Israel to Attack Iran? Washington Gives
the Green Light to the ‘Military Option’
The U.S. will be seen as endorsing the crime,
resulting in yet another foreign policy disaster
in the Middle East, Philip Giraldi writes.
By Philip Giraldi
Mr
Giraldi attached the following statement
with this article "Friends - This
article, a regular Thursday feature for
the past three years, will be the last I
write for the site Strategic-Culture.org
(SCF) as the Department of the
Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) has notified me that the
SFC website has been "designated" and
blocked. No American citizen can have
"transactions" with SFC. Violators
will be subject to criminal and civil
penalties including fines up to
$311,562. No reason was given for the
government action. "
October 28, 2021 -- "Information
Clearing House -
"SCF"-
Some might recall candidate Joe Biden’s
pledge to work to rejoin the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action (JCPOA) which was a multilateral
agreement intended to limit Iran’s ability to
develop a nuclear weapon. The JCPOA was signed by
President Barack Obama in 2015, when Biden was Vice
President, and was considered one of the only
foreign policy successes of his eight years in
office. Other signatories to it were Britain, China,
Germany, France, and Russia and it was endorsed by
the United Nations. The agreement included
unannounced inspections of Iranian nuclear
facilities by the IAEA and, by all accounts, it was
working and was a non-proliferation success story.
In return for its cooperation Iran was to receive
its considerable assets frozen in banks in the
United States and was also to be relieved of the
sanctions that had been placed on it by Washington
and other governments.
The JCPOA crashed and burned in 2018 when
President Donald Trump ordered U.S. withdrawal from
the agreement, claiming that Iran was cheating and
would surely move to develop a nuclear weapon as
soon as the first phase of the agreement was
completed. Trump, whose ignorance on Iran and other
international issues was profound, had surrounded
himself with a totally Zionist foreign policy team,
including members of his own family, and had bought
fully into the arguments being made by Israel as
well as by Israel Lobby predominantly Jewish groups
to include the Foundation for Defense of Democracies
(FDD) and the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC). Trump’s time in office was spent
pandering to Israel in every conceivable way, to
include recognizing Jerusalem as the country’s
capital, granting Israel the green light for
creating and expanding illegal settlements on the
West Bank and recognizing the occupied Syrian Golan
Heights as part of Israel.
Given Trump’s record, most particularly the
senseless and against-American-interests abandonment
of JCPOA, it almost seemed a breath of fresh air to
hear Biden’s fractured English as he committed his
administration to doing what he could to rejoin the
other countries who were still trying to make the
agreement work. After Biden was actually elected,
more or less, he and his Secretary of State Tony
Blinken clarified what the U.S. would seek to do to
“fix” the agreement by making it stronger in some
key areas that had not been part of the original
document.
No Advertising - No
Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
Get Our Free
Newsletter
Iran for its part insisted that the agreement did
not need any additional caveats and should be a
return to the status quo ante, particularly
when Blinken and his team made clear that they were
thinking of a ban on Iranian ballistic missile
development as well as negotiations to end Tehran’s
alleged “interference” in the politics of the
region. The interference presumably referred to
Iranian support of the Palestinians as well as its
role in Syria and Yemen, all of which had earned the
hostility of American “friends” Israel and Saudi
Arabia.
Israel inevitably stirred the pot by sending a
stream of senior officials, to include Foreign
Minister Yair Lapid, Defense Minister Benny Gantz
and Prime Minister Naftali Bennett to discuss “the
Iranian threat” with Biden and his top officials.
Lapid made clear that Israel “reserves the right to
act at any given moment, in any way… We know there
are moments when nations must use force to protect
the world from evil.” And to be sure, Biden, like
Trump, has also made his true sentiments clear by
surrounding himself with Zionists. Blinken, Wendy
Sherman and Victoria Nuland have filled the three
top slots at State Department, all are Jewish and
all strong on Israel. Nuland is a leading neocon.
And pending is the
appointment of Barbara Leaf, who has been
nominated Assistant Secretary to head the State
Department’s Near East region. She is currently the
Ruth and Sid Lapidus Fellow at the Washington
Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), which is an
AIPAC spin off and a major component in the Israel
Lobby. That means that a member in good standing of
the Israel Lobby would serve as the State Department
official overseeing American policy in the Middle
East.
At the Pentagon one finds a malleable General
Mark Milley, always happy to meet his Israeli
counterparts, and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin,
an affirmative action promotion who likewise has
become adept at parroting the line “Israel has a
right to defend itself.” And need one mention ardent
self-declared Zionists at the top level of the
Democratic Party, to include Biden himself, Speaker
of the House Nancy Pelosi, House Majority Leader
Steny Hoyer and, of course, Senate Majority Leader
Chuck Schumer?
So rejoining the JCPOA over Israel objections was
a non-starter from the beginning and was probably
only mooted to make Trump look bad. Indirect talks
including both Iran and the U.S. technically have
continued in Vienna, though they have been stalled
since the end of June. Trita Parsi
has recently learned that Iran sought to make a
breakthrough for an agreement by seeking a White
House commitment to stick with the plan as long as
Biden remains in office. Biden and Blinken refused
and Blinken
has recently confirmed that a new deal is
unlikely, saying “time is running out.”
And there have been some other new developments.
Israeli officials have been warning for over twenty
years that Iran is only one year away from having
its own nukes and needs to be stopped, a claim that
has begun to sound like a religious mantra repeated
over and over, but now they are actually funding the
armaments that will be needed to do the job. Israel
Defense Force Chief of Staff Aviv Kohavi has
repeatedly
said the IDF is “accelerating” plans to strike Iran,
and Israeli politicians to include former Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have regularly been
threatening to do whatever must be done to deal with
the threat from the Islamic Republic. Israeli media
is reporting that $1.5 billion
has been allocated in the current and upcoming
budget to buy the American bunker buster bombs that
will be needed to destroy the Iranian reactor at
Bushehr and its underground research facilities at
Natanz.
In the wake of the news about the war funding,
there have also been reports that the Israeli
Air Force is engaging in what is being described as
“intense” drills to simulate attacking Iranian
nuclear facilities. After Israel obtains the
5000 pound bunker buster bombs, it will also need to
procure bombers to drop the ordnance, and one
suspects that the U.S. Congress will somehow come up
with the necessary “military aid” to make that
happen. Tony Blinken has also made clear that the
Administration knows what Israel is planning and
approves. He met with Israeli Foreign Minister Yair
Lapid on October 13th and said if
diplomacy with Iran fails, the U.S. will turn to
“other options.” And yes, he followed that up
with the venerable line that “Israel has the
right to defend itself and we strongly support that
proposition.”
Lapid confirmed that one of Blinken’s “options”
was military action. “I would like to start by
repeating what the Secretary of State just said.
Yes, other options are going to be on the table if
diplomacy fails. And by saying other options, I
think everybody understands here … what is it that
we mean.” It must be observed that in their
discussion of Iran’s nuclear program, Lapid and
Blinnken were endorsing an illegal and unprovoked
attack to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear
weapon that it is apparently not seeking, but which
it will surely turn to as a consequence if only to
defend itself in the future.
In short, U.S. foreign policy is yet again being
held hostage by Israel. The White House position is
clearly and absurdly that an Israeli attack on Iran,
considered a war crime by most, is an act of
self-defense. However it turns out, the U.S. will be
seen as endorsing the crime and will inevitably be
implicated in it, undoubtedly resulting in yet
another foreign policy disaster in the Middle East
with nothing but grief for the American people. The
simple truth is that Iran has neither threatened nor
attacked Israel. Given that, there is nothing
defensive about the actions Israel has already taken
in sabotaging Iranian facilities and assassinating
scientists, and there would be nothing defensive
about direct military attacks either with or without
U.S. assistance on Iranian soil. If Israel chooses
to play the fool it is on them and their leaders.
The United States does not have a horse in this race
and should butt out, but one doubts if a White House
and Congress, firmly controlled by Zionist forces,
have either the wisdom or the courage to cut the tie
that binds with the Jewish state.
Philip Giraldi is a former
counter-terrorism specialist and military
intelligence officer of the United States
Central Intelligence Agency.
Registration is necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.
|