The Single Dumbest Thing The Empire Asks Us To Believe
By Caitlin Johnstone
May 01, 2023:
Information
Clearing House-- The
single dumbest thing the US-centralized empire asks us to believe is that the
military encirclement of its top two geopolitical rivals is a
defensive action, rather than an act of extreme aggression.
We’re asked to believe many extremely stupid narratives by the
manipulators who rule over us, but I really think this one might take the
cake. The idea that the US militarily encircling
Russia and
China is an act of defense rather than aggression is so in-your-face
transparently idiotic that anyone who thinks critically enough about it will
immediately dismiss it for the foam-brained nonsense that it is, yet it’s the
mainstream narrative in the western world, and millions of people accept it as
true. Because that’s the power of US propaganda.
It gets more and more absurd the more you think about it. Their argument is
basically, “No no you don’t understand, the US has been hurriedly surrounding
its primary geopolitical competitors with war machinery because it wants to
prevent them from doing something
aggressive.” They’re like, “We can’t just have nations exerting
military aggression willy nilly, that’s why we needed to move all this war
machinery to the other side of the planet onto the borders of our primary
strategic rivals.”
Can you think of anything more insane than that? Than all of the most powerful
and influential figures in politics, government and media simultaneously
claiming that a nation amassing heavily-armed proxy forces on the borders of
their enemies is something that should be regarded as an action designed to
prevent aggression, rather than an incendiary act of extreme
aggression in and of itself?
I recently had someone
tell me that the US has every right to expand its immense military presence
near China, and to illustrate their point they said that if China set up a base
in Mexico the US would have no business telling them not to. But that argument
actually illustrates my point, not theirs: only the most
propaganda-addled of minds would believe that the US would allow China to set up
a military base in Mexico for even one second. There’d be kinetic warfare long
before the foundations were even poured.
What this undeniably means is that the US is the aggressor in these conflicts.
It was the aggressor when it
expanded NATO and began
turning Ukraine into a de facto NATO member, and it is the aggressor as it
accelerates its
encirclement of China and prepares to
open the floodgates of weapons into Taiwan. If it is doing things on the
borders of its geopolitical rivals that it would never permit those rivals to do
to it, then it is the aggressor, and anything its rivals do is a defensive
response to those aggressions.
This is how the US-centralized empire always acts. It continually attacks,
starves and menaces nations which disobey the decrees it issues in its
self-appointed role as the leader of the so-called “rules-based international
order”, then as soon as its aggressions receive the slightest bit of pushback
its spinmeisters feign Bambi-eyed innocence and pretend they’re just passive
witnesses to unprovoked aggression by the disobedient nations.
But the empire is not passive, it is not
innocent, and it is primarily responsible for the extremely dangerous current
and emerging conflicts we are seeing on the world stage. The US empire is
imperiling us all with its last-ditch frantic scramble to secure unipolar
planetary hegemony before multipolarity takes over, engaging in freakishly
aggressive actions on the borders of the nuclear-armed nations who challenge its
power.
And I just think that’s worth reiterating from time to time. If we don’t keep
reminding ourselves what’s true, these bastards will drive us all nuts.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)