halliburton benefits from
Defense Department's refusal to adopt policy barring human
trafficking.
- 1 December 2005 - UPI reports KBR workers in Iraq ("third
country" nationals) found to be paid as little as 50 cents an
hour.
- 5 November 2005 - UN auditing board finds that US should
repay Iraqi government $208 million from Iraqi oil revenue for
fraudulent contracting work.
Then there is how these "policies" Halliburton is following
in Iraq affect US soldiers and contractors, including its own
employees.
With contracts in Iraq now worth up to $18 billion, there is
nothing stopping Halliburton from abusing the lack of oversight and
obvious conflict of interest between their free reign and their ties
to the vice president.
An example of this is Jim Spiri, who was hired by
Halliburton/KBR in January 2004 to work as a logistics coordinator.
Sent to Camp Anaconda in Balad, Iraq, he worked the flight line
handling passenger movements, as Spiri had 20 years of aviation
experience.
"During my time there, I assisted nightly with medevac
[medical evacuations] operations and was highly respected among all
military medical folks," he told me this week. "I had a good name
throughout the theatre."
But problems were immediately apparent to him.
"I witnessed much alcohol abuse, in an environment where
alcohol is strictly prohibited. I made note of this and reported it
to my superiors, who actually were the ones abusing the system. It
was obvious that the fox was guarding the hen house, so to speak."
He told me his entire flight line operation was "run in a
gang-like manner" and "the work was never done in an efficient
manner." Instead, according to Spiri, the motto was, "Do as little
as possible for as much as you can, for as long as you can."
On February 5th of this year, while working the night shift
which he had for the last two years, Spiri witnessed something that
made the thought of continuing to work for KBR intolerable.
After watching a fallen soldier loaded onto a plane without
the proper ceremony of honor, Spiri told me he "wrote an account of
what I experienced that night." After this, "It was published, and
... all hell broke loose about 36 hours later."
Spiri was fired by KBR after writing an
article detailing the event and criticizing Halliburton's
policies in Iraq.
Now he wants to shine light on how KBR operates in Iraq.
"What they don't want to let out is the type of workers they have
over there, that it's the largest gravy train operation, it's the
largest welfare system I've ever seen in my life. It's pathetic,"
Spiri said in a recent interview while adding that over half the
people KBR employed in Iraq were "grossly under-qualified and highly
over-paid."
His work entailed three people, but by the time he left there
were 10 people on his team, most of whom "sat around listening to
their iPod's and DVD players."
Yet firing an employee for raising awareness about corruption
and his questioning of policy is minor compared to the treatment of
Iraqis meted out by the company.
When I was in Amman last May, I met Ahlam al-Hassan, a young
Iraqi woman who had worked for KBR in Diwaniyah.
Two gunshots by assailants who attacked her for collaborating
with occupation forces left her
blind, and her former employers would not return her calls or
requests for assistance.
For her three months of work for KBR she was paid $475,
having taken the job to support her family. "My two bosses at KBR,
Mr. Jeff and Mr. Mark, were very good and gentle with me," she
explained to me in Jordan, "They told me it wasn't dangerous to work
for them." But after spending months in hospitals for what happened
to her on her way to work, "After this, they have made no attempts
to contact me."
Note that on May 31, 2004, an Army Corps of Engineers email
revealed that Cheney's office "coordinated" Halliburton's
multi-billion dollar Iraq contract. Cheney, like most common
criminals, denied having anything to do with the no-bid contract.
More recently, on January 26th of this year, Halliburton
announced that its 2005 profits were the "Best in our 86-year
history," as all six of its divisions posted record results.
Halliburton stock price doubled in the last year, and Dick Cheney's
tax returns indicate that he earned $194,862 from his Halliburton
stock in just the last year.
Loot Dick, Loot!
Is that clear enough?
All of this begs the question: Do you approve of your tax
dollars being used in this fashion?
If not, then what are you willing to do about it?
Click below to post a comment on this article
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |