“It seems probable
that Russia will impose a solution.
If, as expected, it becomes clear that the
West can’t or won’t negotiate, it will
behoove Russia to implement a maximalist
solution. Or alternatively, Russia
“bargains” by showing that it can create
a dead zone in Western Ukraine as big as it
likes. If Ukraine and its US minders
don’t come to their senses, that dead zone
will be awfully big.”
Yves Smith, Naked Capitalism
How does this end?
How does
Russia create a “neutral” Ukraine that isn’t
armed-to-the-teeth by Moscow’s enemies? How do
they prevent Kiev from conducting joint-military
drills with NATO or placing missile sites on
Russia’s border? How do they stop the Ukrainian
Army from shelling ethnic Russians in the east
or training far-right paramilitaries to kill as
many Russians as possible? How does Putin change
Ukraine into a good neighbor that doesn’t pose a
security threat and that doesn’t fuel
anti-Russian hatred and bigotry? And, finally,
how does one resolve the conflict peacefully if
one side refuses to negotiate with the other?
Check out this clip from an article at Mint
News:
“Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday signed a
decree formally announcing the “impossible”
prospect of peace negotiations between
Ukraine and Russian President Vladimir
Putin…
“He (Putin) does not
know what dignity and honesty are.
Therefore, we are ready for dialogue with
Russia, but with another president of
Russia,” Zelensky said on Friday. (Mint
News)
The fact that Zelensky
will not negotiate with Putin does not mean
there will be no settlement. It just means that
Zelensky will have no voice in the outcome. As
the more powerful country, it has always been
within Russia’s ability to impose a settlement
that achieves its basic national security
objectives, and that is precisely what Putin
will do. The settlement will not be ideal nor
will it completely end the hostilities, but it
will provide a layer of protection from Russia’s
enemies which is the best that can be hoped
for given the circumstances. Regrettably, the
settlement will also terminate Ukraine’s
existence as a viable, contiguous state.
And– after Russia has finished its special
military operation– Ukraine will face a dismal
future as a deindustrialized wastelands that is
entirely dependent on its allies in the west for
its survival.
Here is an excerpt from
an article by Moscow-based journalist John
Helmer who thinks the Russian army will clear
a vast area of central Ukraine in its upcoming
winter offensive, and that much of that land
will become part of a 100 kilometer-wide
Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) that will protect
Russia from Ukrainian missile and artillery
attacks. As Helmer notes, the model for this
military-imposed settlement is “the armistice of
Panmunjom of July 27, 1953, which ended the
Korean War…. On the ground inside the UDZ
(Ukraine Demilitarized Zone) there may be no
electricity, no people, nothing except for the
means to monitor and enforce the terms of the
armistice.” Here’s more from Helmer:
Military source:….
Once the destruction of these targets has
been completed, the remnants of the
infrastructure will be mined, and the area
planted with sensing devices. The armies
will then begin a rapid, staged withdrawal
behind Russian lines where the process of
fortification and entrenchment has already
begun.”
“Civilians and
disarmed Ukrainian troops – except for the
Ukro-Nazi units — will be allotted one or
two corridors through which they will be
permitted to leave the zone. They’d better
not dawdle.”…
The sources agree
there will be a new military demarcation
line before the thaw next spring; they
differ on how it is being drawn now, and how
it will look next April. “For now the
line will be on the Dnieper with the zone
extending from the west bank into the rump
Ukraine – my guess is at a depth of not
less than 100km. This will put Russian
territory out of the range of most Ukrainian
artillery. A 100km-deep zone will also give
the Russian forces time to detect and
intercept anything in flight…
“In the northern
sector – that’s from Kramatorsk and
Slovyansk to Kharkov… these are garrisons
and staging areas of hate on or near to
Russia’s borders; they will not be spared
….(and) have qualified them for
de-electrification, de-population, and de-nazification.”
“The point to
emphasize, especially in the Russian
operations in the north… will not seize and
hold territory. … The idea won’t be to
occupy the territory, let alone administer
it, for any length of time. The goal will be
to destroy enemies who raise their heads and
the infrastructure they rely on; lay mines
and sensors; and then withdraw.”
“Once the assigned
transportation and logistics nodes have been
taken, the job of destroying them by
engineer units will begin. Bridges,
roads, railroads, marshalling yards, rolling
stock, airfields, fuel storage and
dispensaries, electrical substations,
transmission and communications towers,
central offices, warehouses, laydown areas,
agricultural equipment – anything that could
possibly be used to support the
Ukrainian-NATO effort east of the zone’s
western border will be destroyed. That
will be also be the ground forces’ job –
more comprehensive and thorough than missile
and drone strikes can achieve.”
“Civilians and
disarmed fighters, without their motorized
equipment, will be permitted to walk out of
the zone to specially prepared buses (as
Surovikin supervised in Syria) with whatever
they can carry on their backs…. Anyone
who chooses to stay inside the zone will be
informed explicitly via radio, flyers, and
loudspeaker that they are considered enemy
combatants and will be targeted accordingly.
After a prescribed amount of time, the
‘golden bridges’ for the exiting population
will be destroyed. For those remaining
they will have had no power, sanitation, or
communications …”(“Ukraine
Armistice– How the UDZ of 2023 will separate
the Armies like the Korean DMZ of 1953”,
John Helmer, Dances With Bears
Helmer sums it up
perfectly. Putin is going to create a vast,
uninhabitable no-man’s-land in the center of
Ukraine that will separate east from west and
end Ukraine’s existence as a viable, contiguous
state. This is what a military-imposed
settlement looks like. It’s not ideal and it
doesn’t necessarily stop all the fighting, but
it does address Russia’s basic security
requirements which Washington chose to ignore.
Rest assured, that
Washington will not like this settlement and
will never agree to the new borders. But the
United States will not have the final say-so in
this matter and that is extremely important,
because Washington’s role as the “guarantor
of global security” is now a thing of the past.
Russia is going to decide Ukraine’s borders and
that’s just the way it’s going to be. So,
yes, we can expect to hear the gnashing of teeth
at NATO Headquarters and the UN and at the White
House, but to little effect. The matter is
settled unless, of course, the US and NATO want
to commit ground forces to the conflict which,
we think, will precipitate a split in NATO that
will inevitably lead to its collapse. Either
way, Ukraine’s fate is going to be decided in
Moscow not Washington, and that reality is going
to have a significant impact of the distribution
of global power. There’s a new sheriff in town
and he is definitely not an American.
Bottom line: We think
Helmer’s analysis is the most probable scenario
going forward. Putin has showed admirable
restraint to this point, but after 9 months of
pointless drudgery and carnage, it’s time to
wrap this thing up. Moscow has always had a
sledgehammer in its toolkit and now it’s going
to use it. We would have preferred that it
didn’t end this way, but there’s no sense in
crying over spilt milk. Washington wanted to
stretch this war out for as long as possible to
bleed Russia dry so it couldn’t project power
beyond its borders or obstruct US plans to
“pivot to Asia”. But Putin foiled that plan.
He didn’t step into Washington’s trap and he’s
not going to pump blood and money down a black
hole. He’s going to settle this matter
once-and-for-all and be done with it. This
is from an interview with Colonel Douglas
MacGregor:
“This entire
conflict could have been avoided had we
simply recognized Moscow’s legitimate
interests in what happens in Ukraine….
What happens in Ukraine is important to
Russians…. So, we could have intervened
early on and said, ‘Let’s have a ceasefire
and talk’, in fact, we could have
listened to the Russians for the last 10 or
20 years about their concerns about what was
happening inside Ukraine. And, I think
now we see with the Zelensky regime– a very
dangerous government that is incurably
hostile to Russia (and) that responds
exclusively to instructions from Washington–
that has decided that it wants to fatally
weaken Russia in any way possible… The
solution to this is –not to join this futile
and pointlessly destructive war with Moscow–
(but) to get some sense into peoples’ minds
in the government in Kiev.”
Colonel Douglas MacGregor, “Ukraine is
about to be Annihilated”, You Tube; 2:10
minute-mark
IMO, the decision has
already been made. Ukraine is going to be split
in two whether Washington likes it or not.
That’s just the way it is.
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House. in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Reader financed- No
Advertising - No Government Grants -
No Algorithm - This
Is Independent
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)