|
Caught in the Crossfire
By Mike Whitney
03/10/06 "ICH"
-- -- The events of the last week have created
considerable uncertainty among Iraq-watchers about what is actually
taking place on the ground. It is increasingly difficult to know who
is generating the violence and why. Particularly puzzling, is trying
to identify the motives behind the destruction of the Golden Dome
Mosque and the massive reprisals which occurred with such
astonishing speed that they seemed to be pre-arranged.
Were they?
Were the “grisly attacks and other sectarian violence unleashed by
last week’s bombing”…”which killed more than 1,300 Iraqis”
(Washington Post) merely a spontaneous reaction to the destruction
of the Askariya Mosque, or were they part of a broader strategy to
incite civil war?
And why were so many of those who were killed …“shot, knifed,
garroted or suffocated by plastic bags over their heads”.
(Washington Post) Many others were killed gangland-style with hands
bound behind their backs and a gunshot wound to the head.
Is this the method of killing that we would normally expect from
rampaging mobs, or is it more like a deliberate campaign of terror
designed to spread fear throughout the community.
In Max Fuller’s seminal article, “For Iraq, ‘The
Salvador-Option, becomes Reality”,
Fuller points out that the Iraqi Interior Ministry’s death squads
were, in fact, trained by agents from the CIA who had honed their
skills in Vietnam and El Salvador. (Recently even the New York Times
has admitted that these groups received American training) Fuller
sees the same pattern appearing in Iraq as in other American-backed
counterinsurgency operations. He says:
“In Iraq the war comes in two phases. The first phase is complete:
the destruction of the existing state, which did not comply with the
interests of British and American capital. The second phase consists
of building a new state tied to those interests and smashing every
dissenting sector of society.”
Fuller’s observations are consistent with what we already know about
the deliberate destruction of Iraqi institutions, infrastructure,
trade unions, peasant organizations and academics. The Iraqi state
is being systematically decimated to pave the way for the new order.
Fuller states: “Behind every imperialist counter-insurgency
war…lurks the reality of exploitation and class war, and, as
successive imperialist powers have shown, the bottom line in
combating the hopes and dreams of ordinary people is to resort to
spreading terror through the application of extreme violence. In
Iraq, the Salvador Option may mean returning home to find your
entire family seated at a table with their own severed heads served
to them and a bowl of blood for relish.”
So, how does Fuller’s theory square with the reality of this week’s
violence in Iraq?
Well, for one thing, Iraqi-born novelist, Haifa Zangana, confirms
that there is “a systematic assassination-campaign” directed at
academics and human rights activists which is designed to “destroy
intellectual life in Iraq”. (http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m21084&hd=0&size=1&l=e)
Hundreds of Iraqi intellectuals have been killed without prompting
even one investigation by occupation authorities.
Does that sound intentional?
We also have on record the observations of Construction Minister
Jassem Mohammed Jaafar who investigated the site of the bombed-out
Askariya Mosque and acknowledged that it “was the work of
specialists…..Holes were dug into the mausoleum’s four main pillars
and packed with explosives. Then charges were connected together and
linked to another charge placed just under the dome. The wires were
then linked to a detonator which was triggered at a distance.”
(http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m20998)
Who benefits from such a vicious attack on one of the main icons of
Islamic identity?
Some observers are suggesting that Muqtada al-Sadr, the defiant
adversary of the US occupation, may have been behind the bombing so
that his “black-clad” Mahdi Army could sweep through Baghdad purging
his Sunni enemies.
Could al-Sadr be operating secretly as an agent of Iran establishing
himself as a main-player in a future Iraqi Islamic state?
It’s possible.
After all, The Washington Post states that, “Many of the bodies had
their hands still bound—and many of them had wound up at the morgue
after what their families had said was their abduction by the Mahdi
Army, the Shi’ite militia of Muqtada al-Sadr.”
Al-Sadr has denied any involvement in the carnage that followed the
bombing. But, is he lying? Did agents from the Interior Ministry
dress in black so they would look like the Mahdi Army and, thus,
connect al-Sadr to the hostilities?
It is impossible to know.
We do know, however, that al-Sadr met the very next day with
representatives of the Sunni Association of Muslim Scholars (AMS)
and called for an immediate end to the bloodshed.
He also delivered a speech that was suspiciously omitted from
western press-coverage where he demanded an end to the violence and
an immediate withdrawal of all occupation forces.
He said, “The Iraqi people must not be divided”…”they are one from
north to south”….He called for “joint Friday communal prayers with
both Sunnis and Shiites” affirming that “there are no Sunni or
Shiites mosques, you are a single people.”
“Do you want to give aid to the enemy? Do you want to render the
occupier victorious? Do you wish to make Satan triumphant or do you
wish to help the truth.
No, no to falsehood,” he shouted.
“Our Iraq is passing through a big crisis, insofar as our enemies
are entering among our brethren and spreading turmoil among you.”
“Do not forget the plotting of the Occupation, for if we forget its
plots it will kill us all without exception. This series of attacks
is not the first and it won’t be the last. The attacks will
continue. Beware, and be responsible. Religion is your
responsibility, mosques are your responsibility, the Muslim people
are your responsibility, so do not attack the secure houses of God.
Love one another and be brethren of one another so that our Iraq
will be secure and stable and independent. We want the expulsion of
the Occupier and the American ambassador.” (Juan Cole; “Informed
Comment”)
Is al-Sadr sincere or is this just another political ploy to boost
his popularity?
The problem with al-Sadr’s speech is that it doesn’t fit with the
facts as we know them. The relatives of many of the victims of the
killing spree spoke only of Sadrists, not of death squads. Also, a
number of bloggers have stated unequivocally that it was the Mahdi
Army who led the attacks.
What’s most damaging to al-Sadr, however, is the fact that over
1,300 Iraqis were killed and 200 mosques destroyed in the rampage.
How could the Interior Ministry’s meager death squads kill on a
scale like that? That would require a small army…. the Mahdi Army.
This makes al-Sadr the prime suspect in the Baghdad massacre.
So what does al-Sadr gain from all this?
Well, for the time being he is the most powerful man in Baghdad.
He’s out-maneuvered the Iraqi Security Forces, the US Army, and
Iraq’s Prime Minister al-Jaafari. His ruthlessness and political
cunning have made him Iraq’s newest political powerbroker. Many
people now believe that he is more influential than Supreme
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.
The ascendancy of al-Sadr demonstrates the inability of the United
States to bring either democracy or security to the Iraqi people.
Al-Sadr has simply filled a security-vacuum created by the
occupation. As political analyst Phyllis Bennis says, “The declared
US strategy of training an Iraqi counter-insurgency military force
to replace US and ‘coalition’ troops is a failure.”
The Bush plan has completely backfired and put forces in motion that
can no longer be controlled. The Iraqi-state has been crushed, but a
multi-headed hydra has sprung up in its place making the country
ungovernable. The US now faces an intractable resistance on the one
hand and militia-violence on the other. Both will continue to
gnaw-away relentlessly at America’s vulnerabilities.
Iraq’s devolution into anarchy does not bode well for the
occupation. The factionalized-asymmetrical warfare is best-suited to
disparate groups who can strike at will and disappear into the
crowd. Guerilla attacks counteract the US military’s strongest
assets; high-tech weaponry and overwhelming force. We can expect a
“long slog” as conditions continue to degenerate.
It’s going to be “militia-rule” for quite a while in the new Iraq.
America can either withdraw now or prepare to get caught in the
crossfire.
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
