|
Iran threatens new 'killing fields' in nuclear row
By Simon Freeman and agencies
03/07/06 "The
Times" -- -- Iran today intensified its rhetoric in
the row over its suspect nuclear programme, responding to a veiled
threat of military action by promising to become a "killing field".
The threat came as the international nuclear watchdog opened crucial
talks in Vienna on how to dampen Tehran's atomic ambitions.
John Bolton, the hawkish US Ambassador to the United Nations, warned
that the republic faced "painful consquences" if it refused to
comply. In response, the deputy head of Iran's armed forces
retorted: "Iran’s armed forces, through their experience of war,
will turn this land into a killing field for any enemy aggressors."
Representatives from the 35 member states gathered at the
headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) for
last-chance talks aimed at defusing the stand-off through diplomatic
means.
Oil-rich Iran insists that it only wants to carry out nuclear
enrichment activities to produce domestic power, its "God-given
right". Much of the rest of the world suspects that the research is
a front for a covert weapons programme, by a country which has
recently threatened to wipe Israel off the map.
Tehran has been reported to the UN Security Council and diplomats
are meeting this week to agree on carrot-and-stick measures designed
to bring the regime back into line. Iran yesterday raised the stakes
by vowing that it would scale up its research operations into
large-scale uranium enrichment if it was unhappy with the outcome.
Mohamed ElBaradei, who leads the UN's nuclear watchdog body, opened
the week of talks by saying that he remained hopeful a deal could be
reached. He said that there was frantic diplomatic activity to try
to get Tehran and the European Union back to the negotiating table.
"The sticking point remains the question of the centrifuge-related
research and development," he told reporters before the meeting
began. "That issue is still again being discussed this week and I’m
still very much hopeful that in the next week or so an agreement
could be reached."
He said that a deal on small-scale enrichment - which Iran resumed
last month - and a resumption of talks between Tehran and the EU3,
comprising England, Germany and France, would be enough to head off
immediate Security Council action.
Last-ditch negotiations over a compromise proposal, under which
uranium would be enriched for Iran by Russia, broke up without
agreement on Friday.
"There has been lots of progress on many elements of that agreement.
I think there is agreement that industrial-scale enrichment should
be suspended," he said.
He said that Iran was cooperating with inspectors, "but not with the
magnitude and the speed expected".
Ali-Asghar Soltanieh, Iran’s ambassador to the IAEA, reiterated
Tehran’s defiance. "We will not show any flexibility on research and
development," he told AFP in Vienna.
The IAEA board reported Iran to the Security Council on February 4
but left a month open for diplomacy until the world body gets
ElBaradei’s report.
The board is widely expected to set Iran a new 30-day deadline by
which it must halt the nuclear programme and comply with
international inspectors, or face being referred to the Security
Council for further action.
Both the US and the EU3 are thought to favour sanctions targeted on
Iran’s nuclear programme and the clerical elite behind the regime.
This could include a ban on its 100 top leaders travelling outside
Iran, as well as freezing their bank accounts. There is also talk of
soft sanctions, such as banning the football-mad nation's team from
entering the World Cup.
As the IAEA met in Vienna Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of
State, was holding simultaneous talks in Washington with Sergei
Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister.
Russia and China, both of which are permanent members of the UN
Security Council, are reluctant to authorise even limited sanctions.
Time magazine reported that the US will show to the Security Council
diagrams from a computer, stolen from an Iranian nuclear engineer
and obtained by the CIA in 2004, that are believed to depict an
atomic bomb.
Copyright 2006 Times Newspapers Ltd.
Click below to post a comment on this article
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
