Washington’s hard power display of taking
out Al-Qaeda’s Al-Zawahiri will not be
reciprocated by Beijing over Pelosi’s
provocative visit to Taiwan. It does
however, definitively bury the decades-long
era of cooperative US-Chinese relations.
By Pepe Escobar
August 03, 2022:
Information Clearing House
-- "The
Cradle" -
This is the way the “Global War
on Terror” (GWOT) ends, over and over again:
not with a bang, but a whimper.
Two Hellfire R9-X missiles launched from
a MQ9 Reaper drone on the balcony of a house
in Kabul. The target was Ayman Al-Zawahiri
with a $25 million bounty on his head. The
once invisible leader of ‘historic’ Al-Qaeda
since 2011, is finally terminated.
All of us who spent years of our lives,
especially throughout the 2000s, writing
about and tracking Al-Zawahiri know how US
‘intel’ played every trick in the book – and
outside the book – to find him. Well, he
never exposed himself on the balcony of a
house, much less in Kabul.
Get Our Free Newsletter
Another disposable asset
Why now? Simple. Not useful anymore – and
way past his expiration date. His fate was
sealed as a tawdry foreign policy ‘victory’
– the remixed Obama ‘Osama bin Laden moment’
that won’t even register across most of the
Global South. After all, a perception reigns
that George W. Bush’s GWOT has long
metastasized into the “rules-based,”
actually “economic sanctions-based”
international order.
Cue to 48 hours later, when hundreds of
thousands across the west were glued to the
screen of flighradar24.com (until the
website was hacked), tracking “SPAR19” – the
US Air Force jet carrying House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi – as it slowly crossed
Kalimantan from east to west, the Celebes
Sea, went northward parallel to the eastern
Philippines, and then made a sharp swing
westwards towards Taiwan, in a spectacular
waste of jet fuel to evade the South China
Sea.
No “Pearl Harbor moment”
Now compare it with hundreds of millions
of Chinese who are not on Twitter but on
Weibo, and a leadership in Beijing that is
impervious to western-manufactured pre-war,
post-modern hysteria.
Anyone who understands Chinese culture
knew there would never be a “missile on a
Kabul balcony” moment over Taiwanese
airspace. There would never be a replay of
the perennial neocon wet dream: a “Pearl
Harbor moment.” That’s simply not the
Chinese way.
The day after, as the narcissist Speaker,
so proud of accomplishing her stunt, was
awarded the Order of Auspicious Clouds for
her promotion of bilateral US-Taiwan
relations, the Chinese Foreign Minister
issued a sobering comment: the reunification
of Taiwan with the mainland is a historical
inevitability.
That’s how you focus, strategically, in
the long game.
What happens next had already been
telegraphed, somewhat hidden in a Global
Times
report. Here are the two key points:
Point 1: “China will see it as a
provocative action permitted by the Biden
administration rather than a personal
decision made by Pelosi.”
That’s exactly what President Xi Jinping
had personally told the teleprompt-reading
White House tenant during a tense phone call
last week. And that concerns the ultimate
red line.
Xi is now reaching the exact same
conclusion reached by Russian President
Vladimir Putin earlier this year: the United
States is “non-agreement capable,” and
there’s no point in expecting it to respect
diplomacy and/or rule of law in
international relations.
Point 2 concerns the consequences,
reflecting a consensus among top Chinese
analysts that mirrors the consensus at the
Politburo: “The Russia-Ukraine crisis has
just let the world see the consequence of
pushing a major power into a corner… China
will steadily speed up its process of
reunification and declare the end of US
domination of the world order.”
Chess, not checkers
The Sinophobic matrix predictably
dismissed Xi’s reaction to the fact on the
ground – and in the skies – in Taiwan,
complete with rhetoric exposing the
“provocation by American reactionaries” and
the “uncivilized campaign of the
imperialists.”
This may be seen as Xi playing Chairman
Mao. He may have a point, but the rhetoric
is pro forma. The crucial fact is that Xi
was personally humiliated by Washington and
so was the Communist Party of China (CPC), a
major loss of face – something that in
Chinese culture is unforgivable. And all
that compounded with a US tactical victory.
So the response will be inevitable, and
it will be classic Sun Tzu: calculated,
precise, tough, long-term and strategic –
not tactical. That takes time because
Beijing is not ready yet in an array of
mostly technological domains. Putin had to
wait years for Russia to act decisively.
China’s time will come.
For now, what’s clear is that as much as
with Russia-US relations last February, the
Rubicon has been crossed in the US-China
sphere.
The price of collateral damage
The Central Bank of Afghanistan bagged a
paltry
$40 million in cash as ‘humanitarian
aid’ soon after that missile on a balcony in
Kabul.
So that was the price of the Al-Zawahiri
operation, intermediated by the currently
US-aligned Pakistani intelligence agency,
the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). So
cheap.
The MQ-9 Reaper drone carrying the two
Hellfire R9X that killed Al-Zawahiri had to
fly over
Pakistani airspace – taking off from a
US base in the Persian Gulf, traversing the
Arabian Sea, and flying over Balochistan to
enter Afghanistan from the south. The
Americans may have also got human
intelligence as a bonus.
A 2003 deal, according to which Islamabad
facilitates air corridors for US military
flights, may have expired with the American withdrawal
debacle last August, but could always be
revived.
No one should expect a deep dive
investigation on what exactly the ISI –
historically very close to the Taliban –
gave to Washington on a silver platter.
Dodgy dealings
Cue to an intriguing phone call last week
between the all-powerful Chief of Staff of
the Pakistani Army, Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa,
and US deputy Secretary of State Wendy
Sherman. Bajwa was lobbying for the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) to release
a crucial loan at the soonest, otherwise
Pakistan will default on its foreign debt.
Were deposed former Prime Minister Imran
Khan still in power, he would never have
allowed that phone call.
The plot thickens, as Al-Zawahiri’s Kabul
digs in a posh neighborhood is owned by a
close advisor to Sirajuddin Haqqani, head of
the “terrorist” (US-defined) Haqqani network
and currently Taliban Interior Minister. The
Haqqani network, needless to add, was always
very cozy with the ISI.
And then, three months ago, we had the
head of ISI, Lieutenant General Nadeem
Anjum, meeting with Biden’s National
Security Advisor Jake Sullivan in
Washington – allegedly to get their former,
joint, covert, counter-terrorism machinery
back on track.
Once again, the only question revolves
around the terms of the “offer you can’t
refuse” – and that may be connected to IMF
relief. Under these circumstances,
Al-Zawahiri was just paltry collateral
damage.
Sun Tzu deploys his six blades
Following Speaker Pelosi’s caper in
Taiwan, collateral damage is bound to
multiply like the blades of a R9-X missile.
The first stage is the People’s
Liberation Army (PLA) already having engaged
in live fire drills, with massive shelling
in the direction of the Taiwan Strait out of
Fujian province.
The first sanctions are on too, against
two Taiwanese funds. Export of sable to
Taiwan is forbidden; sable is an essential
commodity for the electronics industry – so
that will ratchet up the pain dial in
high-tech sectors of the global economy.
Chinese CATL, the world’s largest fuel
cell and lithium-ion battery maker, is
indefinitely postponing the building of a
massive $5 billion, 10,000-employee factory
that would manufacture batteries for
electric vehicles across North America,
supplying Tesla and Ford among others.
So the Sun Tzu maneuvering ahead will
essentially concentrate on a progressive
economic blockade of Taiwan, the imposition
of a partial no-fly zone, severe
restrictions of maritime traffic, cyber
warfare, and the Big Prize: inflicting pain
on the US economy.
The War on Eurasia
For Beijing, playing the long game means
the acceleration of the process involving an
array of nations across Eurasia and beyond,
trading in commodities and manufactured
products in their own currencies. They will
be progressively testing a new system that
will see the advent of a BRICS+/SCO/Eurasia
Economic Union (EAEU) basket of currencies,
and in the near future, a new reserve
currency.
The Speaker’s escapade was concomitant to
the definitive burial of the “war on terror”
cycle and its metastasis into the “war on
Eurasia” era.
It may have unwittingly provided the last
missing cog to turbo-charge the complex
machinery of the Russia-China strategic
partnership. That’s all there is to know
about the ‘strategic’ capability of the US
political ruling class. And this time no
missile on a balcony will be able to erase
the new era.
Pepe Escobar is a columnist at The
Cradle, editor-at-large at Asia Times and an
independent geopolitical analyst focused on
Eurasia. Since the mid-1980s he has lived
and worked as a foreign correspondent in
London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles, Singapore
and Bangkok. He is the author of countless
books; his latest one is Raging Twenties.