August 09, 2021"Information
Clearing House" - "Libertarian
Institute" In
2014, Lew Rockwell
wrote, “Clearly the empire is targeting
China…The U.S. seeks to encircle China and make it
bow down before the hegemon. The increasing
prosperity and freedom of China threatens the
empire’s self-image.”
America’s new Cold War with China is a
bi-partisan imperial project. In 2011, former
President Barack Obama began it in earnest, dubbing
it the “Asia
Pivot.” The ‘pivot’ entails
surrounding China with hundreds of bases and
shifting two thirds of all U.S. naval and air forces
to the Asia-Pacific, the greatest military buildup
since World War II.
Putative outsider Donald Trump took office and
sizably enlarged the U.S. military’s footprint in
what is now referred to as the “Indo-Pacific” region
and significantly
increased provocations of China.
Now
President Joe Biden and his
hawk infested administration are escalating
tensions with Beijing to heights previously unseen.
Biden has said bluntly that the U.S. is in “extreme
competition” with China. In his first address to
Congress, Biden said we are competing with China to
“win
the 21st century.” Space Force has plans for the
moon to be a “militarized
front.” They see it as a venue for a future war.
Washington is
spending more on the military and so called
“defense” than at any time in the nation’s history.
The Republican Party’s
neocons say that even Biden’s 2022 national
security budget request for
more than $750 billion is not enough to counter
China and are demanding that number be increased by
tens of billions.
The Pentagon’s
excuse for its record high spending is Beijing,
the so called “pacing threat.” China poses a threat
to the hawks’ world domination, at least that is
what has been said by the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley.
According to the general, since the end of the
previous Cold War, America has held “unchallenged
global military, political and economic power. With
the rise of China, that is changing and changing
fast.”
The U.S. Military Is
Incessantly Goading China
Last year, while Americans were distracted by the
COVID-19 crisis, Trump’s war cabinet seized the
opportunity to dramatically expand military activity
around China. U.S.
warships and
aircraft carrier group strike forces sailing in
the
South China Sea were reported
constantly. In July 2020, according to the South
China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative (SCSPI),
a Beijing based think tank, the U.S. flew record
numbers of
aerial surveillance flights in the South China
Sea and near China’s coast. The number of
reconnaissance flights averaged three to five per
day. In the same month, the Trump administration
formally
rejected almost all of China’s claims to the
waters in the South China Sea. This policy has since
been
reaffirmed by the Biden regime. Under both
administrations, the U.S. has been challenging
China, using the Navy’s Seventh Fleet, inserting
itself into disputes between regional actors there
whom all have
overlapping claims on the waters including over
various, sometimes unmanned, rocks, reefs, islands,
islets, and archipelagos.
Even if it means war with China, Biden’s
administration has pledged that the U.S. will
defend Japan‘s
claims to the disputed Senkaku Islands. The Senkaku
Islands are claimed by Beijing, Tokyo, and Taipei.
Similarly, Washington has promised the
U.S. military will come to the Philippines’ defense
in the event of a violent conflict with China,
including in the South China Sea, potentially over
the disputed Whitson Reef. The Whitson Reef, the
site of recent tensions, is claimed not only by
China and the Philippines but by Vietnam as well.
No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is
Independent Media
The Navy routinely conducts what it calls
Freedom Of Navigation Operations (FONOPS), in
the waters surrounding China, sailing warships
through the waters, particularly in the South China
Sea, usually
provocatively close to Chinese
controlled or claimed islands. Biden’s regime
just conducted its fourth FONOP. Under Trump, in
2020 the U.S. conducted a record high total of nine
FONOPs poking China.
In September 2020, record numbers of
U.S. warplanes and spy planes near China’s coast
were spotted and recorded. There were at least 60
flights including over the South China Sea, the East
China Sea, and the Yellow Sea. The U.S. was sending
refueling aircraft from Guam to replenish the spy
planes enabling them to continue their operations.
As Dave DeCamp, news editor at Antiwar.com, has
written, the SCSPI interprets these sorties as the
U.S. potentially “preparing
for long-distance attacks on targets in the South
China Sea.” In February 2021,
75 U.S. reconnaissance aircraft flights in the South
China Sea were documented.
Indeed, the Chinese Defense Ministry has declared
that since Biden took office, the volatile situation
in the region has considerably worsened.
As the South China Morning Post
reported,
On the day that Biden targeted Beijing in his
first speech to a joint session of Congress,
Chinese defence ministry spokesman Wu Qian said
operations had increased by more than 20 per
cent for US warships and 40 per cent for planes
in and around waters claimed by China, compared
with the same period last year under Donald
Trump’s administration.
During the current administration’s reign, U.S.
aircraft carrier
strike groups have been repeatedly
sent to the
South China Sea, including, in one instance, for
dual carrier drills.
As Patrick Macfarlane, writer and podcaster at
the Libertarian Institute, has
elaborated,
In February, 2021, U.S. a reconnaissance
plane flirted with the same airspace as
a sortie of Chinese warplanes. More
recently, on May 14, 2021, the U.S. Navy
announced the deployment of two MQ-4C Triton
drones from Guam to Northern Japan, the first
such deployment of high-altitude long endurance
unmanned aerial vehicles (HALE-UAVs) to Japan.
These drones spy on the Taiwan Strait, Chinese
People’s Liberation Army (PLA) bases on the coast,
and military installations in the South China Sea.
In March, a U.S. Air Force RC-135U
flew within 25.33 nautical miles of the Chinese
coast, closer than any U.S. military plane recorded
yet. In April, an American destroyer
conducted close surveillance of a Chinese
aircraft carrier the Liaoning as it was
taking part in exercises in the South China Sea. The
U.S. often deploys military aircraft to shadow
Chinese drills as well.
The U.S. Navy even
released a photo of officers on the deck of a
guided missile destroyer, the USS Mustin,
staring down the Liaoning. Also in April,
satellite imagery revealed that another U.S. guided
missile destroyer actually
entered into the Liaoning’s strike group
and sailed with it for a time, the aircraft carrier
was returning from a deployment in the South China
Sea to the East China Sea. DeCamp has
explained that considering such reconnaissance
can be accomplished with the use of satellites, the
goal of these hyper-aggressive maneuvers is solely
to ramp up tensions.
In July, reports indicated the Navy has been
quite busy this year establishing an almost nonstop
deployment of surveillance ships in the South China
Sea.
As DeCamp has
reported,
…U.S. Navy ocean surveillance vessels were
operating in the South China Sea for at least
161 days out of 181 days in the first half of
this year. The U.S. has five of these vessels
stationed in Japan, which are typically active
in the South China Sea for more than 10 days at
a time, and there is virtually no time between
deployments.
The SCSPI report said that the primary
purpose of these deployments is “to monitor the
dynamics of China’s underwater forces, analyze
the scope of submarine activities in key waters
and their entry and exit routes, and provide
intelligence support for anti-submarine
operations.”
Allies Increasingly Join the Pivot
In his aforementioned first Congressional
address, Biden boasted he “also told President
Xi that we will maintain a strong military presence
in the Indo-Pacific just as we do with NATO in
Europe…”
Thus, Washington’s allies are getting in on the
Asia Pivot. The British will soon be sailing their
new aircraft carrier the
HMS Queen Elizabeth and its strike group
which includes an American destroyer and warplanes
as well, into the South China Sea. The warship
HMS Defender is already there. London will soon
permanently deploy two warships in Asia. This
was declared in a joint statement with Japan.
Japan is a part of the Quadrilateral Security
Dialogue, otherwise known as the Quad, along with
the U.S., India, and Australia. The hawks hope to
make the Quad into an East Asian NATO style
alliance.
Financial Times was
told by a source “familiar with the strategy,”
that “[t]he Biden administration is making the Quad
the core dynamic of its Asia policy.”
Last year, in an unmistakable message to China,
the Quad’s navies held war
drills in the Bay of Bengal, their largest such
exercises in more than a decade.
Tokyo has recently been hyping up the threat to
Taiwan posed by China. In the event of a “major
incident” in Taiwan,
Japanese Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso went so
far as to say that “Japan and the US must defend
Taiwan together.” With more than 50,000 troops,
Japan
hosts the largest overseas U.S. military
presence.
The End of “Engagement?”
In May, Biden’s top Asia official Kurt Campbell,
head of Indo-Pacific Affairs on the National
Security Council, was speaking at an event hosted by
Stanford University where he portentously
stated that our “engagement” with China is over.
Campbell is known as the architect of Obama’s
Asia Pivot.
“The period that was broadly described as
engagement has come to an end,” Campbell says, “the
dominant paradigm is going to be competition.”
“For the first time, really, we are now shifting
our strategic focus, our economic interests, our
military might more to the Indo-Pacific,” he added.
Taiwan, Nuclear War, and the Neocons
In 2016, on 12 occasions, Obama sailed warships
through the
sensitive Strait of Taiwan. Trump beat Obama’s
record last year by sending warships through the
strait 13 times. Biden has been in office for just
over six months and has already sailed warships
through the strait
seven times.
After the latest passage, China protested. The
PLA’s Eastern Theatre Command issued a statement
saying, “[t]he US is the biggest destroyer of peace
and stability…and the biggest maker of security
risks across the Taiwan Strait.”
Carlos del Toro, Biden’s nominee for Secretary of
the Navy, recently
vowed to the Senate Armed Services Committee
that, if confirmed, he will “exclusively” focus on
China and “…moving our maritime strategy forward in
order to protect Taiwan and all of our national
security interests in the Indo-Pacific theater.”
Republican Senator Josh Hawley
asked Del Toro if it’s “vital” for the U.S. to
be able to prevent an attack on Taiwan by China, the
nominee ominously responded “absolutely.”
In the worst case scenario, this
policy could
kill millions of people or more. This fact
apparently did not mean nearly as much to Del Toro
as his own petty career advancement.
As Senior Fellow at Defense Priorities and
Retired Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis
has explained,
It is crucial to understand that for China,
the Taiwan issue is not merely a
core interest, but an
emotionally charged one. They are far more
willing to pay extraordinary costs, sacrifice
many men, and could risk it all to eventually
compel unification with Taiwan. The issue does
not directly affect our national security unless
we get involved.
If we eventually choose war with China over
Taiwan, we will at best suffer
egregious losses in ships, aircraft, and troops;
in a worst-case, the war could deteriorate into
a nuclear exchange in which American cities are
turned into nuclear wastelands, killing
millions.
America should never take such risks
unless our security and freedom are directly
threatened. Fighting China for any reason short
of that would be a foolish gamble of the highest
order.
Although designed and overseen by liberal hawks
such as Campbell, and led officially by Democrats
like Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton, the
Asia Pivot as well as its ancillary
exploitation of the
Taiwan issue as a means to goad China has roots
in infamous neoconservative circles. That is, namely
the now defunct,
Project for a New American Century (PNAC) think
tank, founded by
Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan.
For instance, PNAC’s notorious September 2000
document “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”
contains an outline of the Asia Pivot;
Raising U.S. military strength in East Asia
is the key to coping with the rise of China to
great power status.
Reflecting the gradual shift in the focus of
American strategic concerns toward East Asia, a
majority of the U.S. fleet, including two thirds
of all carrier battle groups, should be
concentrated in the Pacific. A new, permanent
forward base should be established in Southeast
Asia.
These are the same neocons who led the push for
war in Iraq, in which maybe more than a million
Iraqis were
killed.
The New (Psychological) Cold War
As is the case with Russia, Washington is also
hyping up the threat of China’s cyber-attacks on the
U.S. using unsubstantiated allegations spread like
wildfire by the imperial press. This is likely done
to create a state of hysteria amongst our domestic
population. But it serves more than one purpose. In
March, Andrei Ilnitsky, an advisor to Russia’s
Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu,
accused the U.S. of executing a “new type of
warfare,” a “mental war,” a war being “waged for
people’s minds.”
Without sufficient evidence, Moscow is
endlessly accused of
election interference, hacking the DNC, paying
bounties to the Taliban to kill American
soldiers, poisoning Alexi Navalny or the
Skripals, the
SolarWinds hack, as well as assorted ransomware
attacks.
These unsubstantiated accusations are
deliberately capitalized on by America’s hardliners
and used often as grounds for the
eschewing critical diplomacy such as
arms control talks. This tactic is also deployed
to garner support for further expansion of NATO, the
mass expulsions of diplomats,
cyber-attacks, internet censorship, and more
sanctions.
Similarly, the sadistic, ultra-hawkish Mike
Pompeo, in one of his last acts as Secretary of
State, formally accused the Chinese of “genocide”
against its Uyghur Muslim population. Antony
Blinken, our current Foggy Bottom chief and Pompeo’s
neoliberal analogue, has since reaffirmed this
position. This
claim is circulated all over the media again and
again with weak evidence that relies on
“flagrant data abuse and outright falsehoods,”
as well as
highly questionable sources. The
hype is used by Washington to justify
multilateral sanctions and increasingly its
selective decoupling from China in regions like
Xinxiang.
Decoupling from China is an option that is talked
about more often all the time by neocons in
government like Senator
Tom Cotton and others. It would drastically
increase the likelihood of war.
Beijing is now being accused by Washington, NATO,
the U.K., and others of hacking
Microsoft’s Exchange Server, an email platform
used by various corporations and governments
worldwide. This hacking allegation dates back a few
months and, in keeping with the established pattern
with the claims against Russia, no evidence has been
brought forward yet. The claim is unproven but may
be exploited to levy more sanctions on China.
Alarmingly, NATO recently included cyberattacks
among other things that could trigger the invocation
of the Article 5 mutual defense clause. And Biden is
now
saying cyber-attacks could be used as a pretext
for a “real
shooting war with a major power,” eyeing Beijing
and Moscow.
Ali Abunimah, of the Electronic Intifada,
has
noted these unverified claims against China over
Beijing’s suspected involvement in the Microsoft
hack have been amplified and endorsed by western
governments and the corporate press. Whereas in
contrast, so many of these same entities seem
unconcerned about Washington’s satellite Tel Aviv
and its direct responsibility in the massive Pegasus
spyware scandal.
Microsoft, incidentally, is a major donor to the
Center For A New American Security (CNAS), the
anti-China, neoconservative foreign policy think
tank founded by the likes of
Asia Pivot architect Campbell and
war criminal Michele Flournoy. Flournoy has
openly stated her desire for the Pentagon, in the
event of a war, to acquire the ability to completely
destroy China’s entire civilian merchant and
military fleet within 72 hours. Before former
Raytheon board member Lloyd Austin was chosen,
Flournoy was considered a shoe in to head Biden’s
War Department. She was failed candidate Hillary
Clinton’s pick for the post as well.
As this columnist has
written previously, CNAS holds enormous sway
over the Biden administration, with many of its
hawkish co-founders, associates, former CEOs, and
members proliferating throughout the regime in
several key positions. CNAS is also
funded by a veritable who’s who of the ruling
elite including, among others, the U.S. State
Department,
Taiwan’s de facto embassy, Northrop Grumman,
Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Comcast, Exxon, Mastercard,
the Japanese Embassy to the United States,
Citigroup, Facebook, Georgetown University, Google,
and Raytheon.
The Hawks and Their Death Toll
On the world stage, the American Empire is
rapidly losing any vestiges of credibility it has
left. While
mass murderers like America’s top diplomat
Antony Blinken and National Security Advisor
Jake Sullivan condemn China’s alleged violations
of the so called “rules-based
order that maintains global stability,”
Washington backs some of the most criminal,
genocidal, and totalitarian regimes flagrantly
violating
international law today, such as
Saudi Arabia and
Israel. The U.S. ruling elite relentlessly wages
economic warfare against weaker nations like
Syria and
Iran
targeted by the above “allies” as well.
Washington also maintains bipartisan crushing
sanctions still levied against other
impoverished nations, posing zero threat to the
American people, like Cuba, Venezuela, and North
Korea. Under these sanctions, just within Venezuela,
experts say
more than 100,000 people have been killed, many
deprived to death of their vital medicines.
Robert Kagan’s wife
Victoria Nuland, now the
highest ranking member of the Foreign Service,
along with
then Vice President Biden, led a 2014
coup in Ukraine that put neo-Nazis in power on
Russia’s doorstep. Paraphrasing Robert Parry, the
late investigative journalist and founder of
Consortium News, the
‘mess Nuland made’ caused the ongoing war in the
east of the country which has
claimed the lives of well over
ten thousand people, mostly civilians and
militiamen murdered by Kiev’s forces. The bipartisan
U.S. policy now includes piling sanctions on Moscow,
sending hundreds of millions dollars’ worth of arms
to Kiev, and
constantly conducting military exercises in the
Black Sea. This has largely led to the current
state of affairs, the worst U.S.-Russian relations
since the previous Cold War.
Americans can no longer ignore that it is, in
fact, their government, the world empire,
with some 800 bases in 70 countries, that
began this new Cold War and remains the
aggressor. The U.S. Empire is the single greatest
threat to peace and global stability. After all, it
was Washington that unilaterally withdrew from major
20th century arms control pillars such as the
Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the
Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, and Open
Skies. It is these jingoistic moves which have
triggered a
nuclear arms race in the 21st century.
The U.S. government has still not been held
responsible for its recent atrocities including
George W. Bush’s torture program, the devastating
20-year Afghanistan war, the
Iraq War, as well as the ongoing U.S.-Saudi
total war and siege on Yemen, the world’s
worst humanitarian crisis. At the highest
levels, Washington has even committed outright
treason against the American people taking the
side of al Qaeda and its affiliates notably in the
wars on
Libya, Syria, and
Yemen. Hundreds of thousands of people have been
slaughtered in these conflicts alone.
As Martin Luther King Jr.
said during the Vietnam War, in which successive
U.S. regimes butchered millions, it is this
government that is “the greatest purveyor of
violence in the world today.”
Getting Off the Path to War
There is no reason for war and brinksmanship, nor
this mammoth buildup. “Renewed
Power Competition” with
Russia and China is a project of
neoconservatives and other American imperialists.
These hawks are ideologically
bent on global primacy and “full spectrum
dominance.” Their chosen brand of “competition”
serves doubly as a gargantuan public works project
for the military, particularly the Air Force and the
Navy, and is a multi-trillion-dollar corporate
welfare scheme for the military industrial complex.
However, America is broke and $30 trillion in debt.
This “competition” is at our direct expense, it
undoubtably will further impoverish and imperil the
American people. The new Cold War era will also
surely suffocate any and all of our remnants of
liberty.
To avoid the coming calamity, Americans and
especially libertarians of all stripes can no longer
afford to sit on the sidelines while their corrupt
ruling class recklessly drives us towards war with
Beijing and Moscow. At a minimum, we must promptly
regain control of our foreign policy and, in the
spirit of the
Ron Paul Revolution, unceasingly pursue
diplomacy, free trade, free travel, and cultural
exchange. We can still choose peace.
China has not attacked us, but has been
surrounded by myriad American warplanes, warships,
submarines, missiles, and hundreds of military
bases.
For what ultimate purpose do we suppose these
hawks, who have killed so many, intend to use those
warplanes, warships, submarines, missiles, and
bases?
Registration is necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.