explained
back in 2015,
the only chemical weapons in Iraq were either
(A) munitions sealed in bunkers at an Iraqi
weapons complex by U.N. inspectors in the
nineties and left there because they were too
dangerous to move, and (B) some old munitions
that had been lost and forgotten after the
Iran-Iraq War. In neither of these cases is it
true that Saddam Hussein was hiding any weapons
of mass destruction.
Frum claims
that “The United States went to war to build a
democracy in Iraq,” which is an infantile fairy
tale only idiots and children believe. Iraq was
invaded because
it was an oil-rich nation in
a geostrategically
crucial region whose
leader had been insufficiently servile to U.S.
energy interests. Probably didn’t help that it
was also moving toward re-normalizing
relations with Iran.
Frum hilariously
claims that “What the U.S. did in Iraq was not
an act of unprovoked aggression,” and shows that
he has learned absolutely nothing about anything
by criticizing the Obama administration for not
invading Syria to enforce “its own declared red
lines” on chemical weapons allegations.
Frum begins the
article by calling the war “a grave and costly
error,” but by the end he has completely walked
this back by gushing about how much better it
made things for Iraqis. He says that “ISIS has
been destroyed in Iraq and reduced to a tiny
foothold in Syria” and “Jihadist terrorism has
receded across the Arab Middle East,” and
that the ensuing “stability” has had “economic
benefits” for Iraqis, like greater oil exports.
Frum makes the
unfalsifiable fantasy claim that things would
have been just as bad for Iraqis if the U.S.
hadn’t invaded, saying “Whether Iraq had an
alternative future that would have been much
better for the country and its people seems very
doubtful to me.” [For one thing, hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis would still be alive.]
“Imperfect as Iraqi
governance is, thanks to the U.S. intervention,
the country has for the first time in its
independent history a political system that is
in some measure accountable to its people,” Frum
writes.
Frum closes with a
paragraph that continues The Atlantic’s long and ongoing
pattern of
churning out think pieces which use the war in
Ukraine to rehabilitate the image of the neocons:
“The
invasion of Ukraine has recalled the peoples
of the Western democracies to themselves.
There are times when free people must fight
in self-defense. That truth must not be
lost, whatever lessons we draw from the Iraq
War. And perhaps the commitment to share
that freedom with the people of Iraq is not
yet lost either.
They have
gained a chance, and their story is not
over.”
Max Boot’s article
is titled “What
the Neocons Got Wrong“,
and it’s published in Foreign Affairs.
Boot was one of the earliest influential
proponents of the Iraq invasion, penning a
now-notorious essay for the neoconservative
Weekly Standard titled “The
Case for American Empire”
a month after 9/11. Boot’s 2001 screed called
for “a U.S. invasion and occupation” of Iraq,
predicting a swift and easy victory and saying
that “Once we have deposed Saddam, we can impose
an American-led, international regency in
Baghdad, to go along with the one in Kabul.”
Boot’s sentiments
on Iraq today are more contrite than Frum’s,
unequivocally denouncing the war and the idea of
promoting democracy by military force, but
there’s still a lot of warmongering bullshit in
his Foreign Affairs piece.
“Both South Korea
and South Vietnam were worth defending from
communist aggression, but the Koreans showed
greater skill and willingness to fight for their
own freedom than the South Vietnamese did,” Boot
proclaims out of fucking nowhere.
“I am a neocon no
more,” Boot declares, before making it clear
that he has simply pivoted from supporting
Republican wars to supporting Democrat wars like
the proxy war in Ukraine. Boot says “Ukraine
easily meets the test” for justifiable U.S.
interventionism, and calls President Volodymyr
Zelensky “a Churchillian figure worthy of the
United States’ unstinting support.”
Despite his
denunciation of neoconservatism, Boot has been
an exceptionally hawkish supporter of the same
U.S. proxy war that all his Bush-era neocon
buddies have rallied behind in the last year. In
his regular opinion column for The
Washington Post he has been one of the
loudest voices pushing for the U.S. to pour
more powerful weapons into Ukraine,
and even went
on a trip with U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd
Austin to
write war propaganda about the need for the U.S.
alliance to send more tanks there.
(While we’re on the
subject, why does The Washington Post
need to give regular opinion columns to Max
Boot, John
Bolton, Jennifer
Rubin, and Josh
Rogin? They’re
all warmongering neocons. I think even neocons
would agree that’s too many neocons.)
But of greater
significance than the specific words that David
Frum and Max Boot have published is the fact
that their words are being published at all. It
is absolutely insane that the people who helped
unleash the horror that was the Iraq War upon
the world are not only not in prison, but are
actively uplifted and celebrated on the most
influential platforms in the western world.
These freaks shouldn’t be able to get jobs of
any greater influence than working behind a cash
register, and they should have a harder time
getting those jobs than convicted felons. They
certainly shouldn’t be given a platform to write
about the very crime they helped orchestrate.
But such is the
civilization we find ourselves in. The empire
elevates those who serve the empire, and
marginalizes those who speak out against it.
David Frum and Max Boot are massively amplified
celebrity pundits not in spite of
their past misdeeds but exactly because of
them. They have proved themselves to be reliable
servants of the empire, and the empire has
rewarded them accordingly.
In a remotely sane
society, this would not be the case. In a
remotely sane society, such creatures would be
regarded with the same revulsion and rejection
as child molesters. These people are worse than
serial killers, because they’ve got body counts
that Jeffrey Dahmer or John Wayne Gacy could
only dream of.
Here’s hoping that
one day we live in a society that has become so
healthy that it is no longer acceptable to be a
neocon.
Caitlin's articles are entirely
reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece
please consider sharing it around, liking her on
Facebook, following her antics
on
Twitter, checking out her
podcast, throwing some money
into her hat on
Patreon or
Paypal, or buying her book
Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
New book! Lao
Sue And Other Poems,
available in
paperback
or
PDF/ebook.
-
https://caitlinjohnstone.com
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Reader financed- No
Advertising - No Government Grants -
No Algorithm - This
Is Independent