In an article on May 13, 2014 in
The Guardian,
republished here, John Pilger warned the “U.S.
is threatening to take the world to war” over
Ukraine, words that have taken on new meaning.
By John Pilger
October 05, 2022:
Information Clearing House-- "Consortium
News"Why
do we tolerate the threat of another world war
in our name? Why do we allow lies that justify
this risk? The scale of our indoctrination, wrote
Harold Pinter,
is a “brilliant, even witty, highly successful
act of hypnosis”, as if the truth “never
happened even while it was happening”.
Every year the
American historian William
Blum publishes
his “updated summary of the record of U.S.
foreign policy” which shows that, since 1945,
the U.S. has tried to overthrow more than 50
governments, many of them democratically
elected; grossly interfered in elections in 30
countries; bombed the civilian populations of 30
countries; used chemical and biological weapons;
and attempted to assassinate foreign leaders.
In many cases
Britain has been a collaborator. The degree of
human suffering, let alone criminality, is
little acknowledged in the west, despite the
presence of the world’s most advanced
communications and nominally most free
journalism. That the most numerous victims of
terrorism – “our” terrorism – are Muslims, is
unsayable. That extreme jihadism, which led to
9/11, was nurtured as a weapon of Anglo-American
policy (Operation
Cyclone in
Afghanistan) is suppressed. In April the U.S.
state department noted that, following Nato’s
campaign in 2011, “Libya
has become a terrorist safe haven“.
The name of “our”
enemy has changed over the years, from communism
to Islamism, but generally it is any society
independent of western power and occupying
strategically useful or resource-rich territory,
or merely offering an alternative to U.S.
domination.
The leaders of
these obstructive nations are usually violently
shoved aside, such as the democrats Muhammad
Mossedeq in Iran,
Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala and
Salvador Allende in Chile,
or they are murdered like Patrice
Lumumba in the
Democratic Republic of Congo. All are subjected
to a western media campaign of vilification –
think Fidel Castro, Hugo Chávez, now Vladimir
Putin.
Washington’s role
in Ukraine is
different only in its implications for the rest
of us. For the first time since the Reagan
years, the U.S. is threatening to take the world
to war. With eastern Europe and the Balkans now
military outposts of Nato, the last “buffer
state” bordering Russia – Ukraine – is being
torn apart by fascist forces unleashed by the
U.S. and the EU. We in the west are now backing
neo-Nazis in a country where Ukrainian Nazis
backed Hitler.
Having masterminded
the coup in February against the democratically
elected government in Kiev, Washington’s planned
seizure of Russia’s historic, legitimate
warm-water naval base in Crimea failed. The
Russians defended themselves, as they have done
against every threat and invasion from the west
for almost a century.
But Nato’s military
encirclement has accelerated, along with
U.S.-orchestrated attacks on ethnic Russians in
Ukraine. If Putin can be provoked into coming to
their aid, his pre-ordained “pariah” role will
justify a Nato-run guerrilla war that is likely
to spill into Russia itself.
Instead, Putin has
confounded the war party by seeking an
accommodation with Washington and the EU, by
withdrawing Russian troops from the Ukrainian
border and urging ethnic Russians in eastern
Ukraine to abandon the weekend’s provocative
referendum.
These
Russian-speaking and bilingual people – a third
of Ukraine’s population – have long sought a
democratic federation that reflects the
country’s ethnic diversity and is both
autonomous of Kiev and independent of Moscow.
Most are neither “separatists” nor “rebels”, as
the western media calls them, but citizens who
want to live securely in their homeland.
Like the ruins of
Iraq and Afghanistan, Ukraine has been turned
into a C.I.A. theme park – run personally by
C.I.A. director John Brennan in Kiev, with
dozens of “special units” from the C.I.A. and
F.B.I. setting up a “security structure” that
oversees savage attacks on those who opposed the
February coup. Watch the videos, read the
eye-witness reports from the massacre in Odessa
this month. Bussed fascist thugs
burned the trade union headquarters,
killing 41 people trapped inside. Watch the
police standing by.
A doctor described
trying to rescue people, “but I was stopped by
pro-Ukrainian Nazi radicals. One of them pushed
me away rudely, promising that soon me and other
Jews of Odessa are going to meet the same fate.
What occurred yesterday didn’t even take place
during the fascist occupation in my town in
world war two. I wonder, why the whole world is
keeping silent.” [see footnote]
Russian-speaking
Ukrainians are fighting for survival. When Putin
announced the withdrawal of Russian troops from
the border, the Kiev junta’s defence secretary,
Andriy Parubiy – a founding member of the
fascist Svoboda party – boasted that attacks on
“insurgents” would continue. In Orwellian style,
propaganda in the west has inverted this to
Moscow “trying
to orchestrate conflict and provocation“,
according to William Hague. His cynicism is
matched by Obama’s grotesque congratulations to
the coup junta on its “remarkable
restraint”
after the Odessa massacre. The junta, says Obama,
is “duly elected”. As Henry
Kissinger once said:
“It is not a matter of what is true that counts,
but what is perceived to be true.”
In the U.S. media
the Odessa atrocity has been played down as
“murky” and a “tragedy” in which “nationalists”
(neo-Nazis) attacked “separatists” (people
collecting signatures for a referendum on a
federal Ukraine). Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street
Journal damned the victims – “Deadly
Ukraine Fire Likely Sparked by Rebels,
Government Says“.
Propaganda in Germany has been pure cold war,
with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung warning
its readers of Russia’s “undeclared war”. For
the Germans, it is a poignant irony that Putin
is the only leader to condemn the rise of
fascism in 21st-century Europe.
A popular truism is
that “the world changed” following 9/11. But
what has changed? According to the great
whistleblower Daniel
Ellsberg,
a silent coup has taken place in Washington and
rampant militarism now rules. The Pentagon
currently runs “special operations” – secret
wars – in 124 countries. At home, rising poverty
and a loss of liberty are the historic corollary
of a perpetual war state. Add the risk of
nuclear war, and the question is: why do we
tolerate this?
Views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House. in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
Reader financed- No
Advertising - No Government Grants -
No Algorithm - This
Is Independent
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)