Who Stole the 2020 Presidential Election?
Antony Blinken and others have much to answer for
By Philip Giraldi
May 04, 2023:
Information Clearing House --
The corruption engaged in by the
Democratic Party leadership appears to be never-ending and no one is ever
held accountable. A
recent report described how Michael Morell, the former acting
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director, colluded with Antony Blinken,
who was then a senior official in the 2020 Joe Biden presidential campaign,
to prepare and find signatories to a letter to discredit those seeking to
exploit the emerging Hunter Biden laptop scandal, which was threatening to
do real damage to the Biden electoral prospects. Following in the footsteps
of the Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign, which sought to use fabricated
information from the Steele dossier to smear Donald Trump and some of his
advisors, Blinken suggested that Morell promote the argument that the laptop
story involved Russia and should be dismissed as little more than a
disinformation operation ordered by President Vladimir Putin. At the time,
there was no evidence whatsoever to suggest that Russia had had anything to
do with spreading fabricated information regarding Hunter Biden or his
laptop, but that was regarded as immaterial.
The
conspiracy to use a false narrative to corruptly influence the outcome of
the election, for that is what it was, was recently revealed in testimony by
Morell to the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican Representative
Jim Jordan. Morell described how he had been instrumental in convincing 50
other former colleagues in the intelligence and national security community
to sign on to the letter that he had drafted. Morell told the committee that
Blinken acting for the Biden campaign helped to strategize about the timing
and distribution for the public release of the letter and he described how
his two objectives in drafting and releasing the statement was “to help
then-Vice President Biden in the upcoming presidential debate and assist him
in winning the election.”
Get Our Free Newsletter
Presumably Morell, known for his ambition and
ruthlessness, may have expected Biden to appoint him head of the CIA when it
came time to hand out rewards after the election was over. Concerning his
own political ambitions and inclinations, one recalls how in 2016 Morell
wrote
an op-ed in the New York Times that was picked up nationally
which headlined “I ran the CIA: now I’m endorsing Hillary Clinton.”
By virtue
of exploiting his own top level connections inside the Agency, five of
Morell’s letter’s signatories were former Directors of the CIA. The letter
included the assertion by the signatories that they were “deeply suspicious
that the Russian government played a significant role in this case…If we are
right this is Russia trying to influence how Americans vote in this
election, and we believe strongly that Americans need to be aware of this.”
It concluded that the laptop allegations exhibited “all the classic earmarks
of a Russian information operation.”
After
the letter was prepared, Blinken advised Morell on its most advantageous
timing, selecting a date close to the election so it would have maximum
impact. The laptop story itself
had appeared in the New York Post on October 14th,
revealing emails demonstrating how the Vice President Joe Biden appeared to
have
pressured Ukrainian officials into firing a prosecutor who was
investigating corruption in the energy company Burisma. Joe met with a top
company official, which led to the granting of a sinecure position on the
Burisma board to his influence peddling son Hunter, which paid him $50,000
per month. Material also included on the laptop revealed Hunter’s moral
turpitude and drug use.
The
Morell rebuttal
appeared in Politico five days later, two weeks before the
election, on October 19th, and was picked up by the mainstream
media all over the United States. Joe Biden also used the material in his
debate with Trump on October 22nd, accusing Moscow of targeting
his son in an elaborate propaganda operation, claiming that the laptop story
was
“garbage” and part of a “Russian plan.” Biden referred to the many
signatures on the intelligence community letter to declare that “nobody
believes” that the laptop is real. And the denial did have a genuine impact
on the campaign. After the Morell letter appeared, nearly all major social
and news media platforms that had allowed linking to or discussion of the
Hunter laptop story either censored the material completely or limited
access to it while also posting warnings that the tale had been debunked by
knowledgeable experts. Also to be considered is how the Blinken-Morell
letter fueled the false perception that Russia and Putin were supporting
Trump through clandestine and underhanded means.
Investigative journalist Jim Bovard,
writing in the New York Post, reports ironically how
Secretary of State Antony Blinken in the closing speech at last month’s
Summit for Democracy “piously proclaimed” that “As President Biden has said,
democracy doesn’t happen by accident. ‘It requires constant effort.’” And
shortly after he became Secretary of State, Blinken had had the nerve to
claim that the US government doesn’t sweep problems “under the rug… We deal
with them in the daylight, with full transparency.” Indeed, Blinken may have
been rewarded by Biden with his cabinet position after his successful
plausibly illegal intervention. Also apparently rewarded was a signatory on
the Morell letter – Avril Haines who is now Director of National
Intelligence.
To be
sure, the “honorable” Secretary of State Antony Blinken should now be
instead offering his resignation over the exposure of his blatant and
possibly successful attempt to change the outcome of an election by
conspiring to corrupt the electoral process with false information to sway
voters. Bovard opines how the Morell letter defused what had become “the
biggest threat to the Biden presidential campaign … Polls show that Biden
would have lost the election if the media had accurately reported the
contents of that laptop.”
And
there’s more to the Hunter Biden story and the corrupt hand of government.
An IRS employee has recently turned
whistleblower and stated that his Agency has been moving sluggishly on
an investigation of Hunter regarding tax evasion relating to foreign income
derived largely from Ukraine and China. And he claims that another senior
Biden appointed official is involved in the politically motivated foot
dragging. No less than Attorney General Merrick Garland has been identified
as the unnamed senior official whose sworn testimony to a congressional
committee is being challenged in a letter from the whistleblower’s attorney
alleging
a cover-up of the Hunter Biden criminal investigation. Attorney Mark
Lytle wrote that the longtime IRS employee would like to provide information
to congressional leaders to “contradict sworn testimony to Congress by a
senior political appointee” — now identified as Garland — and also to
provide details of claimed “preferential treatment” in the criminal probe of
Hunter.
One
more tale just might illustrate where this country is going under Joe Biden
and company, where party and personal interests are all that matter to a
leadership which regards “integrity” as a dirty word. In fact, the
government has become increasingly intolerant of speech or writing that in
any way challenges its power, exposes its corruption, reveals its lies, and
encourages the citizenry to resist government overreach. The Biden
Administration
has recently indicted four Americans and charged them with conspiracy to
spread Russian propaganda and acting as unregistered Russian agents under
the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) of 1938. The four are members of
the African People’s Socialist Party, which has criticized and opposed US
foreign policy since 1971 and currently is against Washington’s promotion of
the war against Russia in Ukraine. They potentially face 15 years in prison.
This exploitation of quite plausibly unconstitutional “lawfare” is nothing
new, as in my own experience the Justice (sic) Department has been moving to
silence Americans who write for Russian news sites by threatening them with
huge fines or even imprisonment. It is a tendency that is unfortunately not
unique to any particular presidential administration which has been building
since 9/11, though it has become far worse under Joe Biden and Merrick
Garland. In no cases that I know of have any of those pressured or accused
actually been receiving direction or secret benefits from the Russian
government.
That
all means that the definition of illegal speech or writing has been
considerably broadened of late. The Biden Administration has been actively
waging a campaign to eradicate what it chooses to call “disinformation,” to
include those who allegedly share “false
or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis-
dis- and mal-information” with terrorists. It is, in fact, the United
States government that is the world’s largest purveyor of disinformation, to
include adopting the Israeli practice of defining anyone who resists US
hegemony as a terrorist. For example, that is how the Justice Department
labels white so-called supremacists as “domestic terrorists.”
And, of
course, the government is being assisted and protected due to the fact that
nearly all the negative stories about Biden and his crew have predictably
been suppressed by the mainstream media, which has become a de facto
a partner of the White House disinformation program. Consider, for example,
the Seymour Hersh revelations about the hideous “act of war” Nord Stream
pipeline destruction and the corruption in Ukraine, or the revelation of
disinformation regarding the war in Ukraine itself exposed by leaker Jack
Teixeira, or the biolabs in Ukraine, or the incessant lies denigrating
Russia and its leadership. And where does one go to for any legitimate
criticism of the reckless White House driven direct engagement in Ukraine
that could go nuclear even though it is in support of no real national
interest? Or the thoughtless threatening of China over Taiwan? And how about
the State Department using overseas Embassies
to promote “woke-ism” rather than protecting American travelers and
interests? All these stories are targeted and diminished deliberately, gone
or going, never to be seen again.
So it
should surprise no one that the White House and media are right now trying
to kill the exposure of how Blinken and Morell turned around the story of
the Hunter laptop because that would confirm suspicions that Joe Biden may
have actually stolen the 2020 election. And the back story is that the
fabricated material planted by the Clinton and Biden campaigns in 2016 and
2020 only succeeded because of the media’s surrender of its traditional role
as an exposer of government crimes and evasions. The phony Morell
intelligence letter and its possible consequences is a scandal of huge
proportions that would once upon a time have ended in resignations,
impeachment, and plenty of jail time for all of those involved but Michael
Morell and Antony Blinken have not even been touched or even interviewed by
the FBI. Nor have the other fifty national security puppets who signed off
onto claims made in a document that they must have known to be fabricated
for political reasons experienced any discomfort. They have no shame and are
all disgraces to the oath of loyalty to the Constitution that they once
swore. And the real danger is that if the clueless government and media
continue to be able to bury stories they do not approve of, the United
States will cease to be a functioning democracy and every election will be
little more than a farce.
Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the
National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal
ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy
in the Middle East. Website is
councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157,
Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is
inform@cnionline.org.