|
The Smoking Gun
By Mike Whitney
02/27/06 "ICH"
-- --
The AFP is reporting that the bombing of the Golden Domed Mosque
“was the work of specialists” and that the “placing of explosives
must have taken at least 12 hours.”
Construction Minister Jassem Mohammed Jaafar said, “Holes were dug
into the mausoleum’s four main pillars and packed with explosives.
Then charges were connected together and linked to another charge
placed just under the dome. The wires were then linked to a
detonator which was triggered at a distance.”
Clearly, the bombing was not carried out by rogue elements in the
disparate Iraqi resistance. This is the work of highly-trained
saboteurs and bomb-experts who were executing a precision-demolition
to incite sectarian violence. The blast bears all the hallmarks of a
covert Intelligence-agency operation.
Who benefits from such a vicious attack on the foundations of
Islamic identity and culture?
The AFP’s report is consistent with earlier accounts provided by a
Baghdad blogger who demonstrates that the destruction of the mosque
was a “controlled demolition” which required considerable time and
professional expertise. http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m20950. The
photographs of the nearby, but untouched, minarets provide a
shocking example of the bomber’s skill.
Eyewitness accounts have appeared on various web sites claiming that
there were “unusual activities” taking place at the mosque the night
before the bombing. One witness reported that he heard their “cars
the whole night until the next morning”. Another witness who lives
near to the mosque says that at 8:30 that evening he was told “to
stay in your shop and don’t leave the area” while Iraqi National
Guard and American troops “patrolled the area until the next
morning”. At 6:30 AM the American troops left.
At 6:40 the first explosion went off.
Almost immediately, the western media swung into high-gear producing
over 1,000 stories containing the word “civil war” in the first 24
hours. As always, the media reliably regurgitates the narrative that
best serves the interests of management and their political
benefactors. In this case, it’s clear that ‘civil war’ is being used
to divert attacks from occupation forces and pit Iraqis against
Iraqis.
But is this really the plan? After all, how does that make Iraq more
governable?
By now, we should realize that the Bush administration has no plan
to govern Iraq nor do they care a whit about the suffering of the
Iraqi people. The only thing the matters is the extraction of
petroleum from Iraqi oil-fields and its unobstructed transfer to the
market. The rest is rubbish.
“We don’t do body counts”, boasted General Tommy Franks.
Franks could have added that we don’t do reconstruction, security or
governance; all of which are sadly lacking in both Iraq and
Afghanistan. The administration has no intention of rebuilding Iraq
or establishing order. They’ll continue to operate as they have from
the onset; blasting away erratically at the resistance while
concealing the bloodshed behind an impenetrable wall of propaganda.
The present strategy reflects the growing desperation of the
Pentagon planners and the civilian leadership. America is hopelessly
mired in an “unwinnable” war. The choices for action have narrowed
to either withdrawal or a stepped-up campaign of Black-ops designed
to foment sectarian violence. The bombing of the Samarra Mosque fits
perfectly into the latter category.
Henry Kissinger summarized the current Iraq strategy when he offered
his opinion on the Iraq-Iran war in the 1980s. Kissinger callously
averred, “I hope they kill each other.”
The former National Security Chief’s axiom has now been elevated to
the level of state-policy. The Iraq strategy replicates the
Kissinger Doctrine; manipulating chauvinism and cruelty to advance
the imperial agenda.
The demolition of the sacred mosque was a deliberate assault on the
foundations of Muslim identity. It was intended to undermine Iraqi
tradition and culture and weaken confidence in the resistance.
Neocon Michael Ledeen might refer to this as “creative destruction”
but, in fact, it is terrorism writ large; the calculated use of
violence directed at civilians to achieve a political objective.
Translate
this page
(In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |
